Sự tương tác của các mục tiêu học tập lịch sử và STEM trong tài liệu giáo trình do giáo viên phát triển: cơ hội và thách thức cho giáo dục STEAM
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
#Tích hợp chương trình giảng dạy #STEAM #giáo dục #mục tiêu học tập lịch sử #STEM #phân tích lịch sử #kỹ năng tìm hiểu khoa học #trả lời đạo đức #phát triển giáo trìnhTài liệu tham khảo
Al Salami, M. K., Makela, C. J., & de Miranda, M. A. (2017). Assessing changes in teachers’ attitudes toward interdisciplinary STEM teaching. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(1), 63–88.
Allchin, D. (2000). How not to teach historical cases in science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30(1), 33–37.
Allchin, D., Andersen, H. M., & Nielsen, K. (2014). Complementary approaches to teaching nature of science: Integrating student inquiry, historical cases, and contemporary cases in classroom practice. Science Education, 98(3), 461–486.
Allchin, D., Anthony, E., Bristol, J., Dean, A., Hall, D., & Lieb, C. (1999). History of science—with labs. Science & Education, 8(6), 619–632.
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso Books.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Ashby, R., & Lee, P. J. (1987). Children’s concepts of empathy and understanding in history. In C. Portal (Ed.), The history curriculum for teachers (pp. 62–88). Falmer.
Baildon, M., & Afandi, S. (2018). History education research and practice: An international perspective. In S. A. Metzger & L. M. Harris (Eds.), The Wiley international handbook of history teaching and learning (pp. 37–60). Wiley.
Beane, J. A. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. Teachers College Press.
Bell, D. S. (2003). Mythscapes: Memory, mythology, and national identity. The British Journal of Sociology, 54(1), 6–81.
Bequette, J. W., & Bequette, M. B. (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art Education, 65(2), 40–47.
Berger, S. (2012). De-nationalizing history teaching and nationalizing it differently: Some reflections on how to defuse the negative potential of national(ist) history teaching. In M. Carretero, M. Asensio, & M. Rodríguez-Moneo (Eds.), History education and the construction of national identities (pp. 33–48). Information Age Publishing.
Breakstone, J. (2014). Try, try, try again: The process of designing new history assessments. Theory and Research in Social Education, 42(4), 453–485.
Broggy, J., O’Reilly, J., & Erduran, S. (2017). Interdisciplinarity and science education. In K. Taber & B. Akpan (Eds.), Science education: An international course companion (pp. 81–90). Springer.
Carretero, M. (2011). Constructing patriotism: Teaching history and memories in global worlds. Information Age Publishing.
Cartwright, N. (1999). The dappled world: A study on the boundaries of science. Cambridge University Press.
Cobern, W. W., & Loving, C. C. (2001). Defining “science” in a multicultural world: Implications for science education. Science Education, 85(1), 50–67.
Colucci-Gray, L., Burnard, P., Gray, D., & Cooke, C. (2019). A critical review of STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education (March 2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.398
Colucci-Gray, L., Trowsdale, J., Cooke, C. F., Davies, R., Burnard, P., & Gray, D. S. (2017). Reviewing the potential and challenges of developing STEAM education through creative pedagogies for 21st learning: How can school curricula be broadened towards a more responsive, dynamic, and inclusive form of education? British Educational Research Association.
Corp, A., Fields, M., & Naizer, G. (2020). Elementary STEM teacher education: Recent practices to prepare general elementary teachers for STEM. In C. C. Johnson, M. J. Mohr-Schoroeder, T. J. Moore, & L. D. English (Eds.), Handbook of research on STEM education (pp. 337–348). Routledge.
De Groot-Reuvekamp, M. J., Van Boxtel, C., Ros, A., & Harnett, P. (2014). The understanding of historical time in the primary history curriculum in England and the Netherlands. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(4), 487–514.
De la Garza, A., & Travis, C. (2019). The STEAM Revolution: Transdisciplinary approaches to science, technology, engineering, arts, humanities and mathematics. Springer.
Drake, S. M. (2007). Creating standards-based integrated curriculum: Aligning curriculum, content, assessment, and instruction (2nd ed.). Corwin.
Drake, S. M., & Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Drake, S. M., & Reid, J. L. (2018). Integrated curriculum as an effective way to teach 21st century capabilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 31–50.
Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. R. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education. Springer.
Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (Eds.). (2007). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. Springer.
Erduran, S., Guilfoyle, L., & Park, W. (in press). Broadening STEM education through cross-curricular collaboration: The case of argumentation in science and religious education. In Y. Li (Ed.), Changes and innovations in disciplinary and interdisciplinary education in STEM: An international perspective. Springer.
Eurydice. (2011). Science education in Europe: National policies, practices and research. Publications Office of the EU.
Fauvel, J. (1991). Using history in mathematics education. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(2), 3–6.
Foster, S. (1999). Using historical empathy to excite students about the study of history: Can you empathize with Neville Chamberlain? The Social Studies, 90(1), 18–24.
Fried, M. N. (2014). History of mathematics in mathematics education. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 669–703). Springer.
Furinghetti, F., Matos, J. M., & Menghini, M. (2012). From mathematics and education, to mathematics education. In Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 273–302). Springer.
Gandolfi, H. E. (2021). Decolonising the science curriculum in England: Bringing decolonial science and technology studies to secondary education. Curriculum Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.97
Ge, X., Ifenthaler, D., & Spector, J. M. (Eds.). (2015). Emerging technologies for STEAM education: Full STEAM ahead. Springer.
Gehrke, N. J. (1998). A look at curriculum integration from the bridge. Curriculum Journal, 9(2), 247–260.
Gunckel, K. L., & Tolbert, S. (2018). The imperative to move toward a dimension of care in engineering education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 938–961.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y., Klassen, S., & Klassen, C. F. (2012). Encouraging a “romantic understanding” of science: The effect of the Nikola Tesla story. Science & Education, 21(8), 1111–1138.
Hallstrom, J., & Gyberg, P. (2009). Technology in the rear-view mirror: How to better incorporate the history of technology into technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(1), 3–17.
Hempel, C. G. (1942). The function of general laws in history. The Journal of Philosophy, 39(2), 35–48.
Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Fisser, P. (2016). Infusing creativity and technology in 21st century education: A systemic view for change. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 27–37.
Hodson, D. (1993). In search of a rationale for multicultural science education. Science Education, 77(6), 685–711.
Hong, O. (2017). STEAM education in Korea: Current policies and future directions. Science and Technology Trends Policy Trajectories and Initiatives in STEM Education, 8(2), 92–102.
International Big History Association. (IBHA). (2021) What is big history?—International Big History Association. Retrieved June 27, 2021, from https://bighistory.org/
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2007). Argumentation in science education: An overview. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education (pp. 3–28). Springer.
Johnson, B. (2003). Teacher collaboration: Good for some, not so good for others. Educational Studies, 29(4), 337–350.
Kahn, S., & Zeidler, D. L. (2019). A conceptual analysis of perspective taking: Positioning a tangled construct within science education and beyond. Science & Education, 28(6–7), 605–638.
Khine, M. S., & Areepattamannil, S. (2018). STEAM education: Theory and practice. Springer.
Klein, J. T. (2017). Typologies of interdisciplinarity: The boundary work of definition. In R. Frodeman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity (pp. 21–34). Oxford University Press.
Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity. (KOFAC). (n.d.). Mission and vision. Retrieved from https://www.kofac.re.kr/eng/contents/aboutKofac3.do
Kuhn, D., Winestock, M., & Flaton, R. (1994). Historical reasoning as theory-evidence coordination. In M. Carretero & J. F. Voss (Eds.), Cognitive and instructional processes in history and the social sciences (pp. 377–402). Erlbaum.
Lam, C. C., Alviar-Martin, T., Adler, S. A., & Sim, J. B. Y. (2013). Curriculum integration in Singapore: Teachers’ perspectives and practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 31(1), 23–34.
Lee, P. (2007). From national canon to historical literacy. In M. Grever & S. Stuurman (Eds.), Beyond the canon: History for the twenty-first century (pp. 48–62). Palgrave Macmillan.
Lee, Y. C. (2018). When technology, science and culture meet: Insights from ancient Chinese technology. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 13(2), 485–515.
Lesseig, K., Slavit, D., Nelson, T. H., & Seidel, R. A. (2016). Supporting middle school teachers’ implementation of STEM design challenges. School Science and Mathematics, 116(4), 177–188.
Marsh, C. J., & Willis, G. (2007). Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing issues. Pearson Education.
Matthews, M. (2005). The pendulum: Scientific, historical, philosophical and educational perspectives. Springer.
Matthews, M. R. (2014). Science teaching: The contribution of history and philosophy of science (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Medin, D. L., & Bang, M. (2014). Who’s asking? Native science, Western Science, and science education. MIT Press.
Merry, M. S. (2009). Patriotism, history and the legitimate aims of American education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(4), 378–398.
Nagel, E. (1961). The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. Harcourt Brace & World.
Newton, M. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2020). Developing socioscientific perspective taking. International Journal of Science Education, 42(8), 1302–1319.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For States, by States. National Academy Press.
OECD. (2020). PISA 2024 strategic vision and direction for science. Retrieved March 3, 2021, from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA-2024-Science-Strategic-Vision-Proposal.pdf
Ogawa, M. (1995). Science education in a multiscience perspective. Science Education, 79(5), 583–593.
Park, W., & Song, J. (2021). Looking back at “our science” and “our history”: An exploration of Korean preservice science teachers’ encounters with East Asian history of science. Cultural Studies of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-021-10060-w
Park, W., Wu, J. Y., & Erduran, S. (2020). Investigating the epistemic nature of STEM: Analysis of science curriculum documents from the USA using the family resemblance approach. In Integrated approaches to STEM education (pp. 137–155). Springer.
Peppler, K., & Wohlwend, K. (2018). Theorizing the nexus of STEAM practice. Arts Education Policy Review, 119(2), 88–99.
Pleasants, J. (2020). Inquiring into the nature of STEM problems: Implications for pre-college education. Science & Education, 29, 831–855.
Quigley, C. F., & Herro, D. (2016). “Finding the joy in the unknown”: Implementation of STEAM teaching practices in middle school science and math classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(3), 410–426.
Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., & Jamil, F. M. (2017). Developing a conceptual model of STEAM teaching practices. School Science and Mathematics, 117(1–2), 1–12.
Quigley, C. F., Herro, D., Shekell, C., Cian, H., & Jacques, L. (2020). Connected learning in STEAM classrooms: Opportunities for engaging youth in science and math classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(8), 1441–1463.
Rouet, J. F., Britt, M. A., Mason, R. A., & Perfetti, C. A. (1996). Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 478–493.
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Moral sensitivity and its contribution to the resolution of socio-scientific issues. Journal of Moral Education, 33(3), 339–358.
Sadler, T. D., & Dawson, V. (2012). Socioscientific issues in science education: Contexts for the promotion of key learning outcomes. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 799–810). Springer.
Semken, S., Ward, E. G., Moosavi, S., & Chinn, P. W. U. (2017). Place-based education in geoscience: Theory, research, practice and assessment. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65, 542–562.
Sharapan, H. (2012). From STEM to STEAM: How early childhood educators can apply Fred Rogers’ approach. Young Children, 67(1), 36.
Spector, J. M. (2015). Education, training, competencies, curricula and technology: Full STEAM ahead. In X. Ge, D. Ifenthaler, & J. M. Spector (Eds.), Emerging technologies for STEAM education (pp. 3–14). Springer.
Spoehr, K. T., & Spoehr, L. W. (1994). Learning to think historically. Educational Psychologist, 29(2), 71–77.
Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N. W. (1994). Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education. Science Education, 78(4), 387–398.
Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (3rd ed.). Wiley.
Tohmatsu, H. (2011). Japanese history textbooks in comparative perspective. In G.-W. Shin & D. C. Sneider (Eds.), History textbooks and the wars in Asia: Divided memories (pp. 115–139). Routledge.
Van Drie, J., & Van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for analyzing students’ reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20(2), 87–110.
VanSledright, B. (2008). Narratives of nation-state, historical knowledge, and school history education. Review of Research in Education, 32(1), 109–146.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage.
Yuen, T., & Byram, M. (2007). National identity, patriotism and studying politics in schools: A case study in Hong Kong. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 37(1), 23–36.
Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research, and practice. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, Volume II (pp. 711–740). Routledge.