The influence of goals on movement kinematics during imitation
Tóm tắt
This study took a quantitative approach to investigate movement kinematics during the imitation of goal-directed and non-goal directed movements. Motion tracking equipment was used to record the hand movements of 15 healthy participants during an imitation task involving aiming movements that varied in speed. We predicted that movement kinematics would be most similar to the observed movements in the non-goal condition, as a result of direct visuomotor mapping of the action, and least similar in the goal-directed condition because more importance would be given to the end goal. We also predicted that precues (prior information about the movement) would increase imitation accuracy in the non-goal condition by reducing cognitive demand, and that precues would reduce accuracy in the goal-directed condition, as less attention would be paid to the movement. Results showed that imitation was modulated by the speed of the observed action in the non-goal condition only. Contrary to predictions, precues did not improve imitation in the non-goal condition or improve imitation accuracy in the goal-directed condition. These results demonstrate that visuomotor mapping is favoured in non-goal imitation, regardless of prior information, and that accurate imitation of movement detail is compromised by the presence of goals. Such differences in movement kinematics indicate that different processes mediate the imitation of non-goal and goal-directed actions.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bekkering H, Wohlschlager A, Gattis M (2000) Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Q J Exp Psychol A 53:153–164
Butterworth G (1990) On reconceptualising sensori-motor coordination in dynamic system terms. In: Bloch H, Bertenthal BI (eds) Sensory motor organisations and development in infancy and early childhood. Kluwer, The Netherlands, pp 57–73
Carmo JC, Rumiati RI (2009) Imitation of transitive and intransitive actions in healthy individuals. Brain Cogn 69:460–464
Flanagan JR, Johansson RS (2003) Action plans used in action observation. Nature 424:769–771
Hamilton AF (2008) Emulation and mimicry for social interaction: a theoretical approach to imitation in autism. Q J Exp Psychol (Colchester) 61:101–115
Hobson RP, Hobson JA (2008) Dissociable aspects of imitation: a study in autism. J Exp Child Psychol 101:170–185
Hobson RP, Lee A (1999) Imitation and identification in autism. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 40:649–659
Jones V, Prior M (1985) Motor imitation abilities and neurological signs in autistic children. J Autism Dev Disord 15:37–46
Kroliczak G, Frey SH (2009) A common network in the left cerebral hemisphere represents planning of tool use pantomimes and familiar intransitive gestures at the hand-independent level. In: Cerebral cortex. Accessed 30 Jan 2009
Longo MR, Kosobud A, Bertenthal BI (2008) Automatic imitation of biomechanically possible and impossible actions: effects of priming movements versus goals. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 34:489–501
Press C, Heyes C (2008) Stimulus-driven selection of routes to imitation. Exp Brain Res 188:147–152
Press C, Bird G, Walsh E, Heyes C (2008) Automatic imitation of intransitive actions. Brain Cogn 67:44–50
Rumiati RI, Tessari A (2002) Imitation of novel and well-known actions: the role of short-term memory. Exp Brain Res 142:425–433
Rumiati RI, Carmo JC, Corradi-Dell’Acqua C (2009) Neuropsychological perspectives on the mechanisms of imitation. Philos Trans R Soc B (submitted)
Tessari A, Rumiati RI (2004) The strategic control of multiple routes in imitation of actions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 30:1107–1116
Wohlschlager A, Gattis M, Bekkering H (2003) Action generation and action perception in imitation: an instance of the ideomotor principle. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358:501–515