The impact of simulated hemianopia on visual search for faces, words, and cars
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Albert ML, Sparks R, von Stockert T, Sax D (1972) A case study of auditory agnosia: linguistic and nonlinguistic processing. Cortex 8(4):427–443
Bao JY et al (2015) The effects of homonymous hemianopia in experimental studies of alexia. Neuropsychologia 70:156–164
Barnes CS, Del’Aune W, Schuchard RA (2011) A test of face discrimination ability in aging and vision loss. Optom vis Sci 88:188–199
Barton JJS (2008) Structure and function in acquired prosopagnosia: lessons from a series of 10 patients with brain damage. J Neuropsychol 2:197–225
Barton JJ, Cherkasova MV, Press DZ, Intriligator JM, O'Connor M (2004) Perceptual functions inprosopagnosia. Perception 33(8):939–956
Behrmann M et al (2001) The eye movements of pure alexic patients during reading and nonreading tasks. Neuropsychologia 39:983–1002
Bjornstrom LE et al (2014) Visual word expertise: a study of inversion and the word-length effect, with perceptual transforms. Perception 43:438–450
Brown SD, Heathcote A (2008) The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation. Cogn Psychol 57:153–178
Bueichekú E, Miró-Padilla A, Ávila C (2020) Functional connectivity at rest captures individual differences invisual search. Brain Struct Funct 225(2):537–549
Bullimore M, Bailey IL, Wacker RT (1991) Face recognition in age-related maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol vis Sci 32:2020–2029
Campion J, Latto R (1985) Apperceptive agnosia due to carbon monoxide poisoning. An interpretation basedon critical band masking from disseminated lesions. Behav brain Res 15(3):227–240
Cohen L et al (2003) Visual word recognition in the left and right hemispheres: anatomical and functional correlates of peripheral alexias. Cereb Cortex 13:1313–1333
Cousineau D, Shiffrin RM (2004) Termination of a visual search with large display size effects. Spat vis17(4):327–352
Dalrymple KA et al (2014) “A room full of strangers every day”: the psychosocial impact of developmental prosopagnosia on children and their families. J Psychosom Res 77:144–150
Djouab S et al (2020) Search for face identity and expression: set-size effects in developmental prosopagnosia. J Cogn Neurosci pPess. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01519
Donkin C et al (2009) Getting more from accuracy and response time data: methods for fitting the linear ballistic accumulator. Behav Res Methods 41:1095–1110
Donkin C et al (2011) Diffusion versus linear ballistic accumulation: different models but the same conclusions about psychological processes? Psychon Bull Rev 18:61–69
Fujino T, Kigazawa KI, Yamada R (1986) Homonymous hemianopia: a retrospective study of 140 cases. Neuro-Ophthalmology 6:17–21
Glen FC et al (2012) Do patients with glaucoma have difficulty recognizing faces? Invest Ophthalmol vis Sci 53:3629–3637
Glen FC, Smith ND, Crabb DP (2013) Saccadic eye movements and face recognition performance in patients with central glaucomatous visual field defects. Vision Res 82:42–51
Groner R, Walder F, Groner M 1984 Looking at faces: local and global aspects of scanpaths. Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research. Vol. A. Gale F. Johnson, ed. eds. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 523–33.
Head H (1920) Studies in neurology. Oxford University, London
Hemstrom J et al (2019) Visual search for complex objects: Set-size effects for faces, words and cars. Vision Res 162:8–19
Kosslyn SM, Hamilton SE, Bernstein JH (1995) The perception of curvature can be selectively disruptedin prosopagnosia. Brain Cogn 27(1):36–58
Langner O et al (2010) Presentation and validation of the radboud faces database. Cogn Emot 24:1377–1388
Leff A et al (2001) The functional anatomy of single-word reading in patients with hemianopic and pure alexia. Brain 124:510–521
Leff A et al (2006) Structural anatomy of pure and hemianopic alexia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77:1004–1007
Levine DN, Warach J, Farah M (1985) Two visual systems in mental imagery Dissociation of “what” and “where” in imagery disorders due to bilateral posterior cerebral lesions. Neurology 35:1010–1010
Liu RR et al (2015) The processing of voice identity in developmental prosopagnosia. Cortex 71:390–397
Macmillan N, Creelman C (1991) Detection theory: A user’s guide. Cambridge University Press, New York
Mitra AR et al (2010) Line bisection in simulated homonymous hemianopia. Neuropsychologia 48:1742–1749
Ogun O, Viswanathan J, Barton JJ (2011) The effect of central (macula) sparing on contralateral line bisection bias: a study with virtual hemianopia. Neuropsychologia 49:3377–3382
Pflugshaupt T et al (2009) About the role of visual field defects in pure alexia. Brain 132:1907–1917
Ratcliff R, Rouder JN (1998) Modeling response times for two-choice decisions. Psychol Sci 9:347–356
Rizzo M, Hurtig R, Damasio AR (1987) The role of scanpaths in facial recognition and learning. Ann Neurol 22:41–45
Rossion B (2008) Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychol (amst) 128:274–289
Rubino C, Yeung SC, Barton JJ (2016) The impact of central sparing on the word-length effect in hemianopia. Cogn Neuropsychol 33:353–361
Schuett S et al (2009) Adaptation of eye-movements to simulated hemianopia in reading and visual exploration: transfer or specificity? Neuropsychologia 47:1712–1720
Sekuler AB et al (2004) Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing. Curr Biol 14:391–396
Serino A, Cecere R, Dundon N, Bertini C, Sanchez-Castaneda C, Ladavas E (2014) When apperceptiveagnosia is explained by a deficit of primary visual processing. Cortex 52:12–27
Sheldon CA et al (2012) The word-length effect in acquired alexia, and real and virtual hemianopia. Neuropsychologia 50:841–851
Simpson SA, Abegg M, Barton JJ (2011) Rapid adaptation of visual search in simulated hemianopia. Cereb Cortex 21:1593–1601
Takahashi N et al (1995) Prosopagnosia: a clinical and anatomical study of four patients. Cortex 31:317–329
Tejeria L et al (2002) Face recognition in age related macular degeneration: perceived disability, measured disability, and performance with a bioptic device. Br J Ophthalmol 86:1019–1026
Townsend JT, Wenger MJ (2004) The serial-parallel dilemma: a case study in a linkage of theory andmethod. Psychon Bull Rev 11(3):391–418
Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Brendler K (1998) Eye movements in reading with hemianopic field defects: the significance of clinical parameters. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 236:91–102
Trauzettel-Klosinski, S., 2017. Adaptation and rehabilitation in patients with homonymous visual field defects. Homonymous Visual Field Defects. Vol., K. Skorkovská, ed.eds. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 121–33.
Van Zandt T, Colonius H, Proctor RW (2000) A comparison of two response time models applied to perceptual matching. Psychon Bull Rev 7:208–256