The impact of probabilistic feature cueing depends on the level of cue abstraction

Ansorge U, Becker SI (2012) Automatic priming of attentional control by relevant colors. Atten Percept Psychophys 74(1):83–104. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0231-6

Behrens TE, Woolrich MW, Walton ME, Rushworth MF (2007) Learning the value of information in an uncertain world. Nat Neurosci 10(9):1214–1221. doi: 10.1038/nn1954

Brown TL, Gore CL, Carr TH (2002) Visual attention and word recognition in Stroop color naming: is word recognition “automatic”? J Exp Psychol Gen 131(2):220–240

Daunizeau J, den Ouden HE, Pessiglione M, Kiebel SJ, Friston KJ, Stephan KE (2010a) Observing the observer (II): deciding when to decide. PLoS One 5(12):e15555. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015555

Daunizeau J, den Ouden HE, Pessiglione M, Kiebel SJ, Stephan KE, Friston KJ (2010b) Observing the observer (I): meta-Bayesian models of learning and decision-making. PLoS One 5(12):e15554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015554

Egner T, Monti JM, Trittschuh EH, Wieneke CA, Hirsch J, Mesulam MM (2008) Neural integration of top-down spatial and feature-based information in visual search. J Neurosci 28(24):6141–6151. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1262-08.2008

Ferrand L, Augustinova M (2014) Differential effects of viewing positions on standard versus semantic Stroop interference. Psychon Bull Rev 21(2):425–431. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0507-z

Geng JJ, Behrmann M (2005) Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search. Percept Psychophys 67(7):1252–1268

Giesbrecht B, Woldorff MG, Song AW, Mangun GR (2003) Neural mechanisms of top-down control during spatial and feature attention. Neuroimage 19(3):496–512

Giessing C, Thiel CM, Rosler F, Fink GR (2006) The modulatory effects of nicotine on parietal cortex activity in a cued target detection task depend on cue reliability. Neuroscience 137(3):853–864. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.10.005

Labuschagne EM, Besner D (2015) Automaticity revisited: when print doesn’t activate semantics. Front Psychol 6:117. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00117

Lacouture Y, Cousineau C (2008) How to use MATLAB to fit the ex-Gaussian and other probability functions to a distribution of response times. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol 4:35–45

Landau AN, Elwan D, Holtz S, Prinzmetal W (2012) Voluntary and involuntary attention vary as a function of impulsivity. Psychon Bull Rev 19(3):405–411. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0240-z

Macaluso E, Doricchi F (2013) Attention and predictions: control of spatial attention beyond the endogenous-exogenous dichotomy. Front Hum Neurosci 7:685. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00685

MacLeod CM (1991) Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychol Bull 109(2):163–203

Millar K (1983) Clinical trial design: the neglected problem of asymmetrical transfer in cross-over trials. Psychol Med 13(4):867–873

Muller HJ, Geyer T (2009) Dynamics of attentional control. Psychol Res 73(2):123–126. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0203-1

Muller HJ, Rabbitt PM (1989) Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15(2):315–330

Muller HJ, Tollner T, Zehetleitner M, Geyer T, Rangelov D, Krummenacher J (2010) Dimension-based attention modulates feed-forward visual processing. Acta Psychol (Amst) 135(2):117–122. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.004 (discussion 133–119)

Neely JH, VerWys CA, Kahan TA (1998) Reading “glasses” will prime “vision”, but reading a pair of “glasses” will not. Mem Cognit 26(1):34–39

Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES (1995) Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol 51(6):768–774

Posner MI (1980) Orienting of attention. Q J Exp Psychol 32(1):3–25

Rangelov D, Muller HJ, Zehetleitner M (2011) Dimension-specific intertrial priming effects are task-specific: evidence for multiple weighting systems. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 37(1):100–114. doi: 10.1037/a0020364

Riggio L, Kirsner K (1997) The relationship between central cues and peripheral cues in covert visual orientation. Percept Psychophys 59(6):885–899

Schenkluhn B, Ruff CC, Heinen K, Chambers CD (2008) Parietal stimulation decouples spatial and feature-based attention. J Neurosci 28(44):11106–11110. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3591-08.2008

Soto D, Rotshtein P, Hodsoll J, Mevorach C, Humphreys GW (2012) Common and distinct neural regions for the guidance of selection by visuoverbal information held in memory: converging evidence from fMRI and rTMS. Hum Brain Mapp 33(1):105–120. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21196

Stankevich BA, Geng JJ (2014) Reward associations and spatial probabilities produce additive effects on attentional selection. Atten Percept Psychophys. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0720-5

Theeuwes J (2013) Feature-based attention: it is all bottom-up priming. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 368(1628):20130055. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0055

Theeuwes J, Van der Burg E (2007) The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33(6):1335–1351. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1335

Vandenberghe R, Gitelman DR, Parrish TB, Mesulam MM (2001) Location- or feature-based targeting of peripheral attention. Neuroimage 14(1 Pt 1):37–47. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0790

Vossel S, Bauer M, Mathys C, Adams RA, Dolan RJ, Stephan KE, Friston KJ (2014a) Cholinergic stimulation enhances Bayesian belief updating in the deployment of spatial attention. J Neurosci 34(47):15735–15742. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0091-14.2014

Vossel S, Mathys C, Daunizeau J, Bauer M, Driver J, Friston KJ, Stephan KE (2014b) Spatial attention, precision, and Bayesian inference: a study of saccadic response speed. Cereb Cortex 24(6):1436–1450. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs418

Whelan R (2008) Effective analysis of reaction time data. Psychol Rec 58(3):475–482