The impact of brand gender on brand equity

Emerald - Tập 33 Số 2 - Trang 178-195 - 2016
Theo Lieven1, Christian Hildebrand2
1Institute for Customer Insight, University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
2Institute for Customer Insight, University of St Gallen, St Galen, Switzerland

Tóm tắt

Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of brand gender on brand equity across countries and cultures in various product domains.Design/methodology/approach– Consumers from ten countries on four continents rated 20 global brands, leading to a total of 16,934 cross-clustered observations. Linear mixed effect models examined a series of nested models, testing three novel brand gender effects with respect to the impact of androgynous brands on brand equity and the moderating role of consumers’ biological sex as well as individualistic and collectivistic cultures. Additional robustness tests provide support on form, metric, and scalar invariance of the measurements and the robustness of the observed effects across countries and cultures.Findings– The current research reveals that androgynous brands generate higher brand equity relative to exclusively masculine, exclusively feminine, and undifferentiated brands. The authors also show a brand gender congruence effect such that male consumers value masculine brands higher than females while female consumers value more feminine brands higher than males. Finally, highly masculine brands generate higher brand equity in more individualistic countries whereas highly feminine brands generate higher brand equity in more collectivistic countries.Originality/value– This is the first research examining and demonstrating the positive influence of androgynous brand gender perceptions on brand equity. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is also the first paper examining brand gender effects across countries and cultures.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aaker, D.A. (1991), Managing Brand Equity , The Free Press, New York, NY.

Agarwal, M.K. and Rao, V.R. (1996), “An empirical comparison of consumer-based measures of brand equity”, Marketing Letters , Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 237-247.

Aiken, L.S. and West, S.G. (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interaction , Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.

Alreck, P.L. , Settle, R.B. and Belch, M.A. (1982), “Who responds to ‘gendered’ ads, and how? Masculine brands versus feminine brands”, Journal of Advertising Research , Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 25-32.

Azar, S.L. (2013), “Exploring brand masculine patterns: moving beyond monolithic masculinity”, Journal of Product & Brand Management , Vol. 22 No. 7, pp. 502-512.

Bem, S.L. (1974), “The measurement of psychological androgyny”, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , Vol. 42 No. 2, pp. 155-162.

Bem, S.L. (1977), “On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny”, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , Vol. 45 No. 2, pp. 196-205.

Blanz, M. (1999), “Accessibility and fit as determinants of the salience of social categorizations”, European Journal of Social Psychology , Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 43-74.

Brady, M.K. , Cronin, J.J. Jr , Fox, G.L. and Roehm, M.L. (2008), “Strategies to offset performance failures: the role of brand equity”, Journal of Retailing , Vol. 84 No. 2, pp. 151-164.

Campbell, K. (2011), “Caring and daring entrepreneurship research”, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development: An International Journal , Vol. 23 Nos 1-2, pp. 37-47.

Cannon, J.P. , Doney, P.M. , Mullen, M.R. and Petersen, K.J. (2010), “Building long-term orientation in buyer-supplier relationships: the moderating role of culture”, Journal of Operations Management , Vol. 28 No. 6, pp. 506-521.

Chen, C.C. , Chen, X.-P. and Meindl, J.R. (1998), “How can cooperation be fostered? The cultural effects of individualism-collectivism”, The Academy of Management Review , Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 285-304.

Cheung, G.W. and Rensvold, R.B. (2000), “Assessing extreme and acquiescence response sets in cross-cultural research using structural equation modeling”, Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology , Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 187-212.

Christodoulides, G. and de Chernatony, L. (2010), “Consumer based brand equity conceptualization and measurement: a literature review”, International Journal of Research in Marketing , Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 43-66.

De Bellis, E. , Hildebrand, C. , Ito, K. and Herrmann, A. (2015), “Cross-national differences in uncertainty avoidance predict the effectiveness of mass customization across East Asia: a large-scale field investigation”, Marketing Letters , Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 309-320.

Dion, K. , Berscheid, E. and Walster, E. (1972), “What is beautiful is good”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 285-290.

Dolnicar, S. and Rossiter, J.R. (2008), “The low stability of brand-attribute associations is partly due to market research methodology”, International Journal of Research in Marketing , Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 104-108.

Eagly, A.H. (1995), “The science and politics of comparing women and men”, American Psychologist , Vol. 50 No. 3, pp. 145-158.

Fischer, H. , Sandblom, J. , Herlitz, A. , Fransson, P. , Wright, C. and Bäckman, L. (2004), “Sex-differential brain activation during exposure to female and male faces”, Neuroreport , Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 235-238.

Fischer, R. (2004), “Standardization to account for cross-cultural response bias: a classification of score adjustment procedures and review of research in JCCP”, Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology , Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 263-282.

Gough, H.G. (1957), California Psychological Inventory: Manual , Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA.

Grohmann, B. (2009), “Gender dimensions of brand personality”, Journal of Marketing Research , Vol. 46 No. 1, pp. 105-119.

Harris, M.H. , Davis, D.L. and Allen, J.W. (1994), “Fostering corporate entrepreneurship: cross-cultural comparisons of the importance of individualism versus collectivism”, Journal of International Business Studies , Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 65-89.

Hofstede, G. (1980), Culture’s Consequences – International Differences in Work Related Values , Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.

Hofstede, G. , Hofstede, G.J. and Minkov, M. (2010), Cultures and Organizations – Software of the Mind: Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival , McGraw-Hill Professional, New York, NY.

Jackson, L.A. (1983), “The perception of androgyny and physical attractiveness: two is better than one”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 405-413.

Kane, Y.I. and Sherr, I. (2011), “Secrets from Apple’s Genius Bar: Full Loyalty, No Negativity”, The Wall Street Journal, available at: www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304563104576364071955678908 (accessed July 26, 2015).

Kapferer, J.-N. (2012), The New Strategic Brand Management – Advanced Insights & Strategic Thinking , 5th ed., Kogan Page, London.

Katz, P.A. (1986), “Gender identity: development and consequences”, in Ashmore, R.D. and Del Boca, F.K. (Eds), The Social Psychology of Female-Male Relations. A Critical Analysis of Central Concepts , Academic Press, Orlando, FL, pp. 21-67.

Keller, K.L. (1993), “Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity”, Journal of Marketing , Vol. 57 No. 1, pp. 1-22.

Keller, K.L. (1998), Strategic Brand Management , Prentice Hall, New York, NY.

Kemp, A.E. (1985), “Psychological androgyny in musicians”, Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education , Vol. 85, Late Fall, pp. 102-108.

Lieven, T. , Grohmann, B. , Herrmann, A. , Landwehr, J.R. and van Tilburg, M. (2014), “The effect of brand gender on brand equity”, Psychology & Marketing , Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 371-385.

Lieven, T. , Grohmann, B. , Herrmann, A. , Landwehr, J.R. and van Tilburg, M. (2015), “The effect of brand design on brand gender perceptions and brand preference”, European Journal of Marketing , Vol. 49 Nos 1/2, pp. 146-169.

Macrae, C.N. and Martin, D. (2007), “A boy primed sue: feature-based processing and person construal”, European Journal of Social Psychology , Vol. 37 No. 5, pp. 793-805.

Markham, S. and Cangelosi, J. (1999), “An international study of unisex and ‘same-name’ fragrance brands”, Journal of Product & Brand Management , Vol. 8 No. 5, pp. 387-401.

Markus, H.R. and Kitayama, S. (1991), “Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation”, Psychological Review , Vol. 98 No. 2, pp. 224-253.

Palan, K.M. (2001), “Gender identity in consumer behavior research: a literature review and research agenda”, Academy of Marketing Science Review , Vol. 2001 No. 10, pp. 1-24.

Palan, K.M. , Areni, C.S. and Kiecker, P. (1999), “Reexamining masculinity, femininity, and gender identity scales”, Marketing Letters , Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 363-377.

Podsakoff, P.M. , MacKenzie, S.B. , Lee, J.-Y. and Podsakoff, N.P. (2003), “Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies”, Journal of Applied Psychology , Vol. 88 No. 5, pp. 879-903.

Rust, R.T. , Zeithaml, V.A. and Lernon, K.N. (2000), Driving Customer Equity , Free Press, New York, NY.

Snyder, M. and Swann, W.B. (1978), “Hypothesis-testing processes in social interaction”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , Vol. 36 No. 11, pp. 1202-1212.

Solberg, C.A. (2002), “The perennial issue of adaptation or standardization of international marketing communication: organizational contingencies and performance”, Journal of International Marketing , Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 1-21.

Steele, J.R. and Ambady, N. (2006), “‘Math is hard!’ The effect of gender priming on women’s attitudes”, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 428-436.

Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M. and Baumgartner, H. (1998), “Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research”, Journal of Consumer Research , Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 78-90.

Triandis, H.C. (1997), “Cross-cultural perspectives on personality”, in Hogan, R. , Johnson, J. and Briggs, S. (Eds), Handbook of Personality Psychology , Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 439-464.

Triandis, H.C. (2001), “Individualism-collectivism and personality”, Journal of Personality , Vol. 69 No. 6, pp. 907-924.

Triandis, H.C. , McCuster, C. and Hui, H. (1990), “Multimethod probes of individualism and collectivism”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , Vol. 59 No. 5, pp. 1006-1020.

Van Tilburg, M. , Lieven, T. , Herrmann, A. and Townsend, C. (2015), “Beyond ‘pink it and shrink it’: perceived product gender, aesthetics, and product evaluation”, Psychology & Marketing , Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 422-437.

Vitz, P.C. and Johnston, D. (1965), “Masculinity of smokers and the masculinity of cigarette images”, Journal of Applied Psychology , Vol. 49 No. 3, pp. 155-159.

Voorhees, C.M. , Brady, M.K. and Horawitz, D.M. (2006), “A voice from the silent masses: an exploratory and comparative analysis of noncomplainers”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science , Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 514-527.

Way, A.D. and Marques, J. (2013), “Management of gender roles: marketing the androgynous leadership style in the classroom and the general workplace”, Organization Development Journal , Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 82-94.

Whipple, Th.W. and Courtney, A.E. (1985), “Female role portrayals in advertising and communication effectiveness: a review”, Journal of Advertising , Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 4-17.

Williams, L.J. , Hartman, N. and Cavazotte, F. (2010), “Method variance and marker variables: a review and comprehensive CFA marker technique”, Organizational Research Methods , Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 477-514.

Worth, L.T. , Smith, J. and Mackie, D.M. (1992), “Gender schematicity and preference for gender-typed products”, Psychology & Marketing , Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 17-30.

EquiTrend (2013), “Harris Poll EquiTrend”, available at: www.harrisinteractive.com/Products/EquiTrend.aspx (accessed April 6, 2014).

Simon, C.J. and Sullivan, M.W. (1993), “The measurement and determinants of brand equity: a financial approach”, Marketing Science , Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 28-52.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 33 Số 2

178-195

Thông tin tác giả