The image quality, lesion detectability, and acquisition time of 18F-FDG total-body PET/CT in oncological patients

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine - Tập 47 Số 11 - Trang 2507-2515 - 2020
Yiqiu Zhang1, Pengcheng Hu1, Runze Wu2, Yushen Gu1, Shuguang Chen1, Haojun Yu1, Xiangqing Wang1, Jun Song3, Hongcheng Shi3
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, 180 Fenglin Rd., Shanghai, China
2United Imaging Research, Shanghai, China
3Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42(2):328–54.

Zhang X, Cherry SR, Xie Z, Shi H, Badawi RD, Qi J. Subsecond total-body imaging using ultrasensitive positron emission tomography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(5):2265–7.

Badawi RD, Shi H, Hu P, et al. First human imaging studies with the EXPLORER total-body PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(3):299–303.

Zhang X, Xie Z, Berg E, et al. Total-body dynamic reconstruction and parametric imaging on the uEXPLORER. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(2):285–91.

Cherry SR, Jones T, Karp JS, Qi J, Moses WW, Badawi RD, et al. Maximizing sensitivity to create new opportunities for clinical research and patient care. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(1):3–12.

Zhang X, Zhou J, Cherry SR, Badawi RD, Qi J. Quantitative image reconstruction for total-body PET imaging using the 2-meter long EXPLORER scanner. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62(6):2465–85.

Pan T, Einstein SA, Kappadath SC, et al. Performance evaluation of the 5-ring GE discovery MI PET/CT system using the national electrical manufacturers association NU 2-2012 standard. Med Phys. 2019;46(7):3025–33.

Pantel AR, Viswanath V, Daube-Witherspoon ME, et al. PennPET Explorer: human imaging on a whole-body imager. J Nucl Med. 2020;61(1):144–51.

van der Vos CS, Koopman D, Rijnsdorp S, et al. Quantification, improvement, and harmonization of small lesion detection with state-of-the-art PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(Suppl 1):4–16.

van Sluis J, Boellaard R, Dierckx RA, Stormezand G, Glaudemans AWJM, Noordzij W. Image quality and activity optimization in oncological18F-FDG PET using the digital Biograph Vision PET/CT. J Nucl Med 2019. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.234351.

Deng Z, Hu D, Ding Y, Dong Y. A comparison of image quality with uMI780 and the first total-body uEXPLORER scanner. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(Supplement 1):381.

Matheoud R, Leva L, Secco C, et al. Small lesions detectability with the Biograph 16 Hi-Rez PET/CT scanner and fast imaging protocols: performance evaluation using an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom and ROC analyses. Ann Nucl Med. 2011;25(3):179–88.

Lindemann ME, Stebner V, Tschischka A, Kirchner J, Umutlu L, Quick HH. Towards fast whole-body PET/MR: investigation of PET image quality versus reduced PET acquisition times. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0206573.

Noto B, Büther F, Auf der Springe K, et al. Impact of PET acquisition durations on image quality and lesion detectability in whole-body 68Ga-PSMA PET-MRI. EJNMMI Res. 2017;7(1):12.

Goethals I, D'Asseler Y, Dobbeleir A, Deblaere K, Ham H. The effect of acquisition time on visual and semi-quantitative analysis of F-18 FDG-PET studies in patients with head and neck cancer. Nucl Med Commun. 2010;31(3):227–31.