The ethical application of biometric facial recognition technology

Marcus Smith1, Seumas Miller2
1Centre for Law and Justice, Charles Sturt University, Canberra, Australia
2Australian Graduate School of Policing and Security, Charles Sturt University, Canberra, Australia

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Biometric facial recognition is an artificial intelligence technology involving the automated comparison of facial features, used by law enforcement to identify unknown suspects from photographs and closed circuit television. Its capability is expanding rapidly in association with artificial intelligence and has great potential to solve crime. However, it also carries significant privacy and other ethical implications that require law and regulation. This article examines the rise of biometric facial recognition, current applications and legal developments, and conducts an ethical analysis of the issues that arise. Ethical principles are applied to mediate the potential conflicts in relation to this information technology that arise between security, on the one hand, and individual privacy and autonomy, and democratic accountability, on the other. These can be used to support appropriate law and regulation for the technology as it continues to develop.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Australian National University (ANU) (2019) Incident report on the breach of the Australian national university’s administrative systems. https://www.anu.edu.au/news/all-news/anu-releases-detailed-account-of-data-breach. Accessed 31 Jan 2021

Bogle A (2020) Australian federal police officers trialled controversial facial recognition tool Clearview AI, Australian Broadcasting Corporation News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2020-04-14/clearview-ai-facial-recognition-tech-australian-federalpolice/12146894. Accessed 14 April 2020

British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) (2020a) Pyjamas in public: Chinese city apologises for ‘shaming’ residents. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-51188669. Accessed 21 Jan 2020

British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) (2020b) Twitter demands AI company stops collecting faces. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-51220654. Accessed 23 Jan 2020

Henschke A (2017) Ethics in an age of surveillance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Hill K (2020) The secretive company that might end privacy as we know it. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/18/technology/clearview-privacy-facial-recognition.html. Accessed 18 Jan 2020

House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (HCSTC), Parliament of the United Kingdom (2015) Current and future uses of biometric data and technologies. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmsctech/734/73402.htm. Accessed 7 Mar 2015

Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC) (2019) Identification systems and services. https://www.acic.gov.au/information-systems-and-services. Accessed 31 Jan 2021

Australian Government (2017) Intergovernmental agreement on identity matching services. https://www.coag.gov.au/sites/default/files/agreements/iga-identity-matching-services.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2021

Kaye K et al (2015) Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks. Eur J Hum Genet 23:141

Keenan M (2015) New $18.5 million biometrics tool to put a face on crime (Media Release, 9 September 2015). https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id:%22media/pressrel/4064462%22. Accessed 9 Sep 2015

Kleinig J et al (2011) Security and privacy. ANU Press, Canberra

Mann M, Smith M (2017) Automated facial recognition technology: recent developments and approaches to oversight. UNSW Law J 40:121

Marciano A (2019) Reframing biometric surveillance: From a means of inspection to a form of control. Ethics Inf Technol 21:127–136

Miller S, Bossomaier T (2021) Ethics and cybersecurity. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Miller S, Gordon I (2014) Investigative ethics: ethics for police detectives and criminal investigators. Blackwell, Malden

Miller S, Smith M (2021) Ethics, public health and technology responses to COVID-19. Bioethics (in press)

Miller S, Walsh P (2016) NSA, Snowden and the ethics and accountability of intelligence gathering. In: Galliott J, Reed J (eds) Ethics and the future of spying: technology, intelligence collection and national security. Routledge, New York, pp 193–204

Office of the Biometrics Commissioner (OBC) (2020) https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/biometrics-commissioner/about. Accessed 31 Jan 2021

Petrie C (2019) Bills Digest No. 21 Identity-matching Services Bill 2019 and Australian Passports Amendment (Identity-matching Services) Bill 2019, Australian Parliamentary Library, 26 August 2019

Qiang X (2019) The road to digital unfreedom: president Xi’s surveillance state. J Democr 30:53

Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security (PJCIS) (2019) Review of the identity-matching services bill 2018 and the Australian Passports Amendment (Identity-matching Services) Bill 2018. https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Joint/Intelligence_and_Security/IMSBill. Accessed 31 Jan 2021

Smith M, Mann M, Urbas G (2018) Biometrics, security and crime. Routledge, New York

Stupp C (2020) EU plans rules for facial-recognition technology. Wall Street J. https://www.wsj.com/articles/eu-plans-rules-forfacial-recognition-technology-11582219726. Accessed 20 Feb 2020

Walsh P, Miller S (2016) Rethinking ‘Five Eyes’ security intelligence collection policies and practice post Snowden. Intell Natl Secur J 31:345

Wee SL, Mozur P (2019) China uses DNA to map faces, with help from the west. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/03/business/china-dna-uighurs-xinjiang.html. Accessed 4 Dec 2019