The effects of visual information in eWOM communication

Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing - Tập 6 Số 1 - Trang 7-26 - 2012
Tom M.YLin1, Kuan‐YiLu1, Jia‐JhouWu1
1Department of Business Administration, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei City, Taiwan (ROC)

Tóm tắt

PurposeElectronic word of mouth (eWOM) is a considerably influential factor for consumers to search for product information. Nowadays, consumers can easily post visual information (e.g. pictures or videos) to convey product information and consumption‐related experiences. Yet, prior eWOM studies focused primarily on the verbal information of eWOM. Few studies have paid sufficient attention to the effects of visual information in eWOM communication. The purpose of this paper, therefore, is to employ blogs to investigate the effects of visual information on consumers' perception of eWOM message quality, credibility, product interest, and purchase intention.Design/methodology/approachThe authors conducted two empirical studies in the field of different product categories. Data were collected from subjects ranged in age from 16 to 50 (n=155 for study 1, n=309 for study 2), and analyzed using independent‐samples t test and univariate analysis of variance (ANOVA).FindingsResults show that subjects rated eWOM articles in blogs with visual information significantly higher in four areas than identical articles without visual information. Furthermore, there is an interaction effect between product category and visual information on product interest and purchase intention. Compared with experience products, when subjects read the eWOM information of search products with pictures (versus without pictures), they would generate greater product interest and purchase intention. In addition, the effect of visual information is stronger not only for search products (no matter whether utilitarian or hedonic products) but also for experience‐hedonic products than for experience‐utilitarian products.Originality/valueThe findings of this study provide useful knowledge for internet marketers to develop effective eWOM marketing and thus increase consumer trust in eWOM and intention to purchase products. Although visual information is found to be important, different product categories should take advantage of visual information in different degrees.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alon, A.T. and Brunel, F.F. (2006), “Uncovering rhetorical methods of word‐of‐mouth talk in an online community”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 33, pp. 501‐2.

Bailey, A.A. (2005), “Consumer awareness and use of product review websites”, Journal of Interactive Advertising, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 68‐81.

Bickart, B. and Schindeler, R.M. (2001), “Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 31‐40.

Brown, J., Broderick, A.J. and Lee, N. (2007), “Word of mouth communication within online communities: conceptualizing the online social network”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 2‐20.

Bucy, E.P. (2003), “Media credibility reconsidered: synergy effects between on‐air and online news”, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, Vol. 80 No. 2, pp. 247‐64.

Bushong, B., King, L.M., Camerer, C.F. and Rangel, A. (2010), “Pavlovian processes in consumer choice: the physical presence of a good increases willingness‐to‐pay”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 100 No. 4, pp. 1556‐71.

Chevalier, J.A. and Mayzlin, D. (2006), “The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 43 No. 3, pp. 345‐54.

David, A. and Glore, P. (2010), “The impact of design and aesthetics on usability, credibility, and learning in an online environment”, Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, Vol. 13 No. 4, available at: www.westga.edu/∼distance/ojdla/winter134/david_glore134.html.

Dellarocas, C. (2003), “The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms”, Management Science, Vol. 49 No. 10, pp. 1407‐24.

Dhar, R. and Wertenbroch, K. (2000), “Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 60‐71.

Fogg, B.J. and Tseng, H. (1999), “The elements of computer credibility”, paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI '99, Pittsburgh, PA, pp. 80‐7.

Fogg, B.J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D.R., Marable, L., Stanford, J. and Tauber, E.R. (2003), “How do users evaluate the credibility of web sites? A study with over 2,500 participants”, Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Designing for User Experiences, San Francisco, CA, pp. 1‐15.

Forrester Research (n.d.), Profiling European Bloggers, available at: www.forrester.com/ER/Press/Release/0,1769,1112,00.html.

Gaziano, C. and McGrath, K. (1986), “Measuring the concept of credibility”, Journalism Quarterly, Vol. 63 No. 3, pp. 451‐62.

Grewal, D., Kavanoor, S., Fern, E.F., Costley, C. and Barnes, J. (1997), “Comparative versus noncomparative advertising: a meta‐analysis”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 61 No. 4, pp. 1‐15.

Griffith, D.A. (2005), “An examination of the influences of store layout in online retailing”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58 No. 10, pp. 1391‐6.

Hantula, D.A. (2005), “Experiments in e‐commerce”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 22, pp. 103‐7.

Hennig‐Thurau, T., Gwinner, K.P., Walsh, G. and Gremler, D.D. (2004), “Electronic word‐of‐mouth via consumer‐opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet?”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 38‐72.

Hill, D. (2003), “Tell me no lies: using science to connect with consumers”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 61‐72.

Holbrook, M.B. and Moore, W.L. (1981), “Feature interactions in consumer judgments of verbal versus pictorial presentations”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 103‐13.

Hovland, C.I. and Weiss, W. (1951), “The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness”, The Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 635‐50.

Im, H., Lennon, S.J. and Stoel, L. (2010), “The perceptual fluency effect on pleasurable online shopping experience”, Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, Vol. 4 No. 4, pp. 280‐95.

Johnson, T.J. and Kaye, B.K. (2004), “Wag the blog: how reliance on traditional media and the internet influence credibility perceptions of weblogs among blog users”, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, Vol. 81 No. 3, pp. 622‐42.

Kim, J. and Moon, J.Y. (1998), “Designing towards emotional usability in customer interfaces: trustworthiness of cyber‐banking system interfaces”, Interacting with Computers, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 1‐29.

Kim, M. and Lennon, S. (2008), “The effects of visual and verbal information on attitudes and purchase intentions in internet shopping”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 146‐78.

Kisielius, J. and Sternthal, B. (1984), “Detecting and explaining vividness effects in attitudinal judgments”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. 54‐64.

Lin, T.M.Y., Luarn, P. and Huang, Y.K. (2005), “Effect of internet book reviews on purchase intention: a focus group study”, The Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 461‐8.

Lin, Y.S. and Huang, J.Y. (2006), “Internet blogs as a tourism marketing medium: a case study”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 59, pp. 1201‐5.

Lurie, N.H. and Mason, C.H. (2007), “Visual representation: implications for decision making”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 71 No. 1, pp. 160‐77.

MacInnis, D.J. and Price, L.L. (1987), “The role of imagery in information processing: review and extensions”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp. 473‐91.

Malthouse, E. and Shankar, V. (2009), “Measuring and managing interactive environments”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 207‐8.

Mandel, N. and Johnson, E.J. (2002), “When web pages influence choice: effects of visual priming on experts and novices”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 235‐45.

Mitchell, A.A. and Olson, J.C. (1981), “Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude?”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 318‐32.

Park, J., Lennon, S.J. and Stoel, L. (2005), “On‐line product presentation: effects on mood, perceived risk, and purchase intention”, Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 22 No. 9, pp. 695‐719.

Peterson, R.A., Balasubramanian, S. and Bronnenberg, B.J. (1997), “Exploring the implications of the internet for consumer marketing”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 329‐46.

Pew Research Center's Internet and American Life Project Trend Data: Daily Internet Activities (2001‐2009), available at: www.pewInternet.org/Trend‐Data/Online‐Activites‐Total.aspx (accessed 4 December 2009).

Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Friedman, E. and Kuwabara, K. (2000), “Reputation systems: facilitating trust in internet interactions”, Communication of the ACM, Vol. 43 No. 12, pp. 45‐8.

Shepard, R.N. (1967), “Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures”, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 156‐63.

Slater, M.D. and Rouner, D. (1996), “How message evaluation and source attributes may influence credibility assessment and belief change”, Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, Vol. 73 No. 4, pp. 974‐91.

Staats, A.W. and Lohr, J.M. (1979), “Images, language, emotions and personality: social behaviorism's theory”, Journal of Mental Imagery, Vol. 3, pp. 85‐106.

Starch, D. (1966), “How does the shape of ads affect readership?”, Media/ Scope, Vol. 10, pp. 83‐5.

Sundar, S.S. (1998), “Effect of source attribution on perception of online news stories”, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, Vol. 75 No. 1, pp. 55‐68.

Then, N.K. and DeLong, M.R. (1999), “Apparel shopping on the web”, Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, Vol. 91 No. 3, pp. 65‐8.

Xia, L. and Bechwati, N.N. (2008), “Word of mouse: the role of cognitive personalization in online consumer reviews”, Journal of Interactive Advertising, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 3‐13.

Strahilevitz, M. and Myers, J.G. (1998), “Donations to charity as purchase incentives: how well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 434‐46.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing

Tập 6 Số 1

7-26

Thông tin tác giả