The effectiveness of a mediation program in symmetrical versus asymmetrical neighbor‐to‐neighbor conflicts

Emerald - Tập 23 Số 4 - Trang 440-457 - 2012
Elze G.Ufkes1, EllenGiebels2, SabineOtten1, Karen I.van der Zee1
1Department of Social Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
2Department of Psychology of Conflict, Risk & Safety, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe last decades, neighborhood mediation programs have become an increasingly popular method to deal with conflicts between neighbors. In the current paper the aim is to propose and show that conflict asymmetry, the degree to which parties differ in perceptions of the level of conflict, may be important for the course and outcomes of neighborhood mediation.Design/methodology/approachData for testing the hypotheses were based on coding all (261) files of neighbor conflicts reported to a Dutch neighborhood mediation program in the period from 2006 through 2008.FindingsAs expected, cases were more often about asymmetrical than symmetrical conflicts. Moreover, compared to symmetrical conflicts, asymmetrical conflicts less often led to a mediation session; the degree of escalation was lower; and, particularly in asymmetrical conflicts, a mere intake session already contributed to positive conflict outcomes.Originality/valuePast research on the effectiveness of mediation programs mainly focused on cases in which a mediation session effectively took place. However, persuading parties to participate in a mediation session forms a major challenge for mediators. In fact, many cases that are signed‐up for mediation programs do not result in an actual mediation. The current study examines the entire mediation process – from intake to follow‐up.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

ADRNOW (2010), “Community mediation”, available at: www.adrnow.org.uk/go/SubPage_ 48.html.

Alberts, J.K., Heisterkamp, B.L. and McPhee, R.M. (2005), “Disputant perceptions of and satisfaction with a community mediation program”, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 16, pp. 218‐44.

Charkoudian, L. (2005), “A quantitative analysis of the effectiveness of community mediation in decreasing repeat police calls for service”, Conflict Resolution Quarterly, Vol. 23, pp. 87‐98.

De Dreu, C., Kluwer, E. and Nauta, A. (2008), “The structure and management of conflict: fighting or defending the status quo”, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 11, pp. 331‐53.

Fiers, L.M.J. and Jansen, A. (2004), “Het succes van buurtbemiddeling. Resultaten van het evaluatieonderzoek (‘The success of neighborhood mediation. Results from the evaluation study’)”, available at: www.hetccv.nl/binaries/content/assets/ccv/dossiers/samenleven‐en‐wonen/buurtbemiddeling/succes_van_buurtbemiddeling.pdf.

Gabel, S. (2003), “Mediation and psychotherapy: two sides of the same coin”, Negotiation Journal, Vol. 19, pp. 315‐28.

Gewurz, I.G. (2001), “(Re) Designing mediation to address the nuances of power imbalance”, Conflict Resolution Quarterly, Vol. 19, pp. 135‐61.

Giebels, E. and Janssen, O. (2005), “Conflict stress and reduced wellbeing at work: the buffering effect of third‐party help”, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 14, pp. 137‐55.

Giebels, E. and Taylor, P. (2009), “Interaction patterns in crisis negotiations: persuasive arguments and cultural differences”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 94, pp. 5‐19.

Giebels, E. and Yang, H. (2009), “Preferences for third‐party help in workplace conflict: a cross‐cultural comparison of Chinese and Dutch employees”, Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, Vol. 2, pp. 344‐62.

Jehn, K.A. and Chatman, J.A. (2000), “The influence of proportional and perceptual conflict composition on team performance”, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 11, pp. 56‐73.

Jehn, K.A. and Rispens, S. (2008), “Conflict in workgroups”, in Cooper, C.L. and Barling, J. (Eds), Handbook of Organizational Behavior, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 262‐76.

Jehn, K.A., Rispens, S. and Thatcher, S.M. (2010), “The effects of conflict asymmetry on workgroup and individual outcomes”, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 53, pp. 596‐616.

Jehn, K.A., Rupert, J. and Nauta, A. (2006), “The effects of conflict asymmetry on mediation outcomes: satisfaction, work motivation and absenteeism”, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 17, pp. 96‐109.

Kluwer, E. and Mikula, G. (2002), “Gender‐related inequalities in the division of family work in close relationships: a social psychological perspective”, European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 13, pp. 185‐216.

Kruerger, P. (2010), “Neighborhood feud turned fatal: deputies”, NBC San Diego, available at: www.nbcsandiego.com/news/local‐beat/Neighborhood‐Fued‐Turned‐Fatal‐Deputies‐89997827.html.

Le Post (2009), “Quadruple meurtre du Raincy: ‘C'est un drame du voisinage’”, Le Post, available at: www.lepost.fr/article/2009/10/11/1736176_quadruple‐meurtre‐du‐raincy‐c‐est‐un‐drame‐du‐voisinage.html.

McGillicuddy, N.B., Pruitt, D.G., Welton, G.L., Zubek, J.M. and Peirce, R.S. (1991), “Factors affecting the outcome of mediation: third‐party and disputant behavior”, in Duffy, K.G., Grosch, J.W. and Olczak, P.V. (Eds), Community Mediation: A Handbook for Practitioners and Researchers, Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp. 137‐49.

Mummendey, A. and Otten, S. (1989), “Perspective‐specific differences in the evaluation of aggressive interaction sequences”, European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 19, pp. 23‐40.

National Association for Conflict Management (2010), “Community mediation program statistics”, available at: www.nafcm.org/pg5.cfm.

Neuendorf, K.A. (2002), The Content Analysis Guidebook, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Paquin, G. and Gambrill, E. (1994), “The problem with neighbors”, Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 22, pp. 21‐32.

Poitras, J. (2005), “A study of the emergence of cooperation in mediation”, Negotiation Journal, Vol. 21, pp. 281‐300.

Poitras, J. (2007), “The paradox of accepting one's share of responsibility in mediation”, Negotiation Journal, Vol. 23, pp. 267‐82.

Pruitt, D.G. (1995), “Process and outcome in community mediation”, Negotiation Journal, Vol. 11, pp. 365‐77.

Pruitt, D. and Carnevale, P. (1993), Negotiation in Social Conflict, Thomson Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Belmont, CA.

Ray, L. (1997), “Community mediation centers: delivering first‐class services to low‐income people for the past twenty years”, Mediation Quarterly, Vol. 15, pp. 71‐7.

Rubin, J., Pruitt, D. and Kim, S. (1994), Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement, 2nd ed., McGraw‐Hill Book Company, New York, NY.

Salancik, G. and Pfeffer, J. (1978), “A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 23, pp. 224‐53.

Searle, J.R. (1997), “Replies to critics of the construction of social reality”, History of the Human Sciences, Vol. 10, pp. 103‐10.

Sheppard, B.H. (1984), “Third party conflict intervention: a procedural framework”, in Staw, B.M. and Cummings, L.L. (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 141‐90.

Simons, T. and Peterson, R. (2000), “Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 85, pp. 102‐11.

Swann, W.B. (1999), Resilient Identities: Self, Relationships, and the Construction of Social Reality, Basic Books, New York, NY.

Tyler, T.R. (1999), “Why people cooperate with organizations: an identity based perspective”, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21, pp. 201‐46.

Van de Vliert, E. (1997), Complex Interpersonal Conflict Behaviour: Theoretical Frontiers, Psychology Press, Hove.

Welton, G.L., Pruitt, D.G. and McGillicuddy, N.B. (1988), “The role of caucusing in community mediation”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 32, pp. 181‐202.

Zubek, J.M., Pruitt, D.G., Peirce, R.S., McGillicuddy, N.B. and Syna, H. (1992), “Disputant and mediator behaviors affecting short‐term success in mediation”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 36, pp. 546‐72.

Zumeta, Z. (2000), “A facilitative mediator responds”, Journal of Dispute Resolution, Vol. 28, pp. 335‐41.

Heavey, C.L., Layne, C. and Christensen, A. (1993), “Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: a replication and extension”, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 61, pp. 16‐27.

Pruitt, D., Parker, J. and Mikolic, J. (1997), “Escalation as a reaction to persistent annoyance”, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 8, pp. 252‐70.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 23 Số 4

440-457

Thông tin tác giả