The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology

Journal of Biogeography - Tập 26 Số 4 - Trang 867-878 - 1999
Jeffrey C. Nekola1, Peter S. White1
11Curriculum in Ecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, U.S.A.

Tóm tắt

Summary

AimOur aim was to understand how similarity changes with distance in biological communities, to use the distance decay perspective as quantitative technique to describe biogeographic pattern, and to explore whether growth form, dispersal type, rarity, or support affected the rate of distance decay in similarity.

LocationNorth American spruce‐fir forests, Appalachian montane spruce‐fir forests.

MethodsWe estimated rates of distance decay through regression of log‐transformed compositional similarity against distance for pairwise comparisons of thirty‐four white spruce plots and twenty‐six black spruce plots distributed from eastern Canada to Alaska, six regional floras along the crest of the Appalachians, and six regional floras along the east–west extent of the boreal forest.

ResultsSimilarity decreased significantly with distance, with the most linear models relating the log of similarity to untransformed distance. The rate of similarity decay was 1.5–1.9 times higher for vascular plants than for bryophytes. The rate of distance decay was highest for berry‐fruited and nut‐bearing species (1.7 times higher than plumose‐seeded species and 1.9 times higher than microseeded/spore species) and 2.1 times higher for herbs than woody plants. There was no distance decay for rare species, while species of intermediate frequency had 2.0 times higher distance decay rates than common species. The rate of distance decay was 2.7 times higher for floras from the fragmented Appalachians than for floras from the contiguous boreal forest.

Main conclusionsThe distance decay of similarity can be caused by either a decrease in environmental similarity with distance (e.g. climatic gradients) or by limits to dispersal and niche width differences among taxa. Regardless of cause, the distance decay of similarity provides a simple descriptor of how biological diversity is distributed and therefore has consequences for conservation strategy.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Allen T.F.H&Hoekstra T.W.1991Role of heterogeneity in scaling of ecological systems under analysis.Ecological heterogeneity(ed. by J. Kolasa and S.T.A. Pickett) pp.47‐68. Ecological Studies 86.Springer‐Verlag New York.

Bennett D.G&Gade O.1979Geographic perspectives in migration research. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Department of Geography Studies in Geography Number 12.

10.2307/2845239

10.2307/1935620

10.1080/10106048609354060

10.2307/2845404

Cain S.A, 1944, Foundations of plant geography

Christensen N.L, 1984, Forest succession: concepts and application, 230

Cody M.L, 1985, Ecology and evolution of communities, 214

10.1007/BF00032629

10.2307/1942237

10.1002/9781119115151

Curtis J.T, 1959, The vegetation of Wisconsin

10.1080/02693799008941529

10.2307/2845505

10.1007/BF00038687

10.1007/BF00131540

10.1080/00045602209356938

Grigal D.F.1968The relationship between plants communities and soils in northeastern Minnesota. PhD Dissertation University of Minnesota Minneapolis.

10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00548.x

Hubbell S.P, 1995, Preparing for global change: a midwestern perspective, 173

10.3733/hilg.v27n14p343

10.1139/z89-108

10.2307/1940467

Lakela O, 1965, A flora of northeastern Minnesota

10.2307/1948439

10.1139/b76-065

MacArthur R.H, 1972, Geographical ecology

10.1007/978-1-4899-2995-2

10.2307/1933844

10.1139/b61-115

10.2307/1942179

10.1007/978-94-009-1199-4_1

Mueller‐Dombois D, 1974, Aims and methods of vegetation ecology

10.1038/325430a0

Nicholson S Holway J.G Scott J.T.1969A floristic comparison of undisturbed spruce‐fir forests of the Adirondacks with four other regions. Atm. Sci. Res. Center State U. of N.Y. at Albany. Rept. 92.

Odland J, 1988, Spatial autocorrelation

Ohmann L.F&Ream R.R.1971Wilderness ecology: virgin plant communities of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area.North Central For. Exp. Sta. Rept. NC‐63. St. Paul Minnesota.

10.2307/1937537

Olea R.A, 1991, Geostatistical glossary and multilingual dictionary, 10.1093/oso/9780195066890.001.0001

10.2307/1930974

Openshaw S.1983The modifiable areal unit problem. Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography No. 38.Geobooks Norwich England.

10.1007/BF00044631

10.1086/285704

Palmgren A.1926Chance as an element in plant geography.Proceedings of the International Congress of Plant Sciences Ithaca New York(ed. by B.M. Duggar) pp.591‐602.George Banta Publishing Company Menasha Wisconsin.

10.1111/j.1523-1739.1987.tb00052.x

10.2307/1931976

Ramseur G.S, 1960, The vascular flora of the high mountain communities of the southern Appalachians, J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc, 76, 82

10.1017/CBO9780511624131

Roughgarden J, 1987, Organization of communities: past and present, 491

Saur J.D, 1988, Plant migration, 10.1525/9780520909861

Schluter D, 1993, Species diversity in ecological communities, 1

Schoenwald‐Cox C, 1983, Genetics and conservation, 414

Shafer C, 1990, Nature reserves: Island theory and conservation practice

10.1007/BF00044894

10.2307/2845026

10.2307/2937033

10.1126/science.191.4224.285

Stohlgren T.J&Quinn J.F.1991Evaluating the contribution of northern California National Park areas to regional biodiversity.Proceedings of the Symposium on Biodiversity of Northwestern California 226‐232.

Tilman D, 1988, Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communities

10.2307/143141

10.1086/282671

Webster R, 1990, Statistical methods in soil and land resource survey

10.2307/2845480

10.2307/2389612

10.1086/283120

White P.S.1982The flora of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park: an annotated checklist of the vascular plants and a review of previous floristic work.USDI National Park Service Southeast Regional Office Res./Resource Manage. Rept. SER‐55.

10.2307/2260463

Whittaker R.H, 1975, Communities and ecosystems

10.5962/bhl.title.70451

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Biogeography

Tập 26 Số 4

867-878

Thông tin tác giả