The diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin and C‐reactive protein for sepsis: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Journal of Cellular Biochemistry - Tập 120 Số 4 - Trang 5852-5859 - 2019
Meichun Tan1, Yunxia Lü1, Hao Jiang1, Liandong Zhang1
1Department of Emergency (EICU) Shanghai Baoshan Traditional Chinese Medicine—Integrated Hospital Shanghai China

Tóm tắt

AbstractBackgroundThe objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the clinical value of procalcitonin and C‐reactive protein in the diagnosis of adult patients with sepsis.MethodPubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Wanfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and VIP database were searched by the index words to identify the qualified prospective studies, and relevant literature sources were also searched. The most recent research was done in the April 2017. The only languages included were English or Chinese. In the experiment group, patients were diagnosed with sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock; in the control group, the patients were of noninfectious origin or a systemic inflammatory response syndrome. The diagnostic accuracy was analyzed by heterogeneity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and the summary receiver‐operating characteristic curve.ResultsAt least nine studies were involved in the meta‐analysis with 495 patients in the sepsis group and 873 patients in the nonsepsis group. In terms of the diagnostic accuracy of C‐reactive protein (CRP) for sepsis, the overall area under the summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69‐0.77), with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.63‐0.90) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.50‐0.72) respectively, and the DOR was 6.89 (95% CI, 3.86‐12.31). In terms of the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT) for sepsis, the overall area under the SROC curve was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.82‐0.88), with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69‐0.87) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.60‐0.88) respectively, and the DOR was 12.50 (95% CI, 3.65‐42.80).ConclusionIn this meta‐analysis, our results together indicate a moderate degree of value of PCT and CRP for the diagnosis of sepsis in adult patients. The diagnosis accuracy and specificity of PCT are higher than those of CRP.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2119/molmed.2010.00001.commentary

10.1378/chest.101.6.1644

10.1097/01.CCM.0000261890.41311.E9

10.1152/physrev.00037.2012

10.1093/jac/dkm460

10.7326/0003-4819-113-3-227

10.7326/0003-4819-113-7-495

10.1086/514153

10.1007/BF01705408

10.1038/nm0712-999

10.1097/01.CCM.0000226413.54364.36

10.1177/0300060514528483

10.4103/2278-330X.119913

10.1186/cc2877

10.1186/1471-2334-7-137

10.1186/1471-2334-12-157

10.1007/s12072-014-9540-x

10.1186/1471-2253-13-23

10.1186/s13613-016-0153-5

10.1016/j.burns.2013.08.024

Ríostoro JJ, 2017, Soluble membrane receptors, interleukin 6, procalcitonin and C reactive protein as prognostic markers in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock, PLoS One, 12, e0175254, 10.1371/journal.pone.0175254

10.1136/adc.81.5.417

10.1172/JCI200318921

10.1097/01.CCM.0000063440.19188.ED

Jiang X‐G, 2009, The clinical significance of serum procalcitonin and C‐reactive protein in sepsis, Chin J Respir Crit Care Med, 8, 429

Chengfen Y, 2015, Accuracy of procalcitonin for diagnosis of sepsis in adults: a meta‐analysis, Chin Crit Care Med, 27, 743

10.1371/journal.pone.0129450

10.1186/cc13157

10.1186/s40064-016-3591-5