The construction of shale rock physics model and brittleness prediction for high-porosity shale gas-bearing reservoir

Elsevier BV - Tập 17 - Trang 658-670 - 2020
Xin-Peng Pan1,2, Guang-Zhi Zhang2, Jiao-Jiao Chen2
1School of Geoscience and Info-Physics, Central South University, Changsha, China
2School of Geoscience, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, China

Tóm tắt

Due to the huge differences between the unconventional shale and conventional sand reservoirs in many aspects such as the types and the characteristics of minerals, matrix pores and fluids, the construction of shale rock physics model is significant for the exploration and development of shale reservoirs. To make a better characterization of shale gas-bearing reservoirs, we first propose a new but more suitable rock physics model to characterize the reservoirs. We then use a well A to demonstrate the feasibility and reliability of the proposed rock physics model of shale gas-bearing reservoirs. Moreover, we propose a new brittleness indicator for the high-porosity and organic-rich shale gas-bearing reservoirs. Based on the parameter analysis using the constructed rock physics model, we finally compare the new brittleness indicator with the commonly used Young’s modulus in the content of quartz and organic matter, the matrix porosity, and the types of filled fluids. We also propose a new shale brittleness index by integrating the proposed new brittleness indicator and the Poisson’s ratio. Tests on real data sets demonstrate that the new brittleness indicator and index are more sensitive than the commonly used Young’s modulus and brittleness index for the high-porosity and high-brittleness shale gas-bearing reservoirs.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alzate JH, Devegowda D. Integration of surface seismic, microseismic, and production logs for shale gas characterization: methodology and field application. Interpretation. 2013;1(2):SB37–49. https://doi.org/10.1190/int-2013-0025.1. Ba J, Yan XF, Chen ZY, et al. Rock physics model and gas saturation inversion for heterogeneous gas reservoirs. Chin J Geophys. 2013;56(5):1696–706. https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg20130527(in Chinese). Bandyopadhyay K, Sain R, Liu E, et al. Rock property inversion in organic-rich shale: uncertainties, ambiguities, and pitfalls. SEG Tech Program Expand Abstr. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2012-0932.1. Bayuk IO, Ammerman M, Chesnokov EM. Upscaling of elastic properties of anisotropic sedimentary rocks. Geophys J Int. 2008;172:842–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2007.03645.x. Berryman JG. Long-wavelength propagation in composite elastic media. Acoust Soc Am. 1980;68:1809–31. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.385171. Berryman JG. Mixture theories for rock properties. In: Ahrens TJ, editor. Rock physics and phase relations, a handbook of physical constants. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union; 1995. p. 205–28. https://doi.org/10.1029/rf003p0205. Budiansky B. On the elastic moduli of some heterogeneous materials. J Mech Phys Solids. 1965;13:223–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(65)90011-6. Chen JJ, Zhang GZ, Chen HZ, et al. The construction of shale rock physics effective model and prediction of rock brittleness. SEG Tech Program Expand Abstr. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2014-0716.1. Ding WL, Li C, Li CY, et al. Dominant factor of fracture development in shale and its relationship to gas accumulation. Earth Sci Front. 2012;19(2):212–20 (in Chinese). Dong DZ, Zou CN, Li JZ, et al. The resource potential and exploration prospect of shale gas. Geol Bull China. 2011;30(2–3):324–36 (in Chinese). Fu YQ, Ma FM, Zeng LX. The key technology of shale gas reservoir fracturing experiments evaluation. Nat Gas Ind. 2011;31(4):51–4 (in Chinese). Gassmann F. Über die Elastizitat poröser Medien. Vier.der Natur. Geselschaft in Zürich. 1951;96:1–23. Goodway B. AVO and Lamé constants for rock parameterization and fluid detection. CSEG Rec. 2001;6:39–60. Goodway B, Perez M, Varsek J, et al. Seismic petrophysics and isotropic-anisotropic AVO methods for unconventional gas exploration. Lead Edge. 2010;29(12):1500–8. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3525367. Grieser W, Bray J. Identification of production potential in unconventional reservoir. SPE production and operations symposium, SPE. 2007;10662. https://doi.org/10.2118/106623-ms. Hill R. A self-consistent mechanics of composite materials. J Mech Phys Solids. 1965;13:213–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5096(65)90010-4. Hornby BE, Schwartz LM, Hudson JA. Anisotropic effective-medium modeling of the elastic properties of shales. Geophysics. 1994;59:1570–83. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443546. Jiang WL, Zhao SP, Zhang JC, et al. The comparison of main controlling factors between coalbed methane and shale gas gathering. Nat Gas Geosci. 2010;2(6):1057–60 (in Chinese). Keys RG, Xu SY. An approximation for the Xu-White velocity model. Geophysics. 2002;67:1406–14. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1512786. King MS. Rock-physics developments in seismic exploration: a personal 50-year perspective. Geophysics. 2005;70(6):3–8. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2107947. Li WG, Yang SL, Yin DD, et al. A review of shale gas development technology and strategy. Nat Gas Oil. 2011;29(1):34–7 (in Chinese). Li QH, Chen M, Jin Y, et al. Rock mechanical properties and brittleness evaluation of shale gas reservoir. Pet Drill Tech. 2012;40(4):17–22 (in Chinese). Liu ZS, Sun ZD. New brittleness indexes and their application in shale/clay gas reservoir prediction. Pet Explor Dev. 2015;42(1):129–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1876-3804(15)60016-7. Liu C, Fu W, Guo ZQ, et al. Rock physics inversion for anisotropic shale reservoirs based on Bayesian scheme. Chin J Geophys. 2018;61(6):2589–600. https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg2018L0176(in Chinese). Ma SF, Han DK, Gan LD, et al. A review of seismic rock physics models. Prog Geophys. 2010;25(2):460–71 (in Chinese). Mavko G, Mukerji T, Dvorkin J. The rock physics handbook tools for seismic analysis of porous media. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009. Nie HK, Zhang JC. Types and characteristics of shale gas reservoir: a case study of Lower Paleozoic in and around Sichuan Basin. Pet Geol Exp. 2011;33(2):219–32 (in Chinese). Pan XP, Zhang GZ, Yin XY. Estimation of effective geostress parameters driven by anisotropic stress and rock physics models with orthorhombic symmetry. J Geophys Eng. 2017;14:1124–37. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2140/aa6f6b. Pan XP, Zhang GZ, Yin XY. Seismic scattering inversion for anisotropy in heterogeneous orthorhombic media. Chin J Geophys. 2018a;61(1):267–83. https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg2018K0609(in Chinese). Pan XP, Zhang GZ, Yin XY. Probabilistic seismic inversion for reservoir fracture and petrophysical parameters driven by rock-physics models. Chin J Geophys. 2018b;61(2):683–96. https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg2018K0759(in Chinese). Pan XP, Zhang GZ. Amplitude variation with incident angle and azimuth inversion for Young’s impedance, Poisson’s ratio, and fracture weaknesses in shale gas reservoirs. Geophys Prospect. 2019;67:1898–911. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12783. Perez R, Marfurt K. Brittleness estimation from seismic measurements in unconventional reservoirs: application to the Barnett Shale. SEG Tech Program Expand Abstr. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2013-0006.1. Qian KR, Zhang F, Chen SQ, et al. A rock physics model for analysis of anisotropic parameters in a shale reservoir in Southwest China. J Geophys Eng. 2016;13:19–34. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-2132/13/1/19. Qian KR, He ZL, Chen YQ, et al. Prediction of brittleness based on anisotropic rock physics model for kerogen-rick shale. Appl Geophys. 2017;14(4):463–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-017-0640-y. Ruppel SC, Loucks RG. Black mudrocks: lessons and questions from the Mississippian Barnett Shale in the southern Midcontinent. Sediment Rec. 2008;6(2):4–8. https://doi.org/10.2110/sedred.2008.2.4. Sharma RK, Chopra S. New attribute for determination of lithology and brittleness. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2012;10:45–7. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2012-1389.1. Wang ZJ. Fundamentals of seismic rock physics. Geophysics. 2001;66(2):398–412. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444931. Wang X, Liu YH, Zhang M, et al. The study of shale gas forming conditions and affecting factors. Nat Gas Geosci. 2010;21(2):350–5 (in Chinese). Wu X, Chapmann M, Li XY, et al. Anisotropic elastic modeling for organic shales. EAGE Tech Program Expand Abstr. 2012. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20148651. Xu S, Payne MA. Modeling elastic properties in carbonate rocks. Lead Edge. 2009;28:66–74. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.3064148. Yu BS. Particularity of shale gas reservoir and its evaluation. Earth Sci Front. 2012;19(3):252–8 (in Chinese). Zhang GZ, Chen JJ, Chen HZ, et al. Prediction for in situ formation stress of shale based on rock physics equivalent model. Chin J Geophys. 2015a;58(6):2112–22. https://doi.org/10.6038/cjg20150625(in Chinese). Zhang GZ, Pan XP, Sun CL, et al. Seismic fluid identification using a nonlinear elastic impedance inversion method based on a fast Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Pet Sci. 2015b;12:406–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-015-0046-5. Zhu Y, Xu S, Payne M, et al. Improved rock-physics model for shale gas. SEG Tech Program Expand Abstr. 2012. https://doi.org/10.1190/segam2012-0927.1.