The analytic network process for the pharmaceutical sector: Multi criteria decision making to select the suitable method for the preparation of nanoparticles
Tóm tắt
This paper presents the methodology for assessing and selecting the most appropriate procedure for the preparation of nanoparticles by implementing the analytical network process. The commonly utilized nanoparticle preparation methods are Polymer Precipitation, Interfacial polymer deposition, Complex Coacervation, Cross linking, Emulsion solvent diffusion, Homogenization and Polymerization method. There are numerous parameters to be considered in groundwork of nanoparticles that departs the conclusion manufacturer in bias. One has to address a number of components in alignment to determine and choose the optimum conclusion choices, because an unsuitable conclusion could lead to the eventual merchandise having to be formulated and developed again. For this cause in this paper, we study selecting the most appropriate procedure for the preparation of nanoparticles utilizing one of the multi criteria-decision making techniques, Analytic Network Process. The main goal was determined. The criteria and sub-criteria that affect the main goal were determined. The alternatives for the problem were determined. The interactions between criteria, sub-criteria, and alternatives respect to the main goal were determined. The super matrixes according to the network were assembled and then weighted super matrix and limit super matrix were then constructed. The values of this limit matrix are the desired priorities of the elements with respect to the goal. The alterative with the highest priority was finally chosen as the best alternative. The emulsion solvent diffusion technique (M-5) has the highest value (0.434379) among the alternative methods that are applicable to the preparation of the nanoparticles. The second highest is Polymer Precipitation (M-1) with a value of 0.178798, and the lowest value or last choice is Cross Linking (M-4) with a value of only 0.024516. The alternative with the highest priority would achieve the goal, i.e., the best method for the preparation of the nanoparticles. The alternative M5 emulsion solvent diffusion technique, scoring 0.434379 was the one with largest main concern amidst all the other alternatives and thereby judged to be the most apt procedure for the preparation of nanoparticles.
Tài liệu tham khảo
DiMasi JA, Bryant NR, Lasagna L: New drug development in the United States from 1963 to 1990. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1991, 50: 471-486. 10.1038/clpt.1991.172.
DiMasi JA, Hansen HW, Grabowski HG: The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. J Health Econ. 2003, 22: 151-185. 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00126-1.
Rawlins MD: Cutting the cost of drug development?. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004, 3: 360-364. 10.1038/nrd1347.
Service RF: Surviving the blockbuster syndrome. Science. 2004, 303: 1796-1799. 10.1126/science.303.5665.1796.
Hodgson J: ADMET-turning chemicals into drugs. Nat Biotechnol. 2001, 19: 722-726. 10.1038/90761.
Abu-Izza KA, Garcia-Contreras L, Lu DR: Preparation and evaluation of zidovudine-loaded sustained-release microspheres: optimization of multiple response variables. J Pharm Sci. 1996, 85: 572-576. 10.1021/js960021k.
Abu-Izza KA, Garcia-Contreras L, Lu DR: Preparation and evaluation of sustained release AZT-loaded microspheres: optimization of the release characteristics using response surface methodology. J Pharm Sci. 1996, 85: 144-149. 10.1021/js950353+.
Babazadeh M: Synthesis and study of controlled release of ibuprofen from the new acrylic type polymers. Int J Pharm. 2006, 316: 68-73. 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.02.032.
You J, Cui FD, Han X, Wang YS, Yang L, Yu YW, Li QP: Study of the preparation of sustained-release microspheres containing zedoary turmeric oil by the emulsion-solvent-diffusion method and evaluation of the self-emulsification and bioavailability of the oil. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2006, 48: 35-41. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.12.011.
Banker GS, Rhodes CT: Modern pharmaceutics. 2004, New York: Marcel Dekker
Gohel MC, Amin AF: Formulation optimization of controlled release diclofenac sodium microspheres using factorial design. J Control Release. 1998, 51: 115-122. 10.1016/S0168-3659(97)00102-8.
Jain SK, Awasthi AM, Jain N, Agrawal GP: Calcium silicate based microspheres of repaglinide for gastroretentive floating drug delivery: preparation and in vitro characterization. J Control Release. 2005, 107: 300-309. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2005.06.007.
Molpeceres J, Guzman M, Aberturas MR, Chacon M, Berges L: Application of central composite designs to the preparation of polycaprolactone nanoparticles by solvent displacement. J Pharm Sci. 1996, 85: 206-213. 10.1021/js950164r.
Li VH, Wood RW, Kreuter J, Harmia T, Robinson JR: Ocular drug delivery of progesterone using nanoparticles. J Microencapsul. 1986, 3: 213-218. 10.3109/02652048609031575.
Bertling WM, Garies M, Paspaleeva V, Zimer A, Kreuter J, Numberg E, Harrer P: Use of liposomes, viral capsids, and nanoparticles as DNA carriers. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 1989, 13: 390-405.
Climaco J: Multicriteria analysis. 1997, New York: Springer-Verlag
Pohekar SD, Ramachandran M: Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning-A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2004, 8: 365-381. 10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007.
Mikhailov L, Singh MG: Fuzzy analytic network process and its application to the development of decision support systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern. 2003, 33: 33-41.
Promentilla MA, Furuichi T, Ishii K, Tanikawa N: A fuzzy analytic network process for multi-criteria evaluation of contaminated site remedial countermeasures. J Environ Manage. 2008, 88: 479-495. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.03.013.
Velmurugan R, Selvamuthukumar S, Manavalan R: Multi criteria decision making to select the suitable method for the preparation of nanoparticles using an analytical hierarchy process. Pharmazie. 2011, 66: 836-842.
Promentilla MAB, Furuichi T, Ishii K, Tanikawa N: Evaluation of remedial countermeasures using the analytic network process. Waste Manag. 2006, 26: 1410-1421. 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.11.020.
Mikhailov L: Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements. Fuzzy Set Syst. 2003, 134: 365-385. 10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00383-4.
Saaty T: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: Analytic Network Process. 2011, Pittsburgh: RWS Publications
Saaty T: Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process. Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks. 2005, Pittsburgh: RWS Publications
Saaty T: Rank from comparisons and from ratings in the analytic hierarchy/ network processes. Eur J Oper Res. 2006, 168: 557-570. 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.032.
Mohanty RP, Agarwal R, Choudhury AK: A Fuzzy ANP– based approach to R&D project selection: A case study. Int J Prod Res. 2005, 43: 5199-5216. 10.1080/00207540500219031.
Yellepeddi S: An Analytic Network Process (ANP) approach for the development of a reverse supply chain performance index in consumer electronics industry. 2006, University of Texas: PhD thesis
Ertay T, Buyukozkan G, Kahraman C: Quality function deployment implementation based on Analytic Network Process with linguistic data: An application in automotive industry. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2005, 16: 221-232.
Ayag Z, Ozdemir RG: An intelligent approach to ERP software selection through fuzzy ANP. Int J Prod Res. 2007, 45: 2169-2194. 10.1080/00207540600724849.
Saaty T, Shih TS: Structures in decision making: On the subjective geometry of hierarchies and networks. Eur J Oper Res. 2009, 199: 867-872. 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.064.
Saaty T: Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: The Analytic Network Process. 1996, Pittsburgh: RWS Publications