The Use of Representations when Solving Algebra Word Problems and the Sources of Solution Errors

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 20 Số 5 - Trang 1037-1056 - 2022
Carlos Soneira Calvo1
1Department of Pedagogy and Didactics, Educational Sciences Faculty, University of A Coruña, Campus de Elviña, A Coruña, Spain

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16, 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001.

Barbieri, C. A., Miller-Cotto, D., & Booth, J. L. (2019). Lessening the load of misconceptions: Design-based principles for algebra learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(3), 381–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1573428.

Bassok, M. (1990). Transfer of domain-specific problem-solving procedures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(3), 522–533. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.3.522.

Bieda, K. N., & Nathan, M. J. (2009). Representational disfluency in algebra: Evidence from student gestures and speech. ZDM Mathematics Education, 41, 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0198-0.

Clement, J. (1982). Algebra word problem solutions: Thought processes underlying a common misconception. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13(1), 16–30.

Ding, M., Chen, W., & Hassler, R. S. (2019). Linear quantity models in US and Chinese elementary mathematics classrooms. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 21(2), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2019.1570834.

Ding, M., & Li, X. (2014). Transition from concrete to abstract representations: The distributive property in a Chinese textbook series. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 87, 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9558-y.

Duval, R. (2017). Understanding the mathematical way of thinking - The registers of semiotic representations. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Edens, K., & Potter, E. (2008). How students “unpack” the structure of a word problem: Graphic representations and problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, 108(5), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2008.tb17827.x.

Filloy, E., Rojano, T., & Puig, L. (2008). Educational algebra. A theoretical and empirical approach. New York: Springer.

Hegarty, M., & Kozhevnikov, M. (1999). Types of visual-spatial representations and mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 684–689. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.684.

Jones, I., & Pratt, D. (2012). A substituting meaning for the equals sign in arithmetic notating tasks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(1), 2–33. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.43.1.0002.

Kang, R., & Liu, D. (2018). The importance of multiple representations of mathematical problems: Evidence from Chinese preservice elementary teachers’ analysis of a learning goal. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(1), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9760-8.

Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(3), 317–326.

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension. A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kirshner, D. (1989). The visual syntax of algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 274–287. https://doi.org/10.2307/749516.

Kirshner, D., & Awtry, T. (2004). Visual salience of algebraic transformations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35, 224–257. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034809.

Koedinger, K. R., & Nathan, M. J. (2004). The real story behind story problems: Effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(2), 129–164. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1302_1.

Krawec, J. L. (2014). Problem representation and mathematical problem solving of students of varying math ability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219412436976.

Landy, D., Brookes, D., & Smount, R. (2014). Abstract numeric relations and the visual structure of algebra. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Leaning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(5), 1404–1418. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036823.

Mayer, R. E. (2003). Learning and instruction. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

Molina, M., Rodríguez-Domingo, S., Cañadas, M. C., & Castro, E. (2017). Secondary school students’ errors in the translation of algebraic statements. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(6), 1137–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9739-5.

Nathan, M. J., Kintsch, W., & Young, E. (1992). A theory of algebra-word-problem comprehension and its implications for the design of learning environments. Cognition and Instruction, 9(4), 329–389. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0904_2.

McNeil, N. M., & Fyfe, E. R. (2012). “Concreteness fading” promotes transfer of mathematical knowledge. Leaning and Instruction, 22(6), 440–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaminstruc.2012.05.001.

Novick, L. (1988). Analogical transfer, problem similarity, and expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 510–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.510.

Pantziara, M., Gagatsis, A., & Elia, I. (2009). Using diagrams as tools for the solution of non-routine mathematical problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72, 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9181-5.

Pedersen, I. F. (2015). What characterizes the algebraic competence of Norwegian upper-secondary school students? Evidence from TIMSS Advanced. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9468-y.

Peräkylä, A. (2005). Analysing talk and text. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 869–886). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Rellensmann, J., Schukajlov, S., & Leopold, C. (2017). Make a drawing. Effects of strategic knowledge, drawing accuracy, and type of drawing on students’ mathematical modelling performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 95, 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9736-1.

Ross, B. H. (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(3), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.15.3.456.

Ruiz-Munzón, N., Bosch, M., & Gascón, J. (2013). Comparing approaches through a reference epistemological model: The case of school algebra. In B. Ubuz, Ç. Haser, & M. A. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Antalya, Turkey (pp. 2870–2879). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.

Schmidgalla, S., Eitel, A., & Scheiter, K. (2018). Why do learners who draw perform well? Investigating the role of visualization, generation and externalization in learner-generated drawing. Learning and Instruction, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.006.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando: Academic Press.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2007). Method. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 69–107). Charlotte: Information Age, for the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Schwartz, J. L. (1996). Semantic aspects of quantity. Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242313499_Semantic_Aspects_of_Quantity

Soneira, C., González-Calero, J. A., & Arnau, D. (2018). An assessment of the sources of the reversal error through classic and new variables. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9828-1.

Stake, R. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 446–466). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Stylianou, D. A. (2011). An examination of middle school students’ representation practices in mathematical problem solving through the lens of expert work: Towards an organizing scheme. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76, 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9273-2.

Stylianou, D. A., & Silver, E. A. (2004). The role of visual representations in advanced mathematical problem solving: An examination of expert-novice similarities and differences. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(4), 353–387. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0604_1.

Stacey, K., & MacGregror, M. (2000). Learning the algebraic method of solving problems. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 18(2), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S07323123(99)00026-7.

Uesaka, Y., & Manalo, E. (2012). Task-related factors that influence the spontaneous use of diagrams in math word problems. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1816.

Zahner, D., & Corter, J. E. (2010). The process of probability problem solving: Use of external visual representations. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), 177–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986061003654240.