The Role of Teleological Thinking in Learning the Darwinian Model of Evolution

Allen C, Bekoff M, Lauder G. Nature’s purposes. Analyses of function and design in biology. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1998.

Alters B, Nelson C. Perspective: teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution. 2002;56:1891–901.

Anderson D, Fisher K, Norman G. Developement and Evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. J Res Sci Teach. 2002;25(10):952–78.

Astolfi J. El trabajo didáctico de los obstáculos, en el corazón de los aprendizajes científicos. Enseñanza de las Ciencias. Revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas. 1994;12:206–16.

Astolfi J. Mots-Clés de la didactique des sciences, chapter 12. París: De Boeck & Larcier sa; 1997.

Astolfi J, Develay M. La didactique des sciences, chapter 2. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 1989. p. 2.

Atran S. Folk biology and the anthropology of science: cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behav Brain Sci. 1998;21:547–69.

Atran S. Folk biology. In: Wilson RA, Keil FC, editors. The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2001. p. 216–217.

Ayala F. Teleological explanations in evolutionary biology. Philos Sci. 1970;37:1–15.

Ayala F. The distinctness of biology. In: Weinert F, editor. Laws of nature: essays on the philosophical, scientific and historical dimensions. New York: Walter de Gruyter; 1995.

Ayala F. Teleological explanations versus teleology. Hist Philos Life Sci. 1998;20:41–50.

Ayala F. Adaptation and novelty: teleological explanations in evolutionary biology. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 1999;21:3–33.

Bachelard G. La formation de l’esprit scientifique. Paris: Vrin; 1938.

Bardapurkar A. Do students see the “Selection” in organic evolution? A critical review of the causal structure of student explanations. Evol Educ Outreach. 2008;1:299–305.

Bartov H. Can student be taught to distinguish between teleological and causal explanations? J Res Sci Teach. 1978;15:567–72.

Bartov H. Teaching students to understand the advantages and disadvantages of teleological and anthropomorphic statements in biology. J Res Sci Teach. 1982;18:79–86.

Bishop B, Anderson C. Students conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. J Res Sci Teach. 1990;27(5):415–27.

Brumby, M. Student’s preceptions and learning styles associated with the concept of evolution by natural selection. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Surrey, UK; 1979.

Brumby M. Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Sci Educ. 1980;68(4):493–503.

Caponi G. Darwin: entre Paley y Demócrito. História, Ciências, Saúde. Manguinhos. 2003;10:993–1023.

Dawkins R. Climbing mount improbable. Viking: Viking; 1996.

Dawkins R. Unweaving the rainbow. Science, delusion and the appetite for wonder, chapter 9. London: Penguin; 1998.

Dawkins R. The God delusion. New York: Houghton Mifflin; 2006.

Demastes S, Good R, Peebles P. Patterns of conceptual change in evolution. J Res Sci Teach. 1998;33(4):407–31.

Dennett D. The intentional stance, chapters 7 and 8. Cambridge: Bradford Books; 1987.

Dennett D. Darwin’s dangerous idea: evolution and the meanings of life, chapter 8. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1995.

Evans E. Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: creation vs evolution. Cogn Psychol. 2001;42:217–66.

Gené A. Cambio conceptual y metodológico en la enseñanza y el aprendizaje de la evolución de los seres vivos. Un ejemplo concreto. Enseñanza Cienc. 1991;9(1):22–7.

González Galli L, Revel Chion A, Meinardi E. Actividades centradas en obstáculos para enseñar el modelo de evolución por selección natural. Rev Educ Biol. 2008;11:52–5.

Hallden O. The evolution of species: pupil perspectivas and school perspectives. Int J Sci Educ. 1988;10:541–52.

Hull D, Ruse M, editors. The Cambridge companion to the philosophy of biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.

Inagaky K, Hatano G. Vitalistic causality in young children’s naive biology. Trends Cogn Sci. 2004;8:356–80.

Jungwirth E. The problem of teleology in biology as a problem of biology-teacher education. J Biol Educ. 1975;9(6):243–6.

Kampourakis K, Zogza V. Student’s preconceptions about evolution: how accurate is the characterization as “Lamarckian” when considering the history of evolutionary thought? Sci Educ. 2007;17:393–422.

Kattmann U. Learning biology by means of anthropomorphic conception? In: Hammann M, Reiss M, Boulter C, Dale Tunnicliffe S, editors. Biology in context. Learning and teaching for the twenty-first century. London: Institute of Education, University of London; 2008. Keil F. The birth and nurturance of concepts by domain: the origins. p. 7–17.

Keil F. The birth and nurturance of concepts by domain: the origins of concepts of living things. In: Hirschfeld L, Gelman S, editors. Mapping the mind. Domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. p. 234–254.

Kelemen D. Functions, goals and intentions: children’s teleological reasoning about objects. Trends Cogn Sci. 1999a;3:461–8.

Kelemen D. The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition. 1999b;70:241–72.

Kelemen D. Are children “intuitive theists”? Psychol Sci. 2004a;15:295–301.

Kelemen D. Counterintuition, existential anxiety, and religion as a by-product of the designing mind. Behav Brain Sci. 2004b;27:739–40.

Kelemen D, Rosset E. The human function compunction: teleological explanation in adults. Cognition. 2009;111:138–43.

Kirchner L. The Gaia hypothesis: fact, theory and wishful thinking. Clim Change. 2002;52:391–408.

Lennox J. Darwin was a teleologist. Biol Philos. 1993;8:409–21.

Lennox J. Teleology by another name: a replay to Ghiselin. Biol Philos. 1994;9:493–5.

Lennox J. Darwinism and Neodarwinism. In: Sarkar S, Plutynski A, editors. A companion to the philosophy of biology, chapter 5. Blackwell: Malden; 2008. p. 77–98.

Lennox J. Darwinism. In: Zalta E, editor. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Spring: Stanford; 2010. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/darwinism/.

Lewens T. Adaptationism and engineering. Biol Philos. 2002;17:1–31.

Lombrozo T, Carey S. Functional explanation and the function of explanation. Cognition. 2004;99:167–204.

Lucas A. The teaching of “adaptation”. J Biol Educ. 1971;5:86–90.

Martin, M. An examination of students misconceptions in genetics. In: Helm H, Novak JP, editors. International Seminar on Misconceptions in Science and Mathematics. Cornell; 1983. pp. 218–225.

Martinand J. Connaître et transformer la matière. Berna: Peter Lang; 1986.

Mayr E. This is biology. The science of the living world, chapter 4. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1997.

Mayr E. Toward a new philosophy of biology. Observations of an evolutionist, chapter 1. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1998.

National Academy of Sciences and Institute of Medicine. Science, Evolution, and Creationism. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 2008.

Opfer JE. Life, liveliness, and living kinds: how young children think about the biological world [Review of Young children’s naive thinking about the biological world]. Int J Behav Dev. 2003;27:375–80.

Rosenberg A, McShea D. Philosophy of biology. A contemporary introduction. New York: Routledge; 2008.

Ruse M. Philosophy of biology. London: Hutchinson; 1973.

Ruse M. Teleology: yesterday, today, and tomorrow? Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2000;31:213–32.

Ruse M. Charles Darwin (Blackwell great minds). Malden: Blackwell; 2008.

Ruse M. Charles Darwin, chapter 3. Oxford: Blackwell; 2007.

Settlage J. Conceptions of natural selection: a snapshot of the sense-making process. J Res Sci Teach. 1994;31(5):449–57.

Short T. Darwin’s concept of final cause: neither new nor trivial. Biol Philos. 2001;17:323–40.

Smith M. Counterpoint: belief, undestanding, and the teaching of evolution. J Res Sci Teach. 1994;31(5):591–7.

Sober E. Philosophy of biology, chapter 3. Oxford: Westview; 2000.

Talanquer V. Explanations and teleology in chemistry education. Int J Sci Educ. 2007;29:853–70.

Talanquer V. On cognitive constrains and learning progressions: the case of “structure of matter”. Int J Sci Educ. 2009;31:2123–36.

Ziegler D. The question of purpose. Evol Educ Outreach. 2008;1:44–5.

Zohar A, Ginossar S. Lifting the taboo regarding teleology and anthropomorphism in biology education—heretical suggestions. Sci Educ. 1998;82:679–97.

Zuzovsky R. Conceptualizing a teaching experience on the development of the idea of evolution: an epistemological approach to the education os science teachers. J Res Sci Teach. 1994;31(5):557–74.