The Role of Fairness in Modelling Customer Choice

Australasian Marketing Journal - Tập 19 - Trang 22-29 - 2011
Christine Mathies1, Siegfried P. Gudergan2
1University of New South Wales, School of Marketing, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
2University of Technology, Sydney, School of Marketing, City Campus Haymarket, Broadway, NSW 2003, Australia

Tóm tắt

Some business practices of service firms have the potential to negatively affect customer demand because they are perceived as unfair. We discuss how fairness concerns can influence customer choice, and propose a conceptualisation embedded in expected utility theory that accounts for fairness judgments. The intended contributions are (1) to advance the literature on customer decision making by combining expected utility theory with justice (fairness) theory; (2) to provide a conceptual framework capturing fairness in customer choice; and (3) to propose a research agenda concerning fairness in customer decision making.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Batra R., 1986, J. Cons. Res., 13, 234, 10.1086/209063 Ben-Akiva M., 1999, Mark. Lett., 10, 187, 10.1023/A:1008046730291 Biehal G., 1986, J. Cons. Res., 12, 382, 10.1086/208525 Bollen K., 1991, Psychol. Bull., 110, 305, 10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305 Bolton G.E., 2005, Econ. Theory, 25, 957, 10.1007/s00199-003-0459-z 10.1177/0092070300281009 Bolton L.E., 2003, J. Cons. Res., 29, 474, 10.1086/346244 Briesch R.A., 1997, J. Cons. Res., 24, 202, 10.1086/209505 Burton S., 1989, J. Consum. Mark., 6, 15, 10.1108/EUM0000000002543 Cherry B., 2003, J. Behav. Decis. Making, 16, 376, 10.1002/bdm.452 10.1177/0010880405281681 Cox J.L., 2001, J. Prod. Brand Manage., 10, 264 Diamantopoulos A., 1999, Int. Mark. Rev., 16, 444, 10.1108/02651339910300422 Erdem T., 2001, J. Mark. Res., 38, 10.1509/jmkr.38.4.445.18909 Erdem T., 2004, J. Cons. Res., 31, 10.1086/383434 Fitzsimons G.J., 2002, Mark. Lett., 13, 269, 10.1023/A:1020313710388 Frey B.S., 1993, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 20, 295, 10.1016/0167-2681(93)90027-M Hauser J.R., 1990, J. Cons. Res., 16, 393, 10.1086/209225 Helson H., 1948, Psychol. Rev., 55, 297, 10.1037/h0056721 Hempel D.J., 1993, Adv. Consum. Res., 20, 273 Hensher D.A. Johnson L.W. Applied Discrete-choice Modelling 1981 Wiley New York Hensher D.A. Rose J.M. Greene W.H. Applied Choice Analysis – A Primer 2005 Cambridge University Press Cambridge Herne K., 1998, J. Behav. Decis. Making, 11, 181, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199809)11:3<181::AID-BDM295>3.0.CO;2-T Holbrook M.B., 1982, J. Cons. Res., 9, 132, 10.1086/208906 Horowitz J.L., 1995, Int. J. Res. Mark., 12, 39, 10.1016/0167-8116(95)00004-L Hunt J.M., 1991, J. Soc. Psychol., 131, 685, 10.1080/00224545.1991.9924652 Huppertz J.W., 1978, J. Mark. Res., 15, 250, 10.1177/002224377801500208 Johnson E.J., 1985, Manag. Sci., 31, 395, 10.1287/mnsc.31.4.395 Kachelmeier S.J., 1991, Acc. Rev., 66, 694 Kahneman D., 1979, Econometrica, 47, 263, 10.2307/1914185 Kahneman D., 1986, J. Bus., 59, S285, 10.1086/296367 Kalyanaram G., 1995, Mark. Sci., 14, 161, 10.1287/mksc.14.3.G161 10.1177/001088049403500102 10.1177/0010880402431003 10.1177/1094670503257038 Konow J., 2003, J. Econ. Lit., 41, 1188, 10.1257/002205103771800013 Louviere J.J., 2001, J. Cons. Res., 28, 506, 10.1086/323739 Louviere J.J. Hensher D.A. Swait J.D. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application 2000 Cambridge University Press Cambridge Luce M.F., 1999, J. Mark. Res., 36, 143, 10.1177/002224379903600201 Maxwell S., 2002, J. Econ. Psych., 23, 191, 10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00063-6 10.1177/1094670502238918 McFadden D., 1986, Mark. Sci., 5, 275, 10.1287/mksc.5.4.275 McGill J., 1999, Transport. Sci., 33, 233, 10.1287/trsc.33.2.233 Mehta N., 2003, Mark. Sci., 22, 58, 10.1287/mksc.22.1.58.12849 Menzefricke U., 1979, Decision Sciences, 10, 195, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1979.tb00018.x 10.1177/002224377301000110 Munro A., 2003, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 50, 407, 10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00033-1 Oliver R.L., 1987, J. Econ. Psych., 8, 469, 10.1016/0167-4870(87)90037-7 Ordóñez L.D., 2000, J. Behav. Decis. Making, 13, 329, 10.1002/1099-0771(200007/09)13:3<329::AID-BDM356>3.0.CO;2-Q Patterson P.G., 2006, Int. J. Res. Mark., 23, 263, 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.02.004 Payne J.W., 1992, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 43, 87, 10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.000511 Puto C., 1987, J. Cons. Res., 14, 301, 10.1086/209115 Rajendran K.N., 1994, J. Mark., 58, 22, 10.1177/002224299405800102 Roberts J.H., 1991, J. Mark. Res., 28, 429, 10.1177/002224379102800405 Seiders K., 1998, Acad. Manage. Exec., 12, 8 Sugden R., 2003, J. Econ. Theory, 111, 172, 10.1016/S0022-0531(03)00082-6 Swait J., 2001, Transp. Res.: Part B: Methodological, 35, 903, 10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00030-8 Swait J., 1987, Transp. Res., 21, 91, 10.1016/0191-2615(87)90009-9 Talluri K., 2004, Manag. Sci., 50, 15, 10.1287/mnsc.1030.0147 Thaler R., 1980, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 1, 39, 10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7 Thaler R., 1985, Mark. Sci., 4, 199, 10.1287/mksc.4.3.199 Thurstone L., 1927, Psychol. Rev., 34, 273, 10.1037/h0070288 Tversky A., 1991, Quart. J. Econ., 106, 1039, 10.2307/2937956 Weiner B., 1985, Psychol. Rev., 92, 548, 10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548 10.1509/jmkg.68.4.1.42733