The Role of Abstract and Specific Knowledge in the Formation of Product Judgments: An Analogical Learning Perspective

Journal of Consumer Psychology - Tập 11 - Trang 141-158 - 2001
Jennifer Gregan-Paxton1
1Department of Business Administration, University of Delaware

Tóm tắt

Prior research has assumed that existing knowledge exerts its influence on consumer judgments primarily through abstract knowledge structures. Consequently, little attention has been given to the possibility that judgments may, under certain circumstances, be influenced by knowledge associated with more specific knowledge structures. This article examines the factors responsible for determining the impact of abstract versus specific knowledge on consumer judgments. Based on the Consumer Learning by Analogy model (CLA model; Gregan‐Paxton & John, 1997), it is argued that the relative influence of abstract and specific knowledge is a function of (a) the relation between the new product and existing knowledge and (b) the nature of consumer's knowledge. These ideas were tested in a series of experiments in which participants were required to judge a new product that varied in its relation to an existing product or brand. In this context, the influence of specific knowledge was most evident when participants were able to construct an attribute mapping, but not a relational mapping, to link the novel product to a familiar brand exemplar. When it was possible to construct a relational mapping, a more abstract knowledge structure, such as a schema, was retrieved and used as the basis of product judgments.

Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1037/0033-2909.93.2.203 10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.932 10.1086/209424 Beike D.R., 1994, Handbook of social cognition, 209 10.2307/3172723 10.1177/002224379403100206 10.1086/209406 Carey S., 1985, Conceptual change in childhood Cauzinille‐Marméche E., 1998, Advances in analogy research: Integration of theory and data from the cognitive computational, and neural sciences, 231 10.1207/s15516709cog1501_3 10.1037/0278-7393.7.6.397 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60317-2 10.1017/CBO9780511529863.011 10.1016/0010-0285(91)90010-L 10.1086/209335 10.1086/209509 10.1086/209194 10.1037/0278-7393.7.6.418 10.1037/0022-3514.63.5.739 10.1086/208537 10.1006/jmla.1993.1027 10.3758/BF03200884 10.1016/0010-0285(81)90012-8 10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.254 Medin D., 1988, Advances in the psychology of human intelligence, 189 10.1086/209192 10.1037/0278-7393.10.1.144 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90007-7 10.1086/209476 10.1086/209300 10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.323 10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.14 10.1016/0022-1031(87)90031-X 10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.381 Roehm M. Sternthal B. (1999).Analogy mood and judgment. Working paper. 10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.629 10.1037/0278-7393.8.5.484 10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.3 10.1086/209299 10.1086/209033 10.2307/3152161 Zhang S. & Markman A. (in press). Processing product unique features: Alignability and involvement in preference construction.Journal of Consumer Psychology 11 13–27.
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Journal of Consumer Psychology

Tập 11

141-158

Thông tin tác giả