The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations

Administrative Science Quarterly - Tập 55 Số 4 - Trang 543-676 - 2010
Emilio J. Castilla1, Stephen Benard2
1Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
2Indiana University,

Tóm tắt

In this article, we develop and empirically test the theoretical argument that when an organizational culture promotes meritocracy (compared with when it does not), managers in that organization may ironically show greater bias in favor of men over equally performing women in translating employee performance evaluations into rewards and other key career outcomes; we call this the “paradox of meritocracy.” To assess this effect, we conducted three experiments with a total of 445 participants with managerial experience who were asked to make bonus, promotion, and termination recommendations for several employee profiles. We manipulated both the gender of the employees being evaluated and whether the company's core values emphasized meritocracy in evaluations and compensation. The main finding is consistent across the three studies: when an organization is explicitly presented as meritocratic, individuals in managerial positions favor a male employee over an equally qualified female employee by awarding him a larger monetary reward. This finding demonstrates that the pursuit of meritocracy at the workplace may be more difficult than it first appears and that there may be unrecognized risks behind certain organizational efforts used to reward merit. We discuss possible underlying mechanisms leading to the paradox of meritocracy effect as well as the scope conditions under which we expect the effect to occur.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Acker J., 1989, Doing Comparable Worth: Gender, Class and Pay Equity

10.1177/089124390004002002

10.1515/9780691190334

10.2307/2392249

Barley S. R., 1991, Reframing Organizational Culture, 39

10.1146/annurev.so.10.080184.000345

10.2307/2094893

10.1086/229690

10.1177/000312240507000407

10.1086/228350

10.1037/0003-066X.58.12.1019

10.1111/0022-4537.00237

10.1177/014920639201800206

Burke E., 2005, “2005 reward programs and incentive compensation: Survey report. A study by the society for human resource management.”

10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199822)37:2<131::AID-HRM4>3.0.CO;2-X

Cappelli P., 1999, The New Deal at Work

10.1093/oso/9780195103274.001.0001

10.1086/588738

Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2

Correll S. J., 2003, Handbook of Social Psychology, 29

10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414

10.1037/h0035733

Dench G., 2006, The Rise and Rise of Meritocracy

10.2189/asqu.2009.54.3.453

10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5

10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.263

10.1515/9781400830893

Dobbin F., Schrage D., Kalev A. 2008 “Someone to watch over me: Coupling, decoupling, and unintended consequences in corporate equal opportunity.” Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Meeting, Boston.

10.1086/230269

Duguid M. M., 2010, Organization Science, 1

10.1037/0033-295X.109.3.573

10.1086/229459

10.1086/229939

Edelman L. B., 1999, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 17, 107

10.1086/210316

10.1177/109442810143005

Edwards R. C., 1979, Contested Terrain

10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.001

10.2307/2667087

10.1287/orsc.13.6.601.499

Fein S., 2003, Motivated Social Perception: The Ontario Symposium, 21

Ferguson K. E., 1984, The Feminist Case against Bureaucracy

10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.21

10.1037/0022-3514.35.10.691

Gaertner S. L., 2005, Handbook of Employment Discrimination Research, 377

10.4135/9781452229256

10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4

10.2307/20439056

Hale J., 2004, Performance-based Management: What Every Manager Should Do to Get Results

10.1037/0021-9010.77.4.536

10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.346

Heneman R. L., 2005, Merit Pay: Linking Pay to Performance in a Changing World, 2

Hewitt Associates, 2002, U.S. Salary Increase Survey Report for 2002

Institute of Management and Administration (IOMA), 2000, IOMA's Report on Salary Surveys

Jacoby S. M. 1985 Employing Bureaucracy: Managers, Unions, and the Transformation of Work in American Industry, 1900–1945. New York: Columbia University Press.

10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.006

10.1086/597175

10.1177/000312240607100404

Kanter R. M., 1977, Men and Women of the Corporation

10.1177/0002764298041007008

10.1086/210317

Kluegel J. R., 1986, Beliefs about Inequality: American's Views of What Is and What Ought to Be

Kochan T. A., 1986, The Transformation of American Industrial Relations

10.5465/amr.1992.4279534

10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.522

Ladd E. C., 1994, The American Ideology

Ladd E. C., 1998, Attitudes toward Economic Inequality

10.4159/9780674054158

Lawler E. E., 2003, WorldatWork Journal (second quarter), 49

Lazear E., 1998, Personnel Economics for Managers

10.1257/aer.90.5.1346

10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255

10.1016/S1534-0856(06)08011-X

10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02158.x

Martin J., 1992, Culture in Organizations, 10.1093/oso/9780195071634.001.0001

Martocchio J. J., 2004, Strategic Compensation: A Human Resource Management Approach, 4

Mathis R. L., 2003, Human Resource Management, 10

McNamee S. J., 2004, The Meritocracy Myth

10.1086/226550

Milkovich G. T., 2004, Compensation, 8

Miller S., 2006, Society for Human Resource Management Online's Compensation and Benefits Focus Area

10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.33

10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.167

Noe R. A., 2008, Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage

10.7591/9781501735172

10.1515/9781400823130

Osterman P., 2001, Working in America: A Blueprint for the New Labor Market

10.1016/0749-5978(86)90006-3

10.1086/378536

10.1006/jesp.1993.1007

10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.440

10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.811

10.1287/mnsc.1050.0389

10.2307/2654387

10.1177/000312240006500204

10.2307/2657301

Roth L. M., 2006, Selling Women Short: Gender and Money on Wall Street

10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070254

Scharinger D. 2002 “Performance appraisal: An overview”. Society for Human Resource Management's Information Center. Retrieved June 24, 2008. http://www.shrm.org/hrresources/whitepapers_published/CMS_000105.asp.

Scully M. A., 1997, Black-well Encyclopedic Dictionary of Business Ethics, 413

Scully M. A., 2000, Relational Wealth: The Advantages of Stability in a Changing Economy, 199

10.1023/A:1018839203698

Stinchcombe A. L., 2001, When Formality Works: Authority and Abstraction in Law and Organizations

10.1086/230368

10.2307/2095521

10.2307/3033716

10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.74

10.1177/0003122410388491

Uhlmann E. L., 2005, Psychological Science, 16, 474, 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01559.x

10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.07.001

10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.36

Young M., 1994, The Rise of the Meritocracy

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Administrative Science Quarterly

Tập 55 Số 4

543-676

Thông tin tác giả