The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations
Tóm tắt
In this article, we develop and empirically test the theoretical argument that when an organizational culture promotes meritocracy (compared with when it does not), managers in that organization may ironically show greater bias in favor of men over equally performing women in translating employee performance evaluations into rewards and other key career outcomes; we call this the “paradox of meritocracy.” To assess this effect, we conducted three experiments with a total of 445 participants with managerial experience who were asked to make bonus, promotion, and termination recommendations for several employee profiles. We manipulated both the gender of the employees being evaluated and whether the company's core values emphasized meritocracy in evaluations and compensation. The main finding is consistent across the three studies: when an organization is explicitly presented as meritocratic, individuals in managerial positions favor a male employee over an equally qualified female employee by awarding him a larger monetary reward. This finding demonstrates that the pursuit of meritocracy at the workplace may be more difficult than it first appears and that there may be unrecognized risks behind certain organizational efforts used to reward merit. We discuss possible underlying mechanisms leading to the paradox of meritocracy effect as well as the scope conditions under which we expect the effect to occur.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Acker J., 1989, Doing Comparable Worth: Gender, Class and Pay Equity
Barley S. R., 1991, Reframing Organizational Culture, 39
Burke E., 2005, “2005 reward programs and incentive compensation: Survey report. A study by the society for human resource management.”
Cappelli P., 1999, The New Deal at Work
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2
Correll S. J., 2003, Handbook of Social Psychology, 29
Dench G., 2006, The Rise and Rise of Meritocracy
Dobbin F., Schrage D., Kalev A. 2008 “Someone to watch over me: Coupling, decoupling, and unintended consequences in corporate equal opportunity.” Paper presented at the American Sociological Association Meeting, Boston.
Duguid M. M., 2010, Organization Science, 1
Edelman L. B., 1999, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 17, 107
Edwards R. C., 1979, Contested Terrain
Fein S., 2003, Motivated Social Perception: The Ontario Symposium, 21
Ferguson K. E., 1984, The Feminist Case against Bureaucracy
Gaertner S. L., 2005, Handbook of Employment Discrimination Research, 377
Hale J., 2004, Performance-based Management: What Every Manager Should Do to Get Results
Heneman R. L., 2005, Merit Pay: Linking Pay to Performance in a Changing World, 2
Hewitt Associates, 2002, U.S. Salary Increase Survey Report for 2002
Institute of Management and Administration (IOMA), 2000, IOMA's Report on Salary Surveys
Jacoby S. M. 1985 Employing Bureaucracy: Managers, Unions, and the Transformation of Work in American Industry, 1900–1945. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kanter R. M., 1977, Men and Women of the Corporation
Kluegel J. R., 1986, Beliefs about Inequality: American's Views of What Is and What Ought to Be
Kochan T. A., 1986, The Transformation of American Industrial Relations
Ladd E. C., 1994, The American Ideology
Ladd E. C., 1998, Attitudes toward Economic Inequality
Lawler E. E., 2003, WorldatWork Journal (second quarter), 49
Lazear E., 1998, Personnel Economics for Managers
Martocchio J. J., 2004, Strategic Compensation: A Human Resource Management Approach, 4
Mathis R. L., 2003, Human Resource Management, 10
McNamee S. J., 2004, The Meritocracy Myth
Milkovich G. T., 2004, Compensation, 8
Miller S., 2006, Society for Human Resource Management Online's Compensation and Benefits Focus Area
Noe R. A., 2008, Human Resource Management: Gaining a Competitive Advantage
Osterman P., 2001, Working in America: A Blueprint for the New Labor Market
Roth L. M., 2006, Selling Women Short: Gender and Money on Wall Street
Scharinger D. 2002 “Performance appraisal: An overview”. Society for Human Resource Management's Information Center. Retrieved June 24, 2008. http://www.shrm.org/hrresources/whitepapers_published/CMS_000105.asp.
Scully M. A., 1997, Black-well Encyclopedic Dictionary of Business Ethics, 413
Scully M. A., 2000, Relational Wealth: The Advantages of Stability in a Changing Economy, 199
Stinchcombe A. L., 2001, When Formality Works: Authority and Abstraction in Law and Organizations
Young M., 1994, The Rise of the Meritocracy