The Meaning, Antecedents and Outcomes of Employee Engagement: A Narrative Synthesis

International Journal of Management Reviews - Tập 19 Số 1 - Trang 31-53 - 2017
Catherine Bailey1, Adrian Madden2, Kerstin Alfes3, Luke Fletcher4
1Department of Business and Management, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9RH, UK
2Faculty of Business Department of Human Resources and Organisational Behaviour, University of Greenwich Greenwich SE10 9LS
3Department of Human Resource Studies Tilburg University Warandelaan 2 5037 Tilburg The Netherlands
4Brighton Business School, University of Brighton, Brighton BN2 4AT, UK

Tóm tắt

The claim that high levels of engagement can enhance organizational performance and individual well‐being has not previously been tested through a systematic review of the evidence. To bring coherence to the diffuse body of literature on engagement, the authors conducted a systematic synthesis of narrative evidence involving 214 studies focused on the meaning, antecedents and outcomes of engagement. The authors identified six distinct conceptualizations of engagement, with the field dominated by the Utrecht Group's ‘work engagement’ construct and measure, and by the theorization of engagement within the ‘job demands–resources’ framework. Five groups of factors served as antecedents to engagement: psychological states; job design; leadership; organizational and team factors; and organizational interventions. Engagement was found to be positively associated with individual morale, task performance, extra‐role performance and organizational performance, and the evidence was most robust in relation to task performance. However, there was an over‐reliance on quantitative, cross‐sectional and self‐report studies within the field, which limited claims of causality. To address controversies over the commonly used measures and concepts in the field and gaps in the evidence‐base, the authors set out an agenda for future research that integrates emerging critical sociological perspectives on engagement with the psychological perspectives that currently dominate the field.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Agarwal U.A., 2013, Effects of psychological contract breach on organizational outcomes: moderating role of tenure and educational levels, Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 38, 13, 10.1177/0256090920130102

10.1108/13620431211241063

10.1007/s00420-012-0732-1

10.1080/09585192.2012.679950

10.1002/hrm.21512

10.1108/09604521211253469

10.1080/14768320600941814

10.1080/09585192.2013.763842

10.1080/14623730.2012.682754

10.1080/09585192.2012.751438

10.1016/j.jvb.2011.08.008

10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.274

10.1177/0730888406291310

10.1111/joop.12082

10.1111/joms.12028

10.1080/13594321003669061

10.1108/GM-01-2013-0005

10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05859.x

10.1108/JSM-01-2012-0021

10.5465/amj.2013.0227

10.1111/jonm.12182

10.1177/0256090920130103

10.1037/a0024532

10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3

10.1111/joop.12041

10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763986.013.0007

10.1177/0146167205276525

10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00096.x

Brummelhuis L.L.T., 2012, Do new ways of working foster work engagement, Psicothema, 24, 113

Buys C., 2010, Burnout and engagement of reformed church ministers, SAJIP: South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36, 1

10.4337/9781849806374.00045

10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00745.x

10.1111/j.1744-7941.2012.00030.x

10.1111/j.1744-6570.2010.01203.x

10.1108/09513540910990816

10.1108/13620431111187290

10.1017/S183336720000287X

10.1177/0149206311415252

10.1002/hrm.21691

10.1027/1866-5888/a000102

Crawford E.A., 2014, Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice, 57

10.1037/a0019364

10.2466/01.03.10.PR0.111.5.528-544

De Braine R., 2011, The job demands–resources model as predictor of work identity and work engagement: a comparative analysis, SAJIP: South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37, 52

10.5209/rev_SJOP.2012.v15.n2.38883

10.1007/s10551-012-1296-4

Denyer D, 2009, The Sage Handbook of Organizational Research Methods, 671

10.1111/j.1468-2389.2012.00583.x

10.5465/amr.2006.20208680

10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218

10.1108/JHOM-10-2012-0192

10.1002/smi.2502

10.1111/1748-8583.12030

Goliath‐Yarde L., 2011, Differential item functioning of the UWES‐17 in South Africa, SAJIP: South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37, 240

10.2307/1130293

Goffman E., 1959, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life

Guest D., 2014, Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice, 221

10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7

10.1080/02678370802379432

10.1037/a0021320

10.1027/1016-9040.11.2.119

10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268

10.1007/s10551‐013‐1774‐3

10.1016/j.jvb.2006.03.002

10.1108/13620430910997277

10.1080/02619768.2011.633993

10.1108/13620431111107784

10.1037/a0024849

10.1007/s00420-012-0777-1

10.1080/09585192.2013.770780

10.1111/ijmr.12038

10.2307/256287

10.1177/0018726713495068

Karatepe O.M., 2012, Job resources, work engagement, and hotel employee outcomes: a time‐lagged analysis, Economic Research, 25, 1127

Keenoy T., 2014, Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice, 197

10.1002/job.699

10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.01.004

10.1016/j.ijhm.2012.01.002

10.1136/bmj.b2700

10.1111/j.1754-9434.2007.0002.x

10.1007/s00423-012-1044-3

10.1348/096317904322915892

10.4102/sajip.v37i1.900

10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.01.007

Meyer J.P., 1997, Commitment in the Workplace. Theory, Research and Application, 10.4135/9781452231556

10.1111/ijmr.12009

10.1108/13620431211280123

10.1080/1359432X.2010.532869

Patterson M., 2007, Review of the Validity and Reliability of Measures of Human Resource Management

10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.438

10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Popay J., 2006, Guidance on the Conduct of Narrative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews. A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme

10.1111/1748-8583.12046

10.1080/09585192.2013.876440

10.1080/09585192.2013.763843

10.1177/1523422311430784

10.1080/09585192.2013.765497

10.5465/amj.2010.51468988

10.1016/j.colegn.2012.07.001

10.2307/256693

10.1108/02683940610690169

10.1080/09585190701763982

10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1217

10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00284.x

10.1108/01437721211225426

Schaufeli W.B., 2014, Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice, 15

10.1080/1359432X.2010.515981

10.1023/A:1015630930326

10.1080/15427600902911247

10.1080/1360080X.2013.748477

10.1007/s10902-008-9100-y

10.1111/j.1442-2018.2011.00636.x

10.2486/indhealth.MS1355

10.1016/S1479-3555(03)03004-X

10.1177/1534484311410840

10.1080/13678868.2012.726542

10.1080/02678370802379440

10.1037/a0028292

10.4337/9781849806374.00035

10.1080/00223980.2012.665100

Sulea C., 2012, Conscientious, therefore engaged in work? Don't take it for granted: the moderating role of workplace mistreatment, Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 10, 23

10.1016/j.jvb.2011.04.012

10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.011

10.1080/09585192.2012.743478

Truss C., 2014, Employee Engagement in Theory and Practice

10.1080/09585192.2013.798921

10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04341.x

Van Schalkwyk S., 2010, Job insecurity, leadership empowerment behavior, employee engagement and intention to leave in a petrochemical laboratory, South African Journal of Human Resource Management, 8, 1

Vera M., 2010, University faculty and work‐related well‐being: the importance of the triple work profile, Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8, 581

Viera A.J., 2005, Understanding Interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic, Family Medicine Research Series, 37, 360

10.1080/09585192.2011.639542

10.2224/sbp.2013.41.4.613

10.1002/job.560

10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011.01059.x

Wang H‐J., 2014, Job insecurity and job performance: the moderating role of organizational justice and the mediating role of work engagement, Journal of Applied Psychology

10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01113.x

10.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.003

10.1080/09585192.2013.763844

10.1016/j.jairtraman.2012.08.011

10.1177/1059601108331242