The Maker Movement: a Global Movement for Educational Change

Bannister, N. A. (2015). Reframing practice: Teacher learning through interactions in a collaborative group. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(3), 347–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.999196. Barton, A. C., Tan, E. & Greenberg, D. (2016). The makerspace movement: Sites of possibilities for equitable opportunities to engage underrepresented youth in STEM. Teachers College Record. Advance online publication. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 611–639. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611. Borrego, M., & Henderson, C. (2014). Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 220–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20040. Bowler, L. (2014). Creativity through “maker” experiences and design thinking in the education of librarians. Knowledge Quest, 42(5), 58–61. Bowler, L., & Champagne, R. (2016). Mindful makers: Question prompts to help guide young peoples’ critical technical practices in maker spaces in libraries, museums, and community-based youth organizations. Library & Information Science Research, 38(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.04.006. Boylan, M., & Povey, H. (2009). Telling stories about mathematics. In L. Black, H. Mendick, & Y. Solomon (Eds.), Mathematical relationships in education: Identities and participation (pp. 47–57). New York, NY: Routledge. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association. Carr, R. L., Bennett, L. D., & Strobel, J. (2012). Engineering in the K-12 STEM standards of the 50 US states: An analysis of presence and extent. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(3), 539–564. Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00499.x. Diani, M. (1992). The concept of social movement. The Sociological Review, 40(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1992.tb02943.x. Dougherty, D. (2012). The maker movement. Innovations, 7(3), 11–14. Dougherty, D. (2013). The maker mindset. In M. Honey & D. E. Kanter (Eds.), Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of science innovators (pp. 7–11). New York, NY: Routledge. Drezner, D. W. (2001). Globalization and policy convergence. International Studies Review, 3(1), 53–78. Edwards, B., & McCarthy, J. D. (2004). Resources and social movement mobilization. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 116–152). Malden, MA: Blackwell. Erdmann, L. & Dönitz, E. (2016). Zukunftsbilder für Offene Werkstätten [Future pictures for open workshops]. Paper presented at the First Conference of Interdisziplinäre Konferenz zur Zukunft der Wertschöpfung Hamburg [Interdisciplinary Conference on the Future of Value Creation Hamburg], Hamburg, Germany. Erol, S., Schumacher, A. & Sihn, W. (2016). Industrie 4.0 – Chancen und Risiken einer angekündigten Revolution [Industry 4.0—Chances and risks of an announced revolution]. In Industriebuch 2016 des Industriewissenschaftlichen Instituts [Industry Book of the Industrial Science Institute]. Germany. European Commission (2016). First-ever EU institutional maker faire. Retrieved on May 31, 2016 from https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/first-ever-eu-institutional-maker-faire. Fallows, J. (2016). Why the maker movement matters: Part 1, the tools revolution. The Atlantic. Retrieved on August 23, 2017 from https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2016/06/why-the-maker-movement-matters-part-1-the-tools-revolution/485720/. Fastermann, P. (2014). 3D-Drucken: Wie die generative Fertigungstechnik funktioniert [How does the generative manufacturing technology work]. Berlin, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. New York, NY: Cambridge Univ. Press. General Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China (2015). Guiding opinions on the development of makerspaces to promote popular innovation and startup. China science and technology Newsletter. Retrieved on May 10, 2017 from http://www.chinaembassy.org.nz/chn/zxgxs/kjhz/P020151123361006938250.pdf. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Griffith, A. L. (2010). Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters? Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 911–922. Halverson, E. R. (2013). Digital art making as a representational process. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(1), 121–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.639471. Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. M. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495–504. Hatch, M. (2014). The maker movement manifesto. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Hathcock, S. J., Dickerson, D. L., Eckhoff, A., & Katsioloudis, P. (2015). Scaffolding for creative product possibilities in design-based STEM activity. Research in Science Education, 45(5), 727–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9437-7. Howard, C., Gerosa, A., Mejuto, M. C., & Giannella, G. (2014). The maker movement: A new avenue for competition in the EU. European View, 13(2), 333–340. Jensen, F., & Sjaastad, J. (2013). A Norwegian out-of-school mathematics project’s influence on secondary students’ STEM motivation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(6), 1437–1461. Kelly, G. J., Chen, C., & Crawford, T. (1998). Methodological considerations for studying science-in-the-making in educational settings. Research in Science Education, 28(1), 23–49. Lacey, T. A., & Wright, B. (2009). Employment outlook: 2008-18-occupational employment projections to 2018. Monthly Labor Review, 132, 82–123. Lindtner, S. (2017). Ex oriente make: The future of maker culture is made in China. re:publica. Retrieved on May 10, 2017 from https://re-publica.com/en/17/session/ex-oriente-make-future-maker-culture-made-china. Magistad, M. K. (2016). The maker movement that was born in the USA has taken on Chinese characteristics. Public Radio International. Retrieved on May 10, 2017 from https://www.pri.org/stories/2016-08-11/maker-movement-was-born-usa-has-taken-chinese-characteristics. Malinin, L. H., Williams, A. & Leigh, K. (2016). The psycho-spatial dynamics of workplace designs for creative disruption. In R. DeFillippi, A. Rieple & P. Wikström (Eds.), International perspectives on business innovation and disruption in design (pp. 204–230). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar. Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1099. Muro, M. & Hirshberg, P. (2017). Five ways the maker movement can help catalyze a manufacturing renaissance. Brookings. Retrieved on August 23, 2017 from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2017/01/04/the-maker-movement-can-catalyze-a-manufacturing-renaissance/. Neidhardt, F., & Rucht, D. (1991). The analysis of social movements: The state of the art and some perspectives for further research. In D. Rucht (Ed.), Research on social movements (pp. 421–464). Boulder, CO: Westview. Norris, A. (2014). Make-her-spaces as hybrid places: Designing and resisting self constructions in urban classrooms. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2014.866879. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc.. Peppler, K., & Bender, S. (2013). Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(3), 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171309500306. Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Porta, D. D., & Diani, M. (2009). Social movements: An introduction (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell. Ramsauer, C. & Friessnig, M. (2016). Einfluss der Maker Movement auf die Forschung und Entwicklung [Influence of maker movement on the research and education]. In H. Biedermann (Ed.), Industrial Engineering und Management: Beiträge des Techno-Ökonomie-Forums der TU Austria [Industrial engineering and management: Contributions of the Techno-Economics-Forum of the Technology University Austria] (pp. 43–61). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer. Sahin, A., Ayar, M. C., & Adiguzel, T. (2014). STEM related after-school program activities and associated outcomes on student learning. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 309–322. Saldaña, J. (2014). Thinking qualitatively: Methods of mind. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications. Schön, S., Ebner, M., & Kumar, S. (2014). The maker movement. Implications of new digital gadgets, fabrication tools and spaces for creative learning and teaching. eLearning Papers, 39, 14–25. Shanghai China (2012). The development plan of science and technology in Shanghai during the 12th five-year plan. Online Government Hall. Retrieved on May 10, 2017 from http://www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw2/nw2314/nw2319/nw22396/nw22403/u21aw612829.html. Shanghai City Hall (2016). Notice of the general office of the municipal government on printing and distributing the 13th five-year plan of Shanghai science and technology cause. Retrieved on May 10, 2017 from http://www.shanghai.gov.cn/nw2/nw2314/nw39309/nw39385/nw40603/u26aw51088.html. Sheridan, K., Halverson, E. R., Litts, B., Brahms, L., Jacobs-Priebe, L., & Owens, T. (2014). Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 505–531. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1), 197–217. Sohn, G. (2013). Makers-Bewegung revolutioniert die Industrie [Maker movement is revolutionizing the industry]. The European. Retrieved on August 23, 2017 from http://www.theeuropean.de/gunnar-sohn/6711-makers-bewegung-revolutioniert-die-industrie. Startup Europe (2016). Europe is the maker continent and the EUmaker week confirms that fact. Madrid Startup House. Retrieved on August 23, 2017 from http://madridstartuphouse.com/europe-is-the-maker-continent-and-the-eumakerweek-confirms-that-fact/. Tanenbaum, J. G., Williams, A. M., Desjardins, A. & Tanenbaum, K. (2013). Democratizing technology: Pleasure, utility and expressiveness in DIY and maker practice. In W. E. Mackay, S. Brewster, & S. Bødker (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2603–2612). Zurich, Switzerland: Association of Computing Machinery. The White House (2016). Fact sheet: New commitments in support of the president’s nation of makers initiative to kick off 2016 national week of making. The White House Briefing Room. Retrieved on September 28, 2017 from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/06/17/fact-sheet-new-commitments-support-presidents-nation-makers-initiative. Turner, R. H., & Killian, L. M. (1987). Collective behavior (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Ültanir, E. (2012). An epistemologic glance at the constructivist approach: Constructivist learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 195–212. Voight, J. (2015). Which big brands are courting the maker movement, and why. AdWeek. Retrieved on September 3, 2017 from http://www.adweek.com/brand-marketing/which-big-brands-are-courting-maker-movement-and-why-156315/. Vossoughi, S., Hooper, H., & Escudé, M. (2016). Making through the lens of culture and power: Toward transformative visions for educational equity. Harvard Educational Review, 86(2), 206–232. Wang, X. (2013). Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(2), 1081–1121. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213488622. Weiss, C. (1995). The four “I’s” of school reform: How interests, ideology, information, and institution affect teachers and principals. Harvard Educational Review, 65(4), 571–593.