The Genders of Citizenship

American Political Science Review - Tập 101 Số 1 - Trang 33-46 - 2007
Stephen T. Leonard1, Joan C. Tronto2
1University of North Carolina
2City University of New York

Tóm tắt

One important legacy of republicanism is the ideal of good citizenship; a related legacy of republicanism is the equation of citizenship and masculinity. These legacies are at once strange and familiar: today, masculinity and citizenship are often conceptualized as discrete and distinctive identities, and some critics, most notably feminists, suggest that in modern democraciesgoodcitizenship and masculinity may even be contradictory ideals. The source of these conceptual paradoxes is the transformation of gender and civic discourse in the early modern period, particularly the “long eighteenth century.” Understanding the implications of these changes helps us better grasp both the relationship of gender and citizenship today, and how a more effectively engaged and meaningfully egalitarian form of democratic citizenship, for men and women, might be realized.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Wilson Kathleen .2003.The island race: Englishness, empire and gender in the eighteenth century.New York:Routledge.

Spitz Jean Fabien .2002.“From Civism to Civility: D'Holbach's Critique of Republican Virtue.”In Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage,ed. M. S. Van Gelderen and Q. Skinner .Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Hazeland William .2003.“A View of the Manner in Which Trade and Civil Liberty Support Each Other.”In Commerce, Culture, and Liberty: Readings on Capitalism Before Adam Smith,ed. Henry C. Clark .Indianapolis:Liberty Fund.Originally published 1756.

Fielding Henry .2003.“An Enquiry into the Causes of the Late Increase of Robbers.”In Commerce, Culture, and Liberty: Readings on Capitalism Before Adam Smith,ed. Henry C. Clark .Indianapolis:Liberty Fund.Originally published 1757.

Vega Judith A. 2002.“Feminist Republicanism and the Political Perception of Gender.”In Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage,ed. M. S. Van Leeuwen and Q. Skinner .Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Brown John .2003.“An Estimate of the Manners and Principles of the Times.”In Commerce, Culture, and Liberty: Readings on Capitalism Before Adam Smith,ed. Henry C. Clark .Indianapolis:Liberty Fund.Originally published 1757.

Landes Joan B .1988.Women and the Public Sphere in the Age of the French Revolution.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.

Snyder R. Claire .1999.Citizen-Soldiers and Manly Warriors: Military Service and Gender in the Civic Republican Tradition.Lanham, MD:Rowman and Littlefield.

Ferguson Adam .1995.An Essay on the History of Civil Society,ed. Fania Oz-Salzbereger .Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Originally published 1767.

Sennett Richard .1998.The Fall of Public Man: On the Social Psychology of Capitalism.New York:Vintage Books.

Fletcher Anthony .1995.Gender, Sex and Subordination in England, 1500–1800.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.

Wingrove Elizabeth .2005.“Getting Intimate with Wollstonecraft in the Republic of Letters.”Political Theory 33 (3):344–69.

Smith Adam .1976.An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations.ed. R. H. Campbell and A. S. Skinner ,2 vols,Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith.Indianapolis:Liberty Press.Originally published 1776.

Smith Adam .1982.The Theory of Moral Sentiments.Indianapolis:Liberty Fund. Originally published 1759.

Tocqueville Alexis de .1961.Democracy in America.New York:Schocken. Originally published 1835.

Kerber Linda .1980.Women of the Republic: Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary America.Chapel Hill, NC:University of North Carolina Press

Shuffleton Frank. ed .2004.The Letters of John and Abigail Adams.New York:Penguin.

Gelles Edith B .2002.Abigail Adams: A Writing Life.New York:Routledge.

Johnson Claudia L .1995.Equivocal Beings: Politics, Gender and Sentimentality in the 1790s: Wollstonecraft, Radcliffe, Burney, Austen.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Barker-Benfield G. J. 1992.The culture of sensibility: Sex and society in eighteenth-century Britain,ed. G. J. Barker-Benfield .Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Foyster Elizabeth .2001.“Boys Will Be Boys? Manhood and Aggression, 1660–1800.”In English Masculinities 1660–1800,ed. Tim Hitchcock and Michele Cohen .New York:Longman.

Carter Philip .2001.Men and the Emergence of Polite Society, Britain 1600–1800.Harlow, England:Longman.

Ellison Julie K .1999.Cato's tears and the making of Anglo-American emotion.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Constant Benjamin .1988.“The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with that of the Moderns.”In Benjamin Constant: Political Writings,ed. B. Fontana .Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Originally published 1819.

Bederman Gail .1995.Manliness and Civilization: A Culture History of Gender and Race in the United States, 1880–1917.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Okin Susan Moller .1982.“Women and the making of the Sentimental Family.”Philosophy and Public Affairs 11 (1):65–88.

Roper Michael , and John Tosh , eds.1991.Manful Assertions: Masculinities in Britain Since 1800.London:Routledge.

Putnam Robert .1996.“The Strange Disappearance of Civic America.”The American Prospect (December 1):7–24.

Gelderen Martin van , and Quentin Skinner .2005.Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Moglen Helene .2001.The trauma of gender: A feminist theory of the English novel.Berkeley:University of California Press.

Hitchcock Tim , and Michèle Cohen . eds.1999.English masculinities, 1660–1800.New York:Longman.

Fauré Christine .2002.“Rights or Virtues: Women and the Republic.”In Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage,ed. M. S. Van Gelderen and Q. Skinner .Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Harris Barbara .1998.Gender, Sex and Subordination in England: 1500–1800—Book Reviews.Journal of Social History 32,3 (Spring).Available at http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2005/is_n3_v31/ai_20574155.

Hirschman Albert O .1981.The Passions and the Interests Political Arguments for Capitalism Before Its Triumph.Princeton:Princeton University Press.

Göbel Walter , Saskia Schabio , and Martin Windisch , eds.2001.Engendering images of man in the long eighteenth century.Trier:WVT Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.

Faludi Susan .1999.Stiffed: The Betrayal of the American Man.New York:Harper Collins.

Kay Carol .1986.“Canon, Ideology and Gender: Mary Wollstonecraft's Critique of Adam Smith.”New Political Science 15 (1):63–76.

Pocock J. G. A. 2000.Machiavellian Moments [volume 47, number 16 October 19, 2000.]. New York Review of Books 2000. Available from http://www.nybooks.com/articles/13875.

Pocock J. G. A .1975.The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition.Princeton:Princeton University Press.

Kann Mark E .1998.A Republic of Men: The American Founders, Gendered Language, and Patriarchal Politics.New York:New York University Press.

Ryan Mary .1983.Womanhood in America: From Colonial Times to the Present.New York:F. Watts.

Skinner Quentin .1998.Liberty Before Liberalism.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Montesquieu Charles de Secondat, baronde .1989.The Spirit of the Laws.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. Originally published 1748.

Pitkin Hannah F. 1984.Fortune is a Woman: Gender and Politics in the Thought of Niccolo Machiavelli.With a new Afterword.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Machiavelli Niccolo .1994.Selected Political Writings,ed. David Wootton .Indianapolis:Hackett.Originally published 1517.

Hume David .1987.Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary.Indianapolis:Liberty Fund.Originally published 1777.

Larrère Catherine .2002.“Women, Republicanism and the Growth of Commerce.”In Republicanism: A Shared European Heritage,ed. M. van Gelderen and Q. Skinner .Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Rousseau Jean Jacques .1987.Political Writings,ed. P. Gay .Indianapolis:Hackett Publishing Company.Originally published 1750.

Wollstonecraft Mary .1975.A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.New York:Norton. Originally published 1792.

Norton Mary Beth .1980.Liberty's Daughters: The Revolutionary Experience of American Women, 1750–1800.Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.

American Political Science Association's Standing Committee on Civic Education and Engagement. 2004.Democracy at Risk: Renewing the Political Science of Citizenship.Online at: http://www.princeton.edu/∼apsaciv/apsaciv_final_review.pdf .

Rahe Paul .1994.Republics: Ancient and Modern.3 vols.Chapel Hill, NC:University of North Carolina Press.

Phillips Anne .2000.“Survey Article: Feminism and Republicanism: Is This a Plausible Alliance?”The Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (2):279–93.

Shoemaker Robert .1997.“Review of Michèle Cohen, Fashioning Masculinity: National Identity and Language in the Eighteenth Century.”Reviews in History 40.Available at http://www.history.ac.uk/reviews/paper/cohen.htm.

Kimmel Michael .1996.Manhood in America.New York:Free Press.

Ehrenreich Barbara .1995.The Snarling Citizen: Essays.New York:Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Poovey Mary .1988.Uneven Development: The Ideological Work of Gender in Mid-Victorian England.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Millar John .2003.“On the Origin of the Distinction of Ranks.”In Commerce, Culture, and Liberty: Readings on Capitalism Before Adam Smith,ed. Henry C. Clark .Indianapolis:Liberty Fund.Originally published 1771.

Felski Rita .1995.The gender of modernity.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.

Hamilton Alexander .1961.“The Utility of the Union as a Safeguard Against Domestic Faction and Insurrection”(Federalist 9).In The Federalist Papers,ed. C. Rossiter .New York:New American Library.Originally published 1788.