The Exposure Dilemma: Qualitative Study of Medical Student Opinions and Perceptions of Radiology

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal - Tập 66 - Trang 291-297 - 2015
Kari L. Visscher1, Georges Nassrallah2, Lisa Faden3, Daniele Wiseman1
1Department of Medical Imaging, London Health Sciences Centre – Victoria Hospital, London, Ontario, Canada
2Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, London, Ontario, Canada
3Centre for Education Research & Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada

Tóm tắt

Purpose According to a national survey of over 900 Canadian medical students, the stereotype of an isolated radiologist working in a dark room persists. The purpose of this study is to use qualitative methods to explore the ways exposure to radiology in medical school impacts students’ opinions and perceptions of radiology and radiologists. Methods After receiving ethics approval, 4 focus groups were conducted, 1 per year of undergraduate medical training at Western University. The transcribed audio recordings and accompanying field notes, together with the open-ended questions obtained from the national survey, were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Five hundred sixty students in medical school years 1 and 2 (preclerkship) participated in the national survey and 18 in the focus groups; 336 students in years 3 and 4 [clerkship] participated in the national survey and 10 in the focus groups. Three major findings emerged from the analysis of the data. First, stereotypes are perpetuated mainly through informal interactions. Second, there is limited exposure to radiology and radiologists in medical school, especially in preclerkship. Third, students want to know what to expect if they choose a career in radiology. Conclusions Medical students, especially those in preclerkship, are seeking accurate information to modify or reinforce radiology stereotypes. Limited exposure makes interactions with students impactful and mentorship essential. Students want meaningful interactions with radiologists and radiology residents.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Zener R, 2013, Paper presented at: European Congress of Radiology. 10.2214/AJR.05.2139 10.1016/j.acra.2008.03.015 10.1016/S1076-6332(97)80350-9 10.3109/0142159X.2012.704439 Khan M.E., 1991, World Health Stat Quart, 44, 145 Neergaard M.A., 2009, BMC, 9, 52 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa GreenbaumT.L. The Practical Handbook and Guide to Focus Group Research 1988 D.C. Heath Lexington, MA 10.1097/00012272-198604000-00004 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00253.x 10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.292 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.12.001 10.1016/j.acra.2011.10.028 10.1080/01421590601182602 10.1016/S1076-6332(00)80066-5 10.2214/ajr.159.1.1609700 InuiT.A. Flag in the Wind: Educating From Professionalism in Medicine 2003 Association of American Medical Colleges Washington, DC 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.12.397 10.1111/j.1741-6787.2007.00099.x Department for Communities and Local Government The Benefits of Meaningful Interaction. Rapid Evidence Assessment of Existing Literature 2011 Queen's Printer and Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office London, England Department for Communities and Local Government Guidance on Meaningful Interaction. How Encouraging Positive Relationships Between People Can Help Build Community Cohesion 2008 Communities and Local Government Wetherby, England 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03418.x MerriamS.B. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation 1st edition. 2009 Jossey-Bass San Francisco, CA 10.1016/j.jacr.2005.05.014
Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal

Tập 66

291-297

Thông tin tác giả