The Dynamic Capability of Corporate Diplomacy

Global Strategy Journal - Tập 6 Số 3 - Trang 183-196 - 2016
Witold J. Henisz1
1The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.

Tóm tắt

Plain language summaryCorporate diplomacy is the ability to win the hearts and minds of external stakeholders in support of an organizational mission. As compared to the narrow support function of external affairs, corporate diplomats play a central role not just in sensing risks and opportunities in the external environment, but also in shaping short‐ and long‐term strategic responses across all functions of their organizations. Managers interested in creating long‐term sustainable value for shareholders and society—especially in emerging markets—need to enhance their skills as corporate diplomats.Technical summarySuccess in corporate diplomacy (i.e., the ability to win the hearts and minds of external stakeholders) requires a complex set of seemingly incompatible routines and processes that together constitute a dynamic capability. The article draws explicit parallels between the technological environment in which the theory of dynamic capabilities was first developed and the stakeholder environment. Firms must sense opportunities and threats that emanate from the external stakeholder environment across multiple countries, sectors, and issue domains. In order to actually seize these opportunities or avoid these threats, however, the organization must actually engage with stakeholders in a manner perceived as genuine and caring and implement initiatives that address their issues of concern. Such responses require short‐ and long‐term strategic change within the core of the organization. Copyright © 2016 Strategic Management Society.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/eet.425

Boutilier RG, 2009, Stakeholder Politics: Social Capital, Sustainable Development and the Corporation

10.4128/9781606490983

Boutilier R, 2011, SME Mining Engineering Handbook, 1779

10.1016/0024-6301(91)90081-X

10.1016/j.lrp.2009.11.003

10.1177/014920630002600602

Diermeier D., 2011, Reputation Rules: Strategies for Building Your Company's Most Valuable Asset

10.2307/258541

10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E

Fombrun C, 1996, Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image

Henisz WJ, 2014, Corporate Diplomacy: Building Reputations and Relationships with External Stakeholders

Henisz WJ GrayT.2013.Calculating the net present value of sustainability at Newmont's Ahafo Gold Mine in Ghana. Teaching Cases 92‐93 The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.

HeniszWJ ZelnerBA.2016.Designing and implementing an integrated project management system at Minas‐Rio. Teaching Case The Wharton School University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia PA.

Hoben M, 2012, Corporate and community engagement in the Niger Delta: lessons learned from Chevron Nigeria Limited's GMOU process

JonesVN LukicJ BhallaA TapieroD.2011.Measuring returns on community investments in mining. Paper presented at the Conference on Social Responsibility in Mining Santiago Chile.

10.1002/csr.1277

10.1142/S1363919601000427

Lovegrove N, 2013, Triple‐strength leadership, Harvard Business Review, 91, 46

10.2307/256617

Miller R, The Oxford Handbook of Megaproject Management

Moloney K, 2004, A Handbook of Corporate Communication and Public Relations, 54

Musters R, 2013, Organizing the government‐affairs function for Impact, McKinsey Quarterly

10.5465/amr.2008.31193538

10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00015-3

10.1002/smj.4250140405

Schein EH, 1993, How can organizations learn faster? The challenge of entering the green room, MIT Sloan Management Review

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200002)21:2<175::AID-SMJ86>3.0.CO;2-L

10.1016/0195-9255(85)90040-X

10.1002/smj.640

10.1057/jibs.2013.54

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

10.5465/amp.2013.0133

Zandvliet L, 2009, Getting It Right: Making Corporate‐Community Relations Work