The Direct and Indirect Effects of Advertising Spending on Firm Value

Journal of Marketing - Tập 74 Số 1 - Trang 20-33 - 2010
Amit Joshi1, Dominique M. Hanssens2
1Marketing, Department of Marketing, College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida
2Bud Knapp Professor of Marketing, Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles

Tóm tắt

Marketing decision makers are increasingly aware of the importance of shareholder value maximization, which calls for an evaluation of the long-term effects of their actions on product-market response and investor response. However, the marketing literature to date has focused on the sales or profit response of marketing actions, and the goals of marketing have traditionally been formulated from a customer perspective. Recently, there have been a few studies of the long-term investor response to marketing actions. The current research investigates one important aspect of this impact, the long-term relationship between advertising spending and market capitalization. The authors hypothesize that advertising can have a direct effect on valuation (i.e., an effect beyond its indirect effect through sales revenue and profit response). The empirical results across two industries provide support for the hypothesis that advertising spending has a positive, long-term impact on own firms’ market capitalization and may have a negative impact on the valuation of a competitor of comparable size. The authors quantify the magnitude of this investor response effect for and discuss its implications for further research.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aaker David A., 1991, Managing Brand Equity.

10.1177/002224379403100204

10.1509/jmkr.38.4.485.18905

10.1509/jmkg.67.4.1.18688

10.1016/S0304-405X(96)00890-2

Bartimo Jim, 1991, The Wall Street Journal, 6

10.1177/002224377501200405

10.1111/0022-1082.00411

10.1086/296552

10.2307/3665583

10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01257.x

10.2307/1910133

Cockburn Iain, 1988, American Economic Review, 78, 419

10.1287/mksc.14.1.1

10.1287/mksc.14.1.1

10.1177/002224379903600401

10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00064-5

Dorfman R., 1954, American Economic Review, 44, 826

10.1287/mnsc.38.9.1264

10.2307/2325486

10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04398.x

10.1509/jmkg.70.1.003.qxd

10.1287/mnsc.1080.0939

10.1017/S0022109000001745

Gifford Dun, 1997, Harvard Business Review, 75, 11

Goldman Kevin, 1993, The Wall Street Journal, 8

Hanssens Dominique M., 2001, Market Response Models, 2

Heath Chip, 1990, Contemporary Issues in Decision Making, 93

10.1287/mksc.6.4.320

10.1093/rfs/14.3.659

10.2307/2491304

10.1287/mksc.1090.0495

Joshi Amit M., 2005, “The Direct, Indirect and Feedback Effects of Marketing Actions,”

10.1287/mksc.1080.0392

Kothari S. P., 2001, Journal of Accounting and Business, 31, 105

10.1023/A:1008197018776

10.1177/002224299505900106

Lipman Joanne, 1991, The Wall Street Journal, 6

10.1287/mksc.14.3.G133

Lodish Leonard M., 2007, Harvard Business Review, 85, 104

10.1287/mksc.1080.0389

10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00032-6

Mathur Lynette Knowles, 1997, Journal of Advertising Research, 37, 67

10.1111/j.1540-6261.1987.tb04565.x

10.1509/jmkg.67.1.63.18595

10.1287/mksc.20.1.1.10197

10.1287/mksc.1060.0205

10.1287/mksc.1060.0267

10.1509/jmkg.68.4.142.42724

Perron Pierre, 1990, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 8, 153, 10.1080/07350015.1990.10509786

Pope Kyle, 1992, The Wall Street Journal, 1

10.1509/jmkg.68.4.126.42735

10.1111/j.1465-7295.2008.00161.x

10.1287/mksc.12.1.28

10.1177/0148558X0802300306

10.1287/mksc.1080.0407

10.1509/jmkg.73.1.024