The Delphi technique: myths and realities

Journal of Advanced Nursing - Tập 41 Số 4 - Trang 376-382 - 2003
Catherine Powell1
1Lecturer in Child Health Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Tóm tắt

Aim. To outline the key concepts and principles of the Delphi technique.

Methods. Reference is made to a selection of studies that illustrate a variety of methodological interpretations. Drawing on Heshusius's concept of ‘goodness criteria’, particular emphasis is given to the question of scientific merit and means of evaluation.

Conclusion. Although the technique should be used with caution, it appears to be an established method of harnessing the opinions of an often diverse group of experts on practice‐related problems.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025331.x

10.1111/j.1365-2648.1982.tb00277.x

10.7748/ns1999.07.13.45.32.c2650

10.1016/S0882-5963(05)80061-2

10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22010024.x

10.1097/00005650-199909000-00012

CrottyM(1994)The Emerging Role of the Nurse Teacher in Project 2000 Programmes in England.Unpublished PhD Thesis University of Manchester Manchester.

10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb03146.x

10.1111/j.1440-1630.1995.tb01323.x

Delbecq A.L., 1975, Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal and Delphi Processes

10.1016/0020-7489(93)90033-Q

Everett A., 1993, Piercing the veil of the future: a review of the Delphi method of research, Professional Nurse, 9, 181

Fink A., 1991, Consensus Methods: Characteristics and Guidelines for Use RAND

10.1136/bmj.297.6658.1249

10.1046/j.1365-2702.1998.00175.x

GoodmanC(1986)A Delphi survey of clinical nursing research priorities within a Regional Health Authority.Unpublished MSc Thesis University of London London.

10.1111/j.1365-2648.1987.tb01376.x

10.1016/S0260-6917(95)80129-4

10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x

Heshusius L., 1990, The Paradigm Dialog, 198

Jairath N., 1994, The Delphi methodology: a useful administrative approach, Canadian Journal of Nursing Administration, 7, 29

10.1136/bmj.311.7001.376

Jones J.M.G., 1992, What will happen to the quality of care with fewer junior doctors? A Delphi study of consultant physicians' views, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians London, 26, 36

10.1016/S0020-7489(00)00044-4

10.1016/S1526-9523(99)00018-5

10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00544.x

10.1097/00006199-197511000-00006

Linstone H., 1975, The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications

10.1136/adc.80.5.410

10.1177/030802269806100903

10.1093/intqhc/3.2.89

10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01207.x

10.7748/nr2001.07.8.4.4.c6162

Mitroff I., 1975, The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, 17

Murphy M.K., 1998, Consensus development methods and their use in clinical guideline development, Health Technology Assessment, 2, 10.3310/hta2030

10.1093/heapol/8.4.405

10.1016/0038-0121(71)90041-3

Reid N., 1988, Professional Competence and Quality Assurance in the Caring Professions

10.1056/NEJM198103123041110

RoweE.(1994)Enhancing Judgement and Decision Making: a critical and empirical investigation of the Delphi technique.Unpublished PhD Thesis University of Western England Bristol.

Rowe G., 1991, Delphi: a re‐evaluation of research and theory, Technical Forecasting Social Change, 39, 235, 10.1016/0040-1625(91)90039-I

10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71

Sackman H., 1975, Delphi Critique

10.1097/00012272-198604000-00005

10.1016/S0882-5963(97)80002-4

Sleep J., 1999, Establishing priorities for research: report of a Delphi survey, British Journal of Midwifery, 3, 323, 10.12968/bjom.1995.3.6.323

10.1136/bmj.319.7204.224

10.1177/030802269706000607

10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01066.x