Đóng Góp Của Triết Học Khoa Học Trong Nghiên Cứu Giáo Dục Khoa Học: Một Tổng Quan Tài Liệu

Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2005). Developing deeper understandings of nature of science: The impact of a philosophy of science course on preservice science teachers’ views and instructional planning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(1), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690410001673810 Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690050044044 Abd-El-Khalick, F., Myers, J. Y., Summers, R., Brunner, J., Waight, N., Wahbeh, N., Zeineddin, A. A., & Belarmino, J. (2017). A longitudinal analysis of the extent and manner of representations of nature of science in U.S. high school biology and physics textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(1), 82–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21339 Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4%3c295::AID-TEA2%3e3.0.CO;2-2 Andersson-Bakken, E., Jegstad, K. M., & Bakken, J. (2020). Textbook tasks in the Norwegian school subject natural sciences: What views of science do they mediate? International Journal of Science Education, 42(8), 1320–1338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1756516 Archila, P. A. (2015). Using history and philosophy of science to promote students’ argumentation. Science & Education, 24(9–10), 1201–1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9786-2 Bächtold, M., & Munier, V. (2019). Teaching energy in high school by making use of history and philosophy of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(6), 765–796. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21522 Bialystok, L., Norris, T., & Pinto, L. E. (2019). Teaching and learning philosophy in Ontario high schools. JOURNAL OF CURRICULUM STUDIES, 51(5), 678–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2018.1563632 Boe, M. V., Henriksen, E. K., & Angell, C. (2018). Actual versus implied physics students: How students from traditional physics classrooms related to an innovative approach to quantum physics. Science Education, 102(4), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21339 Brito, A., Rodríguez, M. A., & Niaz, M. (2005). A reconstruction of development of the periodic table based on history and philosophy of science and its implications for general chemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 84–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20044 Coelho, R. L. (2012). Could HPS improve problem-solving? Science & Education, 22(5), 1043–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9521-1 Dibattista, L., & Morgese, F. (2012). Introducing history (and philosophy) of science in the classroom: A field research experience in Italy. Science & Education, 22(3), 543–576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9436-x Dunlop, L., Hodgson, A., & Stubbs, J. E. (2020). Building capabilities in chemistry education: Happiness and discomfort through philosophical dialogue in chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9rp00141g Erduran, S. (2001). Philosophy of chemistry: An emerging field with implications for chemistry education. Science & Education, 10(6), 581–593. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017564604949 Erduran, S. (2009). Beyond philosophical confusion: Establishing the role of philosophy of chemistry in chemical education research. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 8(1), 5–14. Erduran, S., & Mugaloglu, E. Z. (2014). Philosophy of chemistry in chemical education: Recent trends and future directions. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 287–315). Springer, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_10 Galili, I. (2012). Promotion of cultural content knowledge through the use of the history and philosophy of science. Science & Education, 21(9), 1283–1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9376-x Garritz, A. (2012). Teaching the philosophical interpretations of quantum mechanics and quantum chemistry through controversies. Science & Education, 22(7), 1787–1807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9444-x Gericke, N., Hagberg, M., & Jorde, D. (2012). Upper secondary students’ understanding of the use of multiple models in biology textbooks—The importance of conceptual variation and incommensurability. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 755–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9288-z Green, S., Andersen, H., Danielsen, K., Emmeche, C., Joas, C., Johansen, M. W., Nagayoshi, C., Witteveen, J., & Sørensen, H. K. (2021). Adapting practice-based philosophy of science to teaching of science students. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(3), 75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00393-2 Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2014). Teaching philosophy of science to scientists: Why, what and how. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 4(1), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-013-0078-x Gwimbi, E., & Monk, M. (2003). A study of the association of attitudes to the philosophy of science with classroom contexts, academic qualification and professional training, amongst A level biology teachers in Harare Zimbabwe. International Journal of Science Education, 25(4), 469–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690210145792 Gwimbi, E., & Monk, M. (2010). The reproduction of social stratification in Zimbabwe: A study of the attitudes and practices of A-level biology teachers in Harare. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690301908 Henke, A., & Höttecke, D. (2014). Physics teachers’ challenges in using history and philosophy of science in teaching. Science & Education, 24(4), 349–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-014-9737-3 Höttecke, D., & Silva, C. C. (2010). Why implementing history and philosophy in school science education is a challenge: An analysis of obstacles. Science & Education, 20(3–4), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9285-4 Höttecke, D., Henke, A., & Riess, F. (2010). Implementing history and philosophy in science teaching: Strategies, methods, results and experiences from the European HIPST project. Science & Education, 21(9), 1233–1261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9330-3 Irez, S. (2006). Are we prepared?: An assessment of preservice science teacher educators’ beliefs about nature of science. Science Education, 90(6), 1113–1143. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20156 Izquierdo-Aymerich, M. (2013). School chemistry: An historical and philosophical approach. Science & Education, 22(7), 1633–1653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9457-5 Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. (2000). History and philosophy of science through models: Some challenges in the case of “the atom.” International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 993–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900416875 Kaya, E., & Erduran, S. (2011). Integrating epistemological perspectives on chemistry in chemical education: The cases of concept duality, chemical language, and structural explanations. Science & Education, 22(7), 1741–1755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9399-3 Klausen, S. H., & Brande, M. (2016). Philosophy of science in Danish upper secondary education. OER Commons. Retrieved May 7, 2023, from https://portal.findresearcher.sdu.dk/da/publications/philosophy-of-science-in-danish-upper-secondary-education Kleinhans, M. G. (2021). Down to Earth: History and philosophy of geoscience in practice for undergraduate education. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(3), 81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00402-4 Korsager, M., Fiskum, K., Reitan, B., & Erduran, S. (2022). Nature of science in science textbooks for vocational training in Norway. Research in Science & Technological Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2135498 Lampert, Y. (2020). Teaching the nature of science from a philosophical perspective. Science & Education, 29(5), 1417–1439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00149-z Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science [Article]. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034 Lee, S.W.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2012). Technology-supported learning in secondary and undergraduate biological education: Observations from literature review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(2), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-012-9388-6 Matthews, M. R. (1989). A role for history and philosophy in science teaching. Interchange, 20(2), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807043 Matthews, M. R. (2004). Thomas Kuhn’s impact on science education: What lessons can be learned? Science Education, 28(1), 90–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10111 Matthews, M. R. (2008). Teaching the philosophical and worldview components of science. Science & Education, 18(6–7), 697–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9132-4 Matthews, M. R. (2014). Discipline-based philosophy of education and classroom teaching. Theory and Research in Education, 12(1), 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878513517341 Matthews, M. R. (2022). Thomas Kuhn and science education learning from the past and the importance of history and philosophy of science. Science & Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00408-1 Maurício, P., Valente, B., & Chagas, I. (2015). A didactic sequence of elementary geometric optics informed by history and philosophy of science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(3), 527–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9662-1 Maurício, P., Valente, B., & Chagas, I. (2016). A teaching-learning sequence of colour informed by history and philosophy of science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(7), 1177–1194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9736-8 Mellado, V., Ruiz, C., Bermejo, M. L., & Jiménez, R. (2006). Contributions from the philosophy of science to the education of science teachers. Science & Education, 15(5), 419–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-005-8920-y Milanovic, V. D., & Trivic, D. D. (2021). Chemistry teachers’ views on the nature of science and history and philosophy of science. Journal of Education for Teaching, 48(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1971051 Niaz, M. (2000). The oil drop experiment: A rational reconstruction of the Millikan-Ehrenhaft controversy and its implications for chemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 480–508. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5%3c480::AID-TEA6%3e3.0.CO;2-X Niaz, M. (2001). A rational reconstruction of the origin of the covalent bond and its implications for general chemistry textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 23(6), 623–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010006491 Niaz, M. (2007). Progressive transitions in chemistry teachers’ understanding of nature of science based on historical controversies. Science & Education, 18(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9082-x Niaz, M. (2010). Science curriculum and teacher education: The role of presuppositions, contradictions, controversies and speculations vs Kuhn’s ‘normal science.’ Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 891–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.028 Niaz, M., Aguilera, D., Maza, A., & Liendo, G. (2002). Arguments, contradictions, resistances, and conceptual change in students’ understanding of atomic structure. Science Education, 86(4), 505–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10035 Niaz, M., Klassen, S., McMillan, B., & Metz, D. (2010). Reconstruction of the history of the photoelectric effect and its implications for general physics textbooks. Science Education, 94(5), 903–931. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20389 Oh, J. Y. (2011). Using an enhanced conflict map in the classroom (photoelectric effect) based on Lakatosian heuristic principle strategies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9(5), 1135–1166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9252-1 Oh, J. Y. (2017). Suggesting a NOS map for nature of science for science education instruction. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(5), 1461–1483. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00680a Oh, J.-Y., Lee, H., & Lee, S.-S. (2016). Using the Lakatosian Conflict Map for conceptual change of pre-service elementary teachers about the seasons. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(1), 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2016.1222359 O’Reilly, C., Devitt, A., & Hayes, N. (2022). Critical thinking in the preschool classroom - A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101110 Park, J. (2001). Analysis of students’ processes of confirmation and falsification of their prior ideas about electrostatics. International Journal of Science Education, 23(12), 1219–1236. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110049097 Pronskikh, V., & Sorina, G. V. (2022). Expert text analysis in the inclusion of history and philosophy of science in higher education. Sci Educ (dordr), 31(4), 961–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00280-5 Reiss, M. J. (2020). Science education in the light of COVID-19: The contribution of history, philosophy and sociology of science. Sci Educ (dordr), 29(4), 1079–1092. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00143-5 Reydon, T. A. C. (2021). Misconceptions, conceptual pluralism, and conceptual toolkits: Bringing the philosophy of science to the teaching of evolution. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-021-00363-8 Ribeiro, M. A. P., & Pereira, D. C. (2012). Constitutive pluralism of chemistry: Thought planning, curriculum, epistemological and didactic orientations. Science & Education, 22(7), 1809–1837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9434-4 Rodriguez, M. A., & Niaz, M. (2004). The oil drop experiment: An illustration of scientific research methodology and its implications for physics textbooks. Instructional Science, 32(5), 357–386. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TRUC.0000044641.19894.ed Rosa, K., & Martins, M. C. (2008). Approaches and methodologies for a course on history and epistemology of physics: Analyzing the experience of a Brazilian university. Science & Education, 18(1), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-008-9138-6 Russ, R. S., & Odden, T. O. B. (2017). Intertwining evidence- and model-based reasoning in physics sensemaking: An example from electrostatics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2), 020105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020105 Sarıtaş, D., Özcan, H., & Adúriz-Bravo, A. (2021). Observation and inference in chemistry teaching: A model-based approach to the integration of the macro and submicro levels. Science & Education, 30(5), 1289–1314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00216-z Sendur, G., Polat, M., & Kazanci, C. (2017). Does a course on the history and philosophy of chemistry have any effect on prospective chemistry teachers’ perceptions? The case of chemistry and the chemist. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 601–629. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7rp00054e Shi, W. Z. (2015). Utilizing history and philosophy of science (HPS) to teach physics: The case of electromagnetic theory. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(3), 551–557. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1329a Shi, X. (2020). Using explicit teaching of philosophy to promote understanding of the nature of science. Science & Education, 30(2), 409–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00173-z Sin, C. (2014). Epistemology, sociology, and learning and teaching in physics. Science Education, 98(2), 342–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21100 Talanquer, V. (2013). School chemistry: The need for transgression. Science & Education, 22(7), 1757–1773. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9392-x Teixeira, E. S., Greca, I. M., & Freire, O. (2009). The history and philosophy of science in physics teaching: A research synthesis of didactic interventions. Science & Education, 21(6), 771–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9217-3 Tsai, C.-C. (2006). Reinterpreting and reconstructing science: Teachers’ view changes toward the nature of science by courses of science education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(3), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.06.010 Tsybulsky, D., Dodick, J., & Camhi, J. (2018). High-school students in university research labs? Implementing an outreach model based on the ‘science as inquiry’ approach. Journal of Biological Education, 52(4), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2017.1403360 Van Aalsvoort, J. (2004). Logical positivism as a tool to analyse the problem of chemistry’s lack of relevance in secondary school chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 26(9), 1151–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000205369 van Dijk, E. M., & Reydon, T. A. C. (2009). A conceptual analysis of evolutionary theory for teacher education. Science & Education, 19(6–8), 655–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9190-x Vesterinen, V.-M., Aksela, M., & Lavonen, J. (2011). Quantitative analysis of representations of nature of science in nordic upper secondary school textbooks using framework of analysis based on philosophy of chemistry. Science & Education, 22(7), 1839–1855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-011-9400-1 Villani, A., Dias, V. S., & Valadares, J. M. (2009). The development of science education research in Brazil and contributions from the history and philosophy of science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 907–937. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902855711 Vosniadou, S. (2019). The development of students’ understanding of science. Frontiers in Education, 4, 32. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00032