The Characterization and Evolution of Strategies About Vector Equations in the Game Vector Unknown
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adiredja, A., Bélanger-Rioux, R., & Zandieh, M. (2019). Everyday examples about basis from students: An anti-deficit approach in the classroom. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 30(5), 520–538.
Andrews-Larson, C., Wawro, M., & Zandieh, M. (2017). A hypothetical learning trajectory for conceptualizing matrices as linear transformations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(6), 809–829.
Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Byun, J.-H., & Joung, E. (2018). Digital game-based learning for K–12 mathematics education: A meta-analysis. School Science and Mathematics, 118(3–4), 113–126.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
Coleman, T., & Money, A. (2020). Student-centered digital game-based learning: A conceptual framework and survey of the state of the art. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 79(3), 415–457.
Dorier, J.-L., & Sierpinska, A. (2001). Research into the teaching and learning of linear algebra. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level (pp. 255–273). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Foster, A., & Shah, M. (2015). The play curricular activity reflection discussion model for game-based learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(2), 71–88.
Gee, J. (2005). Learning by design: Good video games as learning machines. e-Learning, 2(1), 5–16.
Gingold, Y. (2006). From rock, paper, scissors to Street Fighter II: Proof by construction. In Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on video games (pp. 155–158). ACM.
Gresalfi, M., & Barnes, J. (2016). Designing feedback in an immersive videogame: Supporting student mathematical engagement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(1), 65–86.
Harel, G. (1999). Students’ understanding of proofs: A historical analysis and implications for the teaching of geometry and linear algebra. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 302–303, 601–613.
Hillel, J. (2000). Modes of description and the problem of representation in linear algebra. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 191–207). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hollebrands, K. (2007). The role of a dynamic software program for geometry in the strategies high school mathematics students employ. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 164–192.
Jorgensen, R., & Lowrie, T., (2012). Digital games for learning mathematics: Possibilities and limitations. In J. Dindyal, L. Cheng & S. Ng (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia(pp. 378–384).Singapore: MERGA.
Ke, F., & Clark, K. (2020). Game-based multimodal representations and mathematical problem solving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(1), 103–122.
Larson, C., & Zandieh, M. (2013). Three interpretations of the matrix equation Ax = b. For the Learning of Mathematics, 33(2), 11–17.
Mauntel, M., Sipes, J., Zandieh, M., Plaxco, D., & Levine, B. (2019). “Let’s see”: Students play Vector Unknown, an inquiry-oriented linear algebra digital game. In A. Weinberg, D. Moore-Russo, H. Soto, and M. Wawro (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 959–965). Oklahoma City, OK: Mathematical Association of America.
Mauntel, M., Levine, B., J., Plaxco, D., & Zandieh, M. (2020). Get that basket! Deciphering student strategies in the linear algebra game vector unknown. In Karunakaran, S. S., Reed, Z., & Higgins, A. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, Boston.
Nishizawa, H., Shimada, K., Ohno, W., & Yoshioka, T. (2013). Increasing reality and merits of a virtual game. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 32–40.
Sierpinska, A. (2000). On some aspects of students’ thinking in linear algebra. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 209–246). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sinclair, N., & Tabaghi, S. (2010). Drawing space: Mathematicians’ kinetic conceptions of eigenvectors. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(3), 223–240.
Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. (2010). Student learning of basis, span and linear independence in linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(2), 173–188.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Sage Publications.
Trigueros, M. (2018). Learning linear algebra using models and conceptual activities. In S. Stewart, C. Andrews-Larson, A. Berman, & M. Zandieh (Eds.), Challenges and strategies in teaching linear algebra (pp. 29–50). Springer.
Wawro, M., Rasmussen, C., Zandieh, M., Sweeney, G., & Larson, C. (2012). An inquiry-oriented approach to span and linear independence: The case of the magic carpet ride sequence. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 22(8), 577–599.
Wawro, M., Zandieh, M., Rasmussen, C., & Andrews-Larson, C. (2021). Inquiry-oriented linear algebra: Course materials. http://iola.math.vt.edu.
Williams-Pierce, C. (2019). Designing for mathematical play: Failure and feedback. Information and Learning Sciences, 120(9–10), 589–610.
Williams-Pierce, C. & Thevenow-Harrison, J. T. (2021) Zones of mathematical play. Journal of the Learning Sciences. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.1913167.
Zandieh, M., Plaxco, D., Williams-Pierce, C., & Amresh, A. (2018). Drawing on three fields of education research to frame the development of digital games for inquiry-oriented linear algebra. In A. Weinberg, C. Rasmussen, J. Rabin, M. Wawro & S. Brown (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 1270–1279). San Diego, CA: Mathematical Association of America.