The Association between Flipped Learning Readiness, Engagement, Social anxiety, and Achievement in Online Flipped Classrooms: a Structural Equational Modeling
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abuhmaid, A., & Mohammad, A. (2020). The impact of flipped learning on procrastination and students’ attitudes toward IT. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 566–573. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080228
Ajmal, M., & Ahmad, S. (2019). Exploration of anxiety factors among students of distance learning: A case study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Bulletin of Education and Research, 41(2), 67–78. http://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/ier/PDF-FILES/6_41_2_19.pdf
Akçayir, G., & Akçayir, M. (2018). The FC: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
Asher, M., & Aderka, I. M. (2020). Dating with social anxiety: An empirical examination of momentary anxiety and desire for future interaction. Clinical Psychological Science, 8(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702619867055
Asher, M., Asnaani, A., & Aderka, I. M. (2017). Gender differences in social anxiety disorder: A review. Clinical Psychology Review, 56, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.05.004
Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education
Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The FC: A survey of the research. In Proceedings of 2013 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) National Conference, Atlanta, GA. http://www.asee.org/public/conferences/20/papers/6219/view
Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K-12: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 151, Article 103819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103819
Butt, A. (2014). Student views on the use of a FC approach: Evidence from Australia. Business Education & Accreditation, 6(1), 33–43. http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/beaccr/bea-v6n1-2014/BEA-V6N1-2014-4.pdf
Cederlund, R., & Öst, L. G. (2013). Psychometric properties of the social phobia and anxiety inventory-child version in a Swedish clinical sample. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 27(5), 503e511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.06.004
Chiu, C. M., & Wang, E. T. G. (2008). Understanding web-based learning continuance intention: The role of subjective task value. Information & Management, 45(3), 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.02.003
Chuang, H. H., Weng, C. Y., & Chen, C. H. (2018). Which students benefit most from a FC approach to language learning? British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12530
Clark, D. A., & Beck, A. T. (2012). The anxiety and worry workbook: The cognitive therapy solution. Guilford Press
Clark, K. R. (2015). The Effects of the flipped model of instruction on student engagement and performance in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 12(1), 91–115. https://www.thejeo.com/archive/2015_12_1/clark
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
Çevik, Ö., Rıdvan, A. T. A., & Çevik, M. (2021). Bullying and victimization among Turkish adolescents: The predictive role of problematic internet use, school burnout and parental monitoring. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 3203–3230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10410-1
Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The Online Student Engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4), https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.561
Driscoll, A., Jicha, K., Hunt, A. N., Tichavsky, L., & Thompson, G. (2012). Can online courses deliver in-class results? A comparison of student performance and satisfaction in an online versus a face‐to‐face introductory sociology course. Teaching Sociology, 40(4), 312–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X12446624
Eryılmaz, M., & Çiğdemoğlu, C. (2019). Individual flipped learning and cooperative flipped learning: Their effects on students’ performance, social, and computer anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 432–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1522652
Esfijani, A. (2018). Measuring quality in online education: A meta-synthesis. American Journal of Distance Education, 32(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2018.1417658
Fairchild, A. J., Horst, S. J., Finney, S. J., & Barron, K. E. (2005). Evaluating existing and new validity evidence for the Academic Motivation Scale. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(3), 331–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.11.001
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Fulton, K. P. (2012). 10 reasons to flip. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209400205
Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., & Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the FC. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008
Grieve, R., Kemp, N., Norris, K., & Padgett, C. R. (2017). Push or pull? Unpacking the social compensation hypothesis of Internet use in an educational context. Computers & Education, 109, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.008
Hao, Y. (2016). Exploring undergraduates’ perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their FC s. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.032
Harbour, K. E., Evanovich, L. L., Sweigart, C. A., & Hughes, L. E. (2015). A brief review of effective teaching practices that maximize student engagement. Preventing School Failure, 59(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2014.919136
Heimberg, R. G., Horner, K. J., Juster, H. R., Safren, S. A., Brown, E. J., Schneier, F. R., & Liebowitz, M. R. (1999). Psychometric properties of the Liebowitz social anxiety scale. Psychological Medicine, 29(1), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291798007879
Herreid, C. F., & Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the Flipped Classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62–66. https://www.aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/PKAL_regional/CRWG-SPEE-REF-01.pdf
Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
Hodges, C. B. (2008). Self-efficacy in the context of online learning environments: A review of the literature and directions for research. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20(3‐4), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.20001
Hwang, M. Y., Hong, J. C., Tai, K. H., Chen, J. T., & Gouldthorp, T. (2020). The relationship between the online social anxiety, perceived information overload and fatigue, and job engagement of civil servant LINE users. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101423
Jeong, H., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Jo, K. (2019). Ten years of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning: A meta-analysis of CSCL in STEM education during 2005–2014. Educational research review, 28, 100284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100284
Jiang, L., Meng, H., & Zhou, N. (2021). English learners’ readiness for online flipped learning: Interrelationships with motivation and engagement, attitude, and support. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211027459
Jiang, L. J., Zang, N., Zhou, N., & Cao, H. (2021). English teachers’ intention to use flipped teaching: Interrelationships with needs satisfaction, motivation, self-efficacy, belief, and support. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1846566
Karaoğlan Yılmaz, F. G., & Yılmaz, R. (2020). Student opinions about personalized recommendation and feedback based on learning analytics. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25, 753–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09460-8
Kemp, N., & Grieve, R. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates’ opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1278. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01278
Keskin, S., Şahin, M., Uluç, S., & Yurdugul, H. (2020). Online learners’ interactions and social anxiety: The social anxiety scale for e-learning environments (SASE). Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1769681
Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three FC s in an urban university: An exploration of design principles. Internet & Higher Education, 22, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003
Kim, S. Y., Kim, M. S., Park, B., Kim, J. H., & Choi, H. G. (2017). The associations between internet use time and school performance among Korean adolescents differ according to the purpose of internet use. PloS One, 12(4), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174878. Article e0174878
Klassen, R., & Tze, V. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 12, 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001
Korzynski, P., Rook, C., Treacy, E. F., & de Vries, M. K. (2020). The impact of self-esteem, conscientiousness and pseudo-personality on technostress. Internet Research, 31(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2020-0141
Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated FC approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
Larcara, M. (2015). Benefits of the FC model. In M. Larcara (Ed.), Curriculum Design and Classroom Management: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications (pp. 132–144). IGI Global
Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1995). The self-presentation model of social phobia. In R. G. Heimberg (Ed.), Social phobia: Diagnosis, Assessment, and Treatment (pp. 94–112). Guilford Press
Lee, J., & Choi, H. (2019). Rethinking the flipped learning pre-class: Its influence on the success of flipped learning and related factors. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2), 934–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12618
Lee, C., Yeung, A. S., & Ip, T. (2017). University English language learners’ readiness to use computer technology for self-directed learning. System, 67, 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.05.001
Lim, J. M. (2016). Predicting successful completion using student delay indicators in undergraduate self-paced online courses. Distance Education, 37(3), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1233050
Liu, S., Liu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2020). Somatic symptoms and concern regarding COVID-19 among Chinese college and primary school students: A cross-sectional survey. Psychiatry Research, 289, Article 113070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113070
Lo, C. K., Lie, C. W., & Hew, K. F. (2018). Applying “First Principles of Instruction” as a design theory of the flipped classroom: Findings from a collective study of four secondary school subjects. Computers & Education, 118, 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.003
Love, B., Hodge, A., Grandgenett, N., & Swift, A. W. (2014). Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(3), 317–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.822582
Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159. Article 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
Mason, G. S., Shuman, T. R., & Cook, K. E. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of an inverted classroom to a traditional classroom in an upper-division engineering course. IEEE Transactions on Education, 56(4), 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2013.2249066
Mattick, R. P., & Clarke, J. C. (1998). Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(4), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(97)10031-6
McCord, B., Rodebaugh, T. L., & Levinson, C. A. (2014). Facebook: Social uses and anxiety Computers in Human Behavior, 34(2014), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.020
McCarthy, J. (2016). Reflections on a flipped classroom in first year higher education. Issues in Educational Research, 26(2), 332–350. http://www.iier.org.au/iier26/mccarthy-j.html
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02505024
Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L., & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction. The Journal of Nursing Education, 52(10), 597–599. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20130919-03
Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N., & O’Dowd, D. K. (2010). Learn before lecture: A strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE-life Sciences Education, 9(4), 473–481. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-04-0063
Murillo-Zamorano, L. R., Ángel, J., Sánchez, L., & Godoy-Caballero, A. L. (2019). How the FC affects knowledge, skills, and engagement in higher education: Effects on students’ satisfaction. Computers & Education, 141. Article 103608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103608
O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of FC s in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
Otter, R. R., Seipel, S., Graeff, T., Alexander, B., Boraiko, C., Gray, J. … Sadler, K. (2013). Comparing student and faculty perceptions of online and traditional courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.08.001
Peled, Y., Blau, I., & Grinberg, R. (2015). Does 1:1 computing in a junior high-school change the pedagogical perspectives of teachers and their educational discourse. Interdisciplinary Journal of e-Skills and Lifelong Learning-IJELL, 11, 257–271. https://doi.org/10.28945/2311
Polat, E. , Hopcan, S. & Kamalı Arslantaş, T. (2022). Çevrimiçi öğrenci bağlılık ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması [Adaption of online student engagement scale to Turkish: Validity and Reliability Study]. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 12 (1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.936669
Pierce, T. (2009). Social anxiety and technology: Face-to-face communication versus technological communication among teens. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(6), 1367–1372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.06.003
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Robotham, D., & Julian, C. (2006). Stress and the higher education student: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 30(2), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770600617513
Russell, G. C., & Shaw, S. (2009). A study to investigate the prevalence of social anxiety in a sample of higher education students in the UK. Journal of Mental Health, 18(3), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638230802522494
Russell, G., & Topham, P. (2012). The impact of social anxiety on student learning and well-being in higher education. Journal of Mental Health, 21(4), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2012.694505
Schunk, D. H. (2018). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson
Schwarzenberg, P., Navon, J., Nussbaum, M., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Caballero, D. (2018). Learning experience assessment of flipped courses. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(2), 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9159-8
Soffer, T., & Nachmias, R. (2018). Effectiveness of learning in online academic courses compared with face-to‐face courses in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34, 534–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12258
Song, L., & Hill, J. R. (2007). A conceptual model for understanding self-directed learning in online environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27–42. http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/6.1.3.pdf
Steimer, T. (2002). The biology of fear- and anxiety-related behaviors. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 4(3), 231–249. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2002.4.3/tsteimer
Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The FC: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30, Article 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314
Stöhr, C., Demazière, C., & Adawi, T. (2020). The polarizing effect of the online FC. Computers and Education, 147, Article 103789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103789
Şendağ, S., & Odabaşı, H. F. (2009). Effects of an online problem based learning course on content knowledge acquisition and critical thinking skills. Computers & Education, 53(1), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.008
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon
Tang, T., Abuhmaid, A. M., Olaimat, M., Oudat, D. M., Aldhaeebi, M., & Bamanger, E. (2020). Efficiency of FC with online-based teaching under COVID-19. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1817761
Thai, T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a FC design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers & Education, 107, 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003
Topham, P., & Russell, G. (2012). Social anxiety in higher education. The Psychologist, 25(4), 280–282. https://thepsychologist.bps.org.uk/volume-25/edition-4/social-anxiety-higher-education
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.2.267
van der Velde, R., Blignaut-van Westrhenen, N., Labrie, N. H. M., & Zweekhorst, M. B. M. (2021). The idea is nice… but not for me”: First-year students’ readiness for large-scale ‘flipped lectures’—what (de)motivates them? Higher Education, 81(6), 1157–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00604-4
Wang, F. H. (2017). An exploration of online behaviour engagement and achievement in FC supported by learning management system. Computers & Education, 114, 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.012
Yen, J. Y., Yen, C. F., Chen, C. S., Wang, P. W., Chang, Y. H., & Ko, C. H. (2012). Social anxiety in online and real-life interaction and their associated factors. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0015
Yen, T. F. (2020). The performance of online teaching for FC based on COVID-19 aspect. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 8(3), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2020/v8i330229
Yıldız-Durak, H. (2017). Turkish adaptation of the flipped learning readiness scale for middle school students. Bartin University Journal of Faculty of Education, 6(3), 1056–1068. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.328826
Yıldız-Durak, H. (2018). Flipped learning readiness in teaching programming in middle schools: Modelling its relation to various variables. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(6), 939–959. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12302
Yıldız-Durak, H. (2020). Modeling Different Variables in Learning Basic Concepts of Programming in FCs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(1), 160–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633119827956
Yılmaz, R. (2017). Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in FCs. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.085
Young, C. M. Y., & Lo, B. C. Y. (2012). Cognitive appraisal mediating relationship between social anxiety and internet communication in adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(1), 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.09.001
Zainuddin, Z., Shujahat, M., Chu, S. K. W., Haruna, H., & Farida, R. (2019). The effects of gamified flipped instruction on learner performance and need satisfaction. Information and Learning Sciences, 120(11), 789–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-07-2019-0067
Zhang, C. L., & Zhou, Z. K. (2018). Passive social network site use, social anxiety, rumination and depression in adolescents. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26(3), 490–497