The Anglo‐American versus the Continental European corporate governance model: empirical evidence of board composition in Belgium

Emerald - Tập 14 Số 6 - Trang 437-449 - 2002
HubertOoghe1, TineDe Langhe2
1Hubert Ooghe is a Professor, Ernst & Young Chair of Growth Management and Institute of Credit Management (Gerling‐Graydon‐IFB), Vlerick Leuven Gent Management School and Department of Corporate Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
2Tine De Langhe is an Assistant at the Department of Corporate Finance, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Tóm tắt

Compares two corporate governance models: the Anglo‐American and the Continental European model. These corporate governance models differ strongly, and the differences are mainly due to differences in the business context. The problems arising from separation of ownership from control will thus have to be solved through different mechanisms. One important mechanism is the board of directors. The board composition of 122 companies has been analyzed in a Belgian empirical study. From the tests, finds a significant positive relationship between the number of directors in the board and a range of other factors. Shareholder structure does not seem to have an effect on the size of the board. A second variable concerning the composition of the board, is the percentage of external directors. Finds that the number of external directors differs significantly between companies with a different nationality and between companies that are listed or not. Size, shareholder structure and industry were not related to the percentage of external directors in a company.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Baliga, B.R., Moyer, R.C. and Rao, R.C.S. (1996), “CEO duality and firm performance: what’s the fuss?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 41‐53.

Becht, B. and Röell, A. (1999), “Corporate governance in Europe, blockholdings in Europe: an international comparison”, European Economic Review, Vol. 43, pp. 1049‐56.

Becht, M., Chapelle, A. and Renneboog, L. (2000), “Shareholdings cascades: the separation of ownership and control in Belgium”, forthcoming in Barca, F. and Becht, M. (Eds), Ownership and Control: A European Perspective, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Boyd, B.K. (1995), “CEO duality and firm performance, a contingency model”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 301‐12.

Brickley, J., Coles, J. and Jarrell, G. (1997), “Leadership structure: separating the CEO and chairman of the board”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 4, pp. 189‐220.

Byrd, J. and Hickman, K. (1992), “The case for independent outside directors”, Continental Bank Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Vol. 5, pp. 78‐82.

Cadbury, A. (1992), Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, Gee, London.

Chaganti, R., Mahajan, V. and Sharma, R. (1985), “Corporate board size, composition and corporate failures in the retailing industry”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 400‐17.

Charkman, J. (1994), “A larger role for institutional investors”, in Dimsdale, N. and Prevezer, M. (Eds), Capital Markets and Corporate Governance, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Conyon, M.J. (1994), “Corporate governance changes in UK companies between 1988 and 1993”, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Vol. 2, pp. 87‐93.

Coughlan, A.T. and Schmidt, R.M. (1985), “Executive compensation, management turnover and firm performance: an empirical investigation”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 7, pp. 43‐66.

Dahya, J. and Travlos, N.G. (2000), “Does the one man show pay? Theory and evidence on the dual CEO revisited”, European Financial Management, Vol. 6, pp. 85‐98.

Dalton, D.R. and Kesner, I.F. (1987), “Composition and CEO duality in boards of directors: an international perspective”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 28, pp. 33‐42.

DeAngelo, L.E. (1988), “Managerial competition, information costs, and corporate governance: the use of accounting performance measures in proxy contests”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 10, pp. 3‐36.

Denis, D.J. and Sarin, A. (1999), “Ownership and board structures in publicly traded corporations”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 52, pp. 187‐223.

Donaldson, L. and Davis, J. (1991), “Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns”, Australian Journal of Management, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 49‐64.

Drucker, P.F. (1991), “Reckoning with the pension fund revolution”, Harvard Business Review, March‐April, pp. 106‐14.

Fama, C.F. and Jensen, M.C. (1983), “Separation of ownership and control”, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 26, pp. 301‐25.

Firstenberg, P.B. and Malkiel, B.G. (1994), “The twenty‐first century boardroom: who will be in charge?”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 36, pp. 27‐35.

Franks, J.R. and Mayer, C. (1994), Corporate Control: A Synthesis of the International Rvidence, IFA Working Paper, pp. 165‐92.

Garvey, G.T. and Swan, P.L. (1994), “The economics of corporate governance: beyond the Marshallian firm”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 1, pp. 139‐74.

Gelauff, G.M.M. and Den Broeder, C. (1997), “Governance of stakeholder relationships: the German and Dutch experience”, SUERF Studies, No. 1.

Gibbons, R. and Murphy, K.J. (1992), “Optimal incentive contracts in the presence of career concerns: theory and evidence”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 100, pp. 468‐505.

Gilson, S.C. and Vetsuypens, M.R. (1993), “CEO compensation in financially distressed firms: an empirical analysis”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, pp. 425‐58.

Hanson, R.C. and Song, M.H. (2000), “Managerial ownership, board structure, and the division of gains in divestitures”, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 6, pp. 55‐70.

Jensen, M.C. (1986), “Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers”, American Economic Review, Vol. 76, pp. 323‐9.

Jensen, M.C. (1993), “The modern industrial revolution, exit, and failure of internal control systems”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, pp. 831‐80.

Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H. (1976), “Theory of the firm, managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 305‐60.

Jensen, M.C. and Murphy, K.J. (1990), “Performance pay and top management incentives”, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 90 No. 2, pp. 225‐64.

Jensen, M.C. and Ruback, R.S. (1983), “The market for corporate control: the scientific evidence”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 11, pp. 5‐50.

Kaplan, S.N. (1994), “Top executives, turnover, and firm performance in Germany”, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol. 10, pp. 142‐59.

Kaplan, S.N. and Reishus, D. (1990), “Outside directorship and corporate performance”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 27, pp. 389‐410.

Keasy, K. and Wright, M. (1997), Corporate Governance: Responsibilities, Risks and Remuneration, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

LaPorta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (1998), Corporate Ownership Around the World, available at: www.ecgn.ulb.ac.be/ecgn/ (accessed 29 May 2001).

Lipton, M. and Lorsch, J.W. (1992), “A modest proposal for improved corporate governance”, The Business Lawyer, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 59‐77.

Lorsch, J.W., and MacIver, E.A. (1989), Pawns or Potentates: The Reality of America’s Corporate Boards, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

McClelland, D. and Burnham, D.H. (1976), “Power is the great motivator”, Harvard Business Review, March‐April, pp. 100‐10.

Malette, P. and Hogler, R.L. (1995), “Board composition, stock ownership and the exemption of directors from liability”, Journal of Management, Vol. 21, pp. 861‐78.

Martin, K.J. and McConnell, J.J. (1991), “Corporate performance, corporate takeovers, and management turnover”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 46, pp. 671‐87.

Maug, E. (1998), “Large shareholders as monitors: is there a trade‐off between liquidity and control?”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 53 No. 1, pp. 65‐98.

Mayer, C. (2000), Ownership Matters, available at: www.ecgn.ulb.ac.be/ecgn/ (29 May 2001).

Moerland, P.W. (1996), “Ontwikkelingen rondom corporate governance”, Working Paper, Catholic University Brabant, Tilburg.

Odgen, S. and Watson, R. (1996), “The relationships between changes in incentive structures, executive pay and corporate performance: some evidence from the privatised water industry in England and Wales”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 23, pp. 721‐51.

Pi, L. and Timme, A. (1993), “Corporate control and bank efficiency”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 17, pp. 515‐30.

Prowse, S. (1994), “Corporate governance in an international perspective: a survey of corporate control mechanisms among large firms in the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan and Germany, Bank of International Settlements”, Economic Papers, No. 41.

Rechner, P. and Dalton, D. (1991), “CEO duality and organisational performance: a longitudinal analysis”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 85‐99.

Renneboog, L. (1996), “Ownership, managerial control and the governance of companies listed on the Brussels Stock Exchange”, Research Paper No. 9635, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven.

Ruback, R.S. (1988), “Do target shareholders lose in unsuccessful control contests?” in Auerbach, A.J. (Ed.), Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

Sappington, D. (1983), “Limited liability contracts between principal and agent”, Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 29, pp. 1‐21.

Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1997), “A survey of corporate governance”, Journal of Finance, Vol. 2, pp. 737‐83.

Taylor, W. (1990), “Can big owners make a difference?”, Harvard Business Review, September‐October, pp. 70‐88.

Thompson, S. and Wright, M. (1995), “Corporate governance: the role of restructuring transactions”, Economic Journal, Vol. 105, pp. 690‐703.

Van der Elst, C. (1997), “De remuneratie van de raad van bestuur van de BEL‐20 Vennootschappen”, Working Paper, Ghent University, Ghent.

Van der Elst, C. (1999), “Aandeelhoudersschap en aandeelhoudersstructuren”, in Corporate Governance: het Belgisch Perspectief, Instituut voor Bestuurders, Intersensia Rechtswetenschappen Antwerpen‐Groningen.

Van Hulle, C. (1997), “Is het systeem van corporate governance belangrijk? Op zoek naar de impact van verschillen in modellen”, report referaat Vlaams Wetenschappelijk Economisch Congres, pp. 287‐331.

Vincke, F. (1998), “The corporate governance debate in Belgium” in Klopt, K., Kanda, H., Roe, M.J., Wymeersch, E. and Prugge, S. (Eds), Comparative Corporate Governance, Oxford Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Walkling, R. and Long, M. (1984), “Agency theory, managerial welfare, and takeover bid resistance”, Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 15, pp. 54‐68.

Walsh, J.P. (1988), “Top management turnover following mergers and acquisitions”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 173‐83.

Warner, J.B., Watts, R.L. and Wruck, K.H. (1988a), “Stock prices and top management changes”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 20, pp. 461‐92.

Warner, J.B., Watts, R.L. and Wruck, K.H. (1988b), “Stock prices, event prediction, and event studies: an examination of top management restructerings”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 20, pp. 461‐92.

Weisbach, M. (1988), “Outside directors and CEO turnover”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 20, pp. 431‐60.

Wolfenzon, D. (1998), “A theory of pyramidal ownership”, Mimeo, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.

Yermack, D. (1996), “Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 40, pp. 185‐211.