Testing for Evidence of an X-Linked Genetic Basis for a Greater Proportion of Males with High Cognitive Ability
Tóm tắt
X-linked genetic differences between male and females have been posited to cause greater variance in cognitive ability in males. Males with only one X chromosome tend to express the genes on the X chromosome more fully than females, who express an “average” of their two X chromosomes due to X-inactivation. Greater variability in expression of genes on the X chromosome could account for greater variability in male cognitive ability. This would affect both the high and low ends of the cognitive ability distribution, but the possibility of high-end impact has drawn the most attention and controversy. The objective of this paper was to outline a method to test for empirical evidence that greater X-chromosomal variation in males is associated with greater variation in cognitive ability in males at the high end of the distribution. The method utilizes exogenous variation in the maternal X chromosome of twins to test the effect of sex on within-pair variation. We applied this method to g composite test scores at age 10 using data from the Twins Early Development Study. Twin-pair zygosity was used as an instrument reflecting whether twins had different maternal X chromosomes. We estimated differences in the association between variation in the maternal X chromosome in males and females and within-pair variation in test scores using a difference in differences specification of a linear regression model. We found no evidence supporting the proposition that the “averaging” effect of X-inactivation in females resulted in greater variation in male cognitive ability. There was evidence of differential selection for cognitive ability in the sample, however, indicating that the value of our study was primarily to introduce a novel method of addressing the question.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Christensen K, Peterson I, Skytthe S, Herskind AM, McGue M, Bingley P (2006) Comparison of academic performance of twins and singletons in adolescence: follow-up study. Br Med J 333:1095–1097
Craig IW, Haworth CMA, Plomin R (2009) Commentary on “A role for the X chromosome in sex differences in variability in general intelligence?’’ (Johnson et al. 2009). Perspect Psychol Sci 4:615–621
Deary IJ, Irwing P, Der G, Bates TC (2005a) Brother–sister differences in the g factor in intelligence: analysis of full, opposite-sex siblings from the NLSY1979. Intelligence 35:451–456
Deary IJ, Pattie A, Wilson V, Whalley LJ (2005b) The cognitive cost of being a twin: two whole-population surveys. Twin Res Hum Genet 8(4):376–383
Gelman A, Stern H (2006) The difference between “significant” and “not significant” is not itself statistically significant. Am Stat 60(4):328–331
Irwing P, Lynn R (2005) Sex differences in means and variability in the progressive matrices in university students: a meta analysis. Br J Psychol 96:505–524
Irwing P, Lynn R (2006) Intelligence: Is there a sex difference in IQ scores? Nature 442:E1–E2
Jensen A (1998) The g factor. Praeger, Westport
Johnson W, Carothers A, Deary IJ (2008) Sex differences in variability in general intelligence: a new look at the old question. Perspect Psychol Sci 3:518–531
Johnson W, Carothers A, Deary IJ (2009) A role for the X chromosome in sex differences in variability in general intelligence? Perspect Psychol Sci 4:598–611
Kovas Y, Haworth CMA, Dale PS, Plomin R (2007) The genetic and environmental origins of learning abilities and disabilities in the early school years. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 72(3):vii–144
Lynn R (1994) Sex differences in brain size and intelligence. A paradox resolved. Personal Indiv Differ 17:257–271
Lynn R, Irwing P (2004) Sex differences on the progressive matrices: a metaanalysis. Intelligence 32:481–498
Machin S, Pekkarinen T (2008) Global sex differences in test score variability. Science 322:1331–1332
Madhyastha TM, Hunt E, Deary IJ, Gale CR, Dykiert D (2009) Recruitment modeling applied to longitudinal studies of group differences in intelligence. Intelligence 37(4):422–427
Nieuwenhuis S, Forstmann BU, Wagenmakers E (2011) Erroneous analyses of interactions in neuroscience: a problem of significance. Nat Neurosci 14(9):1105–1107
Pearl J (2000) Causality: models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Raven JC, Court JH, Raven J (1996) Manual for raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Raymond FL (2007) X linked mental retardation: a clinical guide. J Med Genet 43:193–200
Skuse D (2005) X-linked genes and mental functioning. Human Mol Gen 14:R27–R32
Strand S, Deary IJ, Smith P (2006) Sex differences in cognitive abilities test scores: a UK national picture. Br J Educ Psychol 76:463–480
Wechsler D (1992) Wechsler intelligence scale for children, 3rd edn UK (WISC-III-UK) manual. The Psychological Corp, London