Testing a complete-diet model for estimating the land resource requirements of food consumption and agricultural carrying capacity: The New York State example

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems - Tập 22 Số 2 - Trang 145-153 - 2007
Christian J. Peters1, Jennifer L. Wilkins2, Gary W. Fick1
1(Cornell University
2Martha Van Rensselaer Hall, Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

Tóm tắt

AbstractAgriculture faces a multitude of challenges in the 21st century, and new tools are needed to help determine how it should respond. Among these challenges is a need to reconcile how human food consumption patterns should change to both improve human nutrition and reduce agriculture's environmental footprint. A complete-diet framework is needed for better understanding how diet influences demand for a fundamental agricultural resource, land. We tested such a model, measuring the impact of fat and meat consumption on the land requirements of food production in New York State (NYS). Analysis was confined to this geographic area to simplify the modeling procedure and to examine the state's ability to reduce environmental impact by supplying food locally. Per capita land resource requirements were calculated with a spreadsheet model for 42 diets ranging from 0 to 381 g d−1 (0 to 12 oz d−1) of meat and eggs and 20 to 45% total calories from fat. Many of these diets meet national dietary recommendations. The potential human carrying capacity of the NYS land base was then derived, based on recent estimates of available agricultural land. A nearly fivefold difference (0.18–0.86 ha) in per capita land requirements was observed across the diets. Increasing meat in the diet increased per capita land requirements, while increasing total dietary fat increased the land requirements of low meat diets but reduced the land needed for high meat diets. Higher meat diets used a larger share of the available cropland suited only to pasture and perennial crops. Thus, only a threefold difference was observed for the potential number of people fed from the NYS land base (2.0–6.2 million). In addition, some high-fat vegetarian diets supported fewer people than lower fat diets containing 63–127 g d−1 of meat (approximately one- to two-thirds of the national average per capita consumption in the US). These results support the assertion that diet should be considered in its entirety when assessing environmental impact. To more completely understand how diet influences land requirements and potential carrying capacity, this model should be applied across a larger geographic area that encompasses a wider variety of climates and soil resources. To better understand the ability of a local region to supply more of its own food, the model should be moved into a geospatial framework.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1073/pnas.96.11.5952

32 US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2001. Crop Production 2000 Summary. Available at Web site: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/field/pcp-bban/ (verified 23 November 2005).

10.1073/pnas.96.11.5908

10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00019-6

Reid, 1970, Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, 1

10.2527/1996.7461395x

10.1073/pnas.96.11.5929

29 US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 1992. Weights, measures, and conversion factors for agricultural commodities and their products. Agricultural Handbook No. 697. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.

10.5367/000000001101293427

24 US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 2005. Food consumption (per capita) data system: food pyramid servings. Available at Web site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/foodconsumption/FoodGuideIndex.htm (verified 27 November 2006).

31 New York Agricultural Statistics Service. 2004. New York Agricultural Statistics, 2003–04 Annual Bulletin. Available at Web site: http://www.nass.usda.gov/ny/Bulletin/2004/04-bulletin.htm (verified 23 November 2005).

Reijnders, 2003, Quantification of the environmental impact of different protein choices, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 78, 664S, 10.1093/ajcn/78.3.664S

10.2134/agronj2003.1424

10.1111/1467-8489.t01-1-00020

26 US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. 2004. US Department of Agriculture Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, Release 17. Available at Web site: http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp (verified 27 November 2006).

10.1073/pnas.96.11.5915

33 US Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2004. Crop Production 2003 Summary. Available at Web site: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/field/pcp-bban/ (verified 23 November 2005).

Bowman, 1998, The healthy eating index, 1994–96, Family Economics and Nutrition Review, 11, 2

10.1023/A:1021646131122

35 US Census Bureau. 2006. State and County QuickFacts. Available at Web site: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/index.html (verified 4 August 2006).

10.1007/s10806-004-5183-6

10.1038/nature01014

Pimentel, 2003, Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 78, 660S, 10.1093/ajcn/78.3.660S

3  Delgado C. , Rosegrant M. , Steinfeld H. , Ehui S. , and Courbois C. 1999. Livestock to 2020: the next food revolution. 2020 Vision for Food, Agriculture, and Environment. Discussion Paper 28. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.

23 US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs and US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. 2000. Food Commodity Intake Database, Version 2.1 [CD-ROM computer file]. National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA.

10.1007/s10584-005-5941-0

25 US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. 2004. Food consumption (per capita) data system: nutrient availability. Available at Web site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data/foodconsumption/NutrientAvailIndex.htm (verified 27 November 2006).

28  Matthews R.H. and Garrison Y.J. 1975. Food yields: summarized by different stages of preparation. Agricultural Handbook No. 102. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC.

Delgado, 2003, Rising consumption of meat and milk in developing countries has created a new food revolution, Journal of Nutrition, 133, 3907S, 10.1093/jn/133.11.3907S

10.2527/1996.7461406x

22 US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Health and Human Services. 2000. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 5th ed. Home and Garden Bulletin No. 232. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

30  Kantor L.S. 1998. A Dietary Assessment of the U.S. Food Supply (AER-772). US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC.

Pinstrup-Andersen, 2000, World food prospects, Agrarwirtschaft, 49, 311

34  Neter J. , Kutner M.H. , Nachtsheim C.J. , and Wasserman W. 1996. Applied Linear Statistical Models. 4th ed. WCB/McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

27  Peters C.J. , Wilkins J.L. , and Fick G.W. 2005. Input and Output Data in Studying the Impact of Meat and Fat on the Land Resource Requirements of the Human Diet and Potential Carrying Capacity: The New York State Example [R05-1]. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

10.2527/2001.793634x

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

Tập 22 Số 2

145-153

Thông tin tác giả