Temporal distance and motivation matter: Effects of psychological distance and left-digit in price evaluation
Tóm tắt
The aim of this article is to explore how the dimensions of psychological distance and motivation impact the left-digit effect in consumer price evaluation. The left-digit effect occurs when the leftmost digit of the prices being compared changes (e.g., $499 vs. $500); the difference between the prices is perceived as larger than if the leftmost digit does not change (e.g., $569 vs. $570). Furthermore, a nine-ending price may be perceived as larger than a price that is actually one dollar higher, when the motivation to process the price information is high and the psychological distance (temporal distance) is near. Likewise, when the motivation to process information is low, regardless of whether the temporal distance is near or far, consumers are also more likely to process information heuristically, strengthening the left-digit effect. However, when the motivation to deal with information is high and the temporal distance is distant, consumers are more likely to process information systematically which tends to diminish the perceived magnitude of the difference due to the left-digit effect.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bornemann, T., & Homburg, C. (2011). Psychological distance and the dual role of price. Journal of Consumer Research, 38, 490–504.
Braga, J. N., Ferreira, M. B., & Sherman, S. J. (2015). The effects of construal level on heuristic reasoning: The case of representativeness and availability. Decision, 2(3), 216–227.
Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic processing and the use of source vs. message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766.
Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). Guilford Press.
Chua, H. E., Boland, J. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 102(35), 12629–12633.
Dehaene, S. (1992). Varieties of numerical abilities. Cognition, 44, 1–42.
Dehaene, S. (1997). The Number Sense: how the mind creates mathematics, New York: Oxford.
Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 626–641.
Eyal, T., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1204–1209.
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition. McGraw-Hill.
Hinrichs, J. V., Yurko, D. S., & Hu, J. M. (1981). Two-digit number comparison: Use of place information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(4), 890–901.
Huang, N., Burtch, G., Hong, Y., & Polman, E. (2016). Effects of multiple psychological distances on construal and consumer evaluation: A field study of online reviews. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(4), 474–482.
Ji, L. J., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 943–955.
Kim, K., Zhang, M., & Li, X. (2008). Effects of temporal and social distance on consumer evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 706–713.
Kruglanski, A. W., & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay inferences: Effects of impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 448–468.
Labroo, A. A., & Patrick, V. M. (2008). Psychological distancing: Why happiness helps you see the big picture. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 800–809.
Lacetera, N., Pope, D. G., & Sydnor, J. R. (2012). Heuristic thinking and limited attention in the car market. American Economic Review, 102(5), 2206–2236.
Ledgerwood, A., Wakslak, C. J., & Wang, M. A. (2010). Differential information use for near and distant decisions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 638–642.
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Attitudes and Social Cognition, 75(1), 5–18.
Liberman, N., Sagristano, M. D., & Trope, Y. (2002). The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 523–534.
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal level theory and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 113–117.
Lin, C. H., & Wang, J. W. (2017). Distortion of price discount perceptions through the left-digit effect. Marketing Letters, 28(1), 99–112.
Manning, K. C., & Sprott, D. E. (2009). Price ending, left-digit effects, and choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 328–335.
Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R. E. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 922–934.
Miyazaki, A. D. (1993). How many shopping days until Christmas? A preliminary investigation of time pressures, deadlines, and planning levels on holiday gift purchases. Advances in Consumer Research, 20, 331–335.
Monroe, K. B., & Lee, A. Y. (1999). Remembering versus knowing: Issues in buyers’ processing of price information. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 27(2), 207–225.
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310.
Poltrock, S. E., & Schwartz, D. R. (1984). Comparative judgments of multidigit numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10(1), 32–45.
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1990). The role of attitudes in memory-based decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 614–622.
Schindler, R. (2009). Patterns of price endings used in US and Japanese price advertising. International Marketing Review, 26(1), 17–29.
Schindler, R. M., & Kirby, P. N. (1997). Patterns of rightmost digits used in advertised prices: Implications for nine-ending effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(2), 192–201.
Sokolova, T., Seenivasan, S., & Thomas, M. (2020). The left-digit bias: When and why are consumers penny wise and pound foolish? Journal of Marketing Research, 57(4), 771–788.
Stiving, M., & Winer, R. S. (1997). An empirical analysis of price endings with scanner data. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(1), 57–67.
Suri, R., & Monroe, K. B. (2003). The effects of time constraints on consumers’ judgments of prices and product. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 92–104.
Thomas, M., & Morwitz, V. (2005). Penny wise and pound foolish: The left-digit effect in price cognition. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 32, 54–64.
Thomas, M., & Morwitz, V. (2009). Heuristics in numerical cognition: Implications for pricing. Handbook of Pricing Research in Marketing, Vithala R. Rao ed., Edward Elgar Publishing, 132–149.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 876–889.
Tu, L. L., & Pullig, C. (2018). Penny wise and pound foolish? How thinking style affects price cognition. Marketing Letters, 29(2), 261–273.
Yan, D., & Sengupta, J. (2011). Effects of construal level on the price-quality relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(2), 376–389.