Teaching socioscientific issues: classroom culture and students’ performances

AAAS: (1989). Science for All Americans. Washington, D.C: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

AAAS: (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Aikenhead, G. S. (2004). The humanistic and cultural aspects of science & technology education. Paper presented at the 11th international organization for science and technology education (IOSTE) symposium, Lublin, Poland.

Aikenhead, G. (2005). Science education for everyday life: Evidence based practice. New York: Teachers College Press.

Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 269–287.

Allchin, D. (1999). Values in science: an educational perspective. Science & Education, 8, 1–12.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139–144.

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 8.

Cowie, B. (2005). Student commentary on classroom assessment in science: A sociocultural interpretation. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 199–214.

Dori, Y. J., & Herscovitz, O. (1999). Question posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: analysis of an environmental case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 411–430.

Dori, Y. J., Tal, R. T., & Tsaushu, M. (2003). Learning and assessing biotechnology topics through case studies with built-in dilemmas. Science Education, 87, 767–793.

Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39–72.

Ennis, R. H. (1987). A Taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J. Boykoff Baron, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice. (pp. 9–26) New York: W.␣H. Freeman and Company.

Harari, H. (1994). Tomorrow 98: Report of the superior committee on science, mathematics and technology education of Israel. Jerusalem: State of Israel, Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport.

Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science: Towards a personalized approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Hughes, G. (2000). Marginalization of socioscientific material in science-technology-society science curricula: Some implication for gender inclusivity and curriculum reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 426–440.

Keefer, M., & Ashley, K. D. (2001). Case-based approaches to professional ethics: A systematic comparison of students’ moral reasoning. Journal of Moral Education, 30, 377–398.

Lazarowitz, R., & Bloch, I. (2005). Awareness of societal issues among high school biology teachers teaching genetics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14, 437–457

Oulton, C., Dillon, J., & Grace, M. M. (2004). Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 411–423.

Poole, M. (1995). Beliefs and values in science education. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Resnick, L. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New-York: Oxford University Press.

Roth, W. M., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.

Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88, 263–291.

Roth, W. M., & Tobin, K. G. (2002). At the elbow of another: Learning to teach by coteaching. New York: Peter Lang.

Roth, W. M., Tobin, K., Zimmermann, A., Bryant, N., & Davis, C. (2002). Lessons on and from the dihybrid cross: An activity-theoretical study of learning in coteaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 253–282.

Solomon, J. (1993). Teaching science technology and society. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Tal, R. T. (2004). Community-based environmental education—a case study of teacher-parent collaboration. Environmental Education Research, 10, 523–543.

Tal, R. T. (2005). Implementing multiple assessment modes in an interdisciplinary environmental education course. Environmental Education Research, 11, 575–601.

Tal, R. T., & Hochberg, N. (2003). Reasoning, problem-solving and reflections: Participating in WISE project in Israel. Science Education International, 14, 3–19.

Tal, R. T., Dori, Y. J., Keiny, S., & Zoller, U. (2001). Assessing conceptual change of teachers involved in STES education and curriculum development—the STEMS project approach. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 247–261.

Tal, R. T., Dori, Y. J., & Lazarowitz, R. (2000). A project-based alternative assessment system. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26, 171–191.

Tishman, S., Perkins, D., & Jay, E. (1995). The thinking classroom. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Tobin, K. (2005). Building enacted science curricula on the capital of learners. Science Education, 89, 577–594.

Tobin, K., Capie, W., & Bettencourt, A. (1988). Active teaching for higher cognitive learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10, 17–27.

Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of an argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89, 357–377.

Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 145–181.

Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35–62.