Teachers’ writing proficiency and assessment ability: the missing link in teachers’ written corrective feedback practice in an Iranian EFL context
Tóm tắt
Teachers’ writing proficiency and writing assessment ability and their role in improving writing instruction in second language learning classrooms are issues that have not been investigated empirically and rigorously. To bridge the gap, we investigated the writing proficiency, writing assessment ability, and written corrective feedback beliefs and practices of Iranian English teachers who gave feedback on learners’ writings. To this end, 103 Iranian teachers who had the experience of writing instruction and assessment in their classrooms completed two writing tasks, assessed and gave feedback on two writing tasks, and responded to a researcher-made questionnaire inspecting their feedback beliefs and practices and research interest. The data analysis showed that the teachers’ writing proficiency did not satisfy the expectations and standards. Their writing assessment ability was also not accurate. Moreover, the data obtained from the questionnaire indicated that the teachers mostly gave unfocused direct written corrective feedback; they did not use technology in writing instruction; and most of them did not ask the learners to revise the texts which received feedback. Furthermore, the results showed that a majority of the teachers did not study the research papers because they did not have time and lacked access to the journals. As the findings of this study showed, more research is needed to improve the quality of writing instruction in Iranian classroom context. More research seems necessary especially in different contexts to come up with practical suggestions for teachers who give WCF on their students’ writing and assess and grade writing. These are critical issues that merit investigation in future research.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Amrhein, HR, & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written corrective feedback: what do students and teachers prefer and why? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 95–127.
Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102–118.
Bitchener, J. (2012a). A reflection on ‘the language learning potential’ of written CF. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 348–363.
Bitchener, J. (2012b). Written corrective feedback for L2 development: current knowledge and future research. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 855–867.
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: a review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109.
Canh, LV, & Renandya, WA. (2017). Teachers’ English proficiency and classroom language use: a conversation analysis study. RELC Journal, 48(1), 67–81.
Chambless, KS. (2012). Teachers’ oral proficiency in the target language: research on its role in the language teaching and learning. Foreign Language Annals, 45(s1), 141–162.
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267–296.
Coniam, D, & Falvey, P. (2013). Ten years on: the Hong Kong language proficiency assessment for teachers of English (LPATE). Language Testing, 30(1), 147–155.
Crusan, D, Plakans, L, Gebril, A. (2016). Writing assessment literacy: surveying second language teachers’ knowledge, beliefs, and practices. Assessing Writing, 28, 43–56.
Dempsey, MS, PytlikZillig, LM, Bruning, RH. (2009). Helping preservice teachers learn to assess writing: practice and feedback in a web-based environment. Assessing Writing, 14, 38–61.
Denny, SL. (2011). Seeing writing right and righting writing: an investigation into teacher writing proficiency. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(3), 221–234.
Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97–107.
Evans, NW, Hartshorn, KJ, McCollum, RM, Wolfersberger, M. (2010). Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 445–463.
Faez, F, & Karas, M. (2017). Connecting language proficiency to (self-reported) teaching ability: a review and analysis of research. RELC Journal, 48(1), 135–151.
Ferris, DR. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 33–53.
Ferris, DR. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 315–339.
Ferris, DR. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: a response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1–11.
Ferris, DR (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Ferris, DR (2003). Response to students writing: implications for second language students. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ferris, DR. (2004). The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: where are we, and where do we go from here? (and what do we do in the meantime….?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 49–62.
Ferris, DR. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 181–201.
Ferris, DR. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing studies. Language Teaching, 45(4), 446–459.
Ferris, DR. (2014). Responding to student writing: teachers’ philosophies and practices. Assessing Writing, 19, 6–23.
Ferris, DR. (2015). Written corrective feedback in L2 writing: Connors & Lunsford (1988); Lunsford & Lunsford (2008); Lalande (1982). Language Teaching, 48(4), 531–544.
Freeman, D. (2017). The case for teachers’ classroom English proficiency. RELC Journal, 48(1), 31–52.
Grant, L. (1997). Testing the language proficiency of bilingual teachers: Arizona’s Spanish proficiency test. Language Testing, 14(1), 23–46.
Gu, PY. (2016). Questionnaires in language teaching research. Language Teaching Research, 20(5), 567–570.
Hirvela, A, & Belcher, D. (2007). Writing scholars as teacher educators: exploring writing teacher education. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 125–128.
Hyland, K. (2013). Faculty feedback: perceptions and practices in L2 disciplinary writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 240–253.
Jodaie, M, & Farrokhi, F. (2012). An exploration of private language institute teachers: perceptions of written grammar feedback in EFL classes. English Language Teaching, 5(2), 58–67.
Junqueira, L, & Payant, C. (2015). “I just want to do it right, but it’s so hard”: a novice teacher’s written feedback beliefs and practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 19–36.
Kang, E, & Han, Z. (2015). The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: a meta-analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 1–18.
Lee, I. (2003). L2 writing teachers’ perspectives, practices and problems regarding error feedback. Assessing Writing, 8, 216–237.
Lee, I. (2008). Understanding teachers’ written feedback practices in Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 69–85.
Lee, I. (2009). Ten mismatches between teachers’ beliefs and written feedback practice. ELT Journal, 63(1), 13–22.
Lee, I. (2010). Writing teacher education and teacher learning: testimonies of four EFL teachers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 143–157.
Lee, I. (2013). Research into practice: written corrective feedback. Language Teaching, 46(1), 108–119.
Lee, I. (2014a). Ten myths about teaching and learning of writing in EFL contexts. Learn Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 7(special issue), 23–32.
Lee, I. (2014b). Revisiting teacher feedback in EFL writing from sociocultural perspectives. TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 201–213.
Lee, I. (2016). Teacher education on feedback in EFL writing: issues, challenges, and future directions. TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 518–527.
Lee, I, Mak, P, Burns, A. (2016). EFL teachers’ attempts at feedback innovation in the writing classroom. Language Teaching Research, 20(2), 248–269.
Li, J, & Barnard, R. (2011). Academic tutors’ beliefs about and practices of giving feedback on students; written assignments: a New Zealand case study. Assessing Writing, 16, 137–148.
Liu, Q, & Brown, D. (2015). Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 66–81.
Mahfoodh, OHA. (2017). “I feel disappointed”: EFL university students’ emotional responses towards teacher written feedback. Assessing Writing, 31, 53–72.
Marefat, F, & Heydari, M. (2016). Native and Iranian teachers’ perceptions and evaluation of Iranian students’ English essays. Assessing Writing, 27, 24–36.
McMartin-Miller, C. (2014). How much feedback is enough? : instructor practices and student attitudes toward error treatment in second language writing. Assessing Writing, 19, 24–35.
Montgomery, JL, & Baker, W. (2007). Teacher-written feedback: student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 82–99.
Murphy, S. (2000). A sociocultural perspective on teacher response: is there a student in the room? Assessing Writing, 7, 79–90.
Nakata, Y. (2010). Improving the classroom language proficiency of non-native teachers of English: what and how? RELC Journal, 41(1), 76–90.
Nassaji, H. (2012). The relationship between SLA research and language pedagogy: teachers’ perspectives. Language Teaching Research, 16(3), 337–365.
Nemati, M, Alavi, SM, Mohebbi, H, Panahi Masjedlou, A. (2017). Speaking out on behalf of the voiceless learners: written corrective feedback for English language learners in Iran. Issue in Educational Research, 27(4), 822–841.
Richards, JC. (2017). Introduction. RELC Journal, 48(1), 3–5.
Shin, SJ. (2006). Learning to teach writing through tutoring and journal writing. Teachers and Teaching, 12(3), 325–345.
Tavakoli, P. (2015). Connecting research and practice in TESOL: a community of practice perspective. RELC Journal, 46(1), 37–52.
Tavakoli, P, & Howard, MJ. (2012). Teaching English to speakers of other languages teachers’ views on the relationship between research and practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 229–242.
Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369.
Truscott, J. (1999). The case for “the case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes”: a response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(2), 111–122.
Truscott, J. (2001). Selecting errors for selective error correction. Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 27(2), 93–108.
Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: a response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 337–343.
Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 255–272.
Truscott, J. (2009). Arguments and appearances: a response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 59–60.
Truscott, J. (2010). Some thoughts on Anthony Bruton’s critique of the correction debate. System, 38, 329–335.
Tsang, A. (2017). EFL/ESL teachers’ general language proficiency and learners’ engagement. RELC Journal, 48(1), 99–113.
Valmori, L, & De Costa, PI. (2016). How do foreign language teachers maintain their proficiency? A grounded theory investigation. System, 57, 98–108.
Weigle, SC. (2007). Teaching writing teachers about assessment. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 194–209.
Zhou, AA, Busch, M, Cumming, A. (2014). Do adult ESL learners’ and their teachers’ goals for improving grammar in writing correspond? Language Awareness, 23(3), 234–254.