Teachers’ Attention to Curriculum Materials and Student Contexts: The Case of Korean Middle School Teachers
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Chung, J. Y. (2008). A study of an autonomous school policy: Rising issues and tasks for success. The Journal of Educational Administration, 26(2), 415–435.
Cohen, D. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 311–329.
Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (1998). State policy and classroom performance: Mathematics reform in California. CPRE Policy Brief (No. RB-23). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Donnelly, L. A., & Boone, W. J. (2007). Biology teachers’ attitudes toward and use of Indiana’s evolution standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 236–257.
Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1–26.
Floden, R. E., Porter, A. C., Schmidt, W. H., Freeman, D. J., & Schwille, W. H. (1981). Response to curriculum pressures: A policy-capturing study of teacher decisions about content. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(2), 129–141.
Freeman, D. J., & Porter, A. C. (1989). Do textbooks dictate the content of mathematics instruction in elementary schools? American Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 403–421.
Hong, H.-J. (2006). Paradiagm shift in curriculum development and quality control of Korean national curriculum standards. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(2), 183–206.
Kim, J. W. (2004). Education reform policies and classroom teaching in South Korea. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 14(2), 125–145.
Kim, S. (1997). The nature of ‘Curriculum 2000’ in consideration of our school curriculum after the rehabilitation. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 15(2), 171–198.
Knapp, M. S. (2003). Professional development as a policy pathway. Review of Research in Education, 27, 109–157.
Lee, B.-H., & Hong, H.-J. (2008). A critical review of the structure of Korea’s subject matters curriculum documents. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26(1), 27–58.
Park, C. (2003). A study on the rights for the organization of the curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(1), 98–110.
Remillard, J. T. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform. A framework for examining teachers’ curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 315–342.
Seo, K.-H. (2009). Teachers’ experiences of reconstructing national curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(3), 159–189.
Shin, K.-H. (2009). American teachers’ autonomy in curriculum and its implications for Korean education. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(3), 191–212.
Son, J.-W. (2008). Elementary teachers’ mathematics textbook use in terms of cognitive demands and influential factors: A mixed method study. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing.
Son, J.-W., & Choi, J. (2008). Elementary school teachers’ use of mathematics textbook: Cognitive demands and influential factors. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26(3), 155–189.
Sosniak, L. A., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1993). Teachers and textbooks: Materials use in four fourth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 93(3), 249–275.