Taxing commercial motor fuel in the European Union: the case for an apportionment-based, destination-principle system
Tóm tắt
Motor fuel is taxed by European Union member states where purchased. This article describes (a) the case for destination-based taxation of motor fuels, (b) economic distortions, incentives for destructive tax competition, and questionable division of tax base inherent in purchase-based taxation of commercial motor fuel, (c) loss of fiscal sovereignty inherent in minimum tax rates, imposed to alleviate the first two problems, and in uniform rates, (d) the apportionment-based system employed in the US and Canada and its advantages, (e) technology to determine distance traveled in each member state, and (f) legal and political obstacles to adopting an apportionment-based system.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Commission of the European Communities. (2001). COM(2001) 260 final, Tax policy in the European Union—priorities for the years ahead. A communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee.
Commission of the European Communities. (2002). COM(2002) 410 final, Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 92/81/EEC and Directive 92/82/EEC to introduce special tax arrangements for diesel fuel used for commercial purposes and to align the excise duties on petrol and diesel fuel.
Commission of the European Communities. (2006). Green paper on satellite navigation applications. COM(2006) yyy final.
Commission of the European Communities. (2007). COM(2007) 52 final, Proposal for a Council Directive amending Directive 2003/96/EC as regards the adjustment of special tax arrangements for gas oil used as motor fuel for commercial purposes and the coordination of taxation of unleaded petrol and gas oil used as motor fuel.
Evers, M. R., De Mooij, A., & Vollebergh, H. R. J. (2004). Tax competition under minimum rates: the case of European diesel excises. (CESifo Working Paper 1221).
Fullerton, D., & Gan, L. (2005). Cost effective policies to reduce vehicle emissions. American Economic Review, 95, 300–304.
International Road Transport Union. (2007). EC diesel duty proposal lacks political courage. Press release number 867, March 13.
Kanbur, R., & Keen, M. (1993). Jeux Sans Frontières: tax competition and tax coordination when countries differ in size. American Economic Review, 83, 877–892.
Lockwood, B., & Migali, G. (forthcoming). Did the single market cause competition in excise taxes? Evidence from EU countries. Economic Journal.
McKinnon, A. (2006). Government plans for lorry road-user charging in the UK: a critique and an alternative. Transport Policy, 20, 204–216.
McLure, C. E., Jr. (2008a). Rationalizing EU taxation of commercial motor fuel: harmonized rates versus apportionment—economic and legal issues. Bulletin for International Taxation, 62, 19–31.
McLure, C. E., Jr. (2008b). Rationalizing EU taxation of commercial motor fuel: harmonized rates versus apportionment—technological considerations. Bulletin for International Taxation, 62, 121–128.
McLure, C. E. Jr., Pitcher, R. C., & Turner, L. L. (2007). Taxation of commercial motor fuel in the US and Canada. Bulletin for International Taxation, 61, 541–549.
Newbery, D. (2005). Why tax energy? Towards a more rational policy. Energy Journal, 26, 1–39.
Parry, W. H., & Small, K. A. (2005). Does Britain or the United States have the right gasoline tax? American Economic Review, 95, 1276–1289.