Task conflict, relationship conflict and agreement‐seeking behavior in Chinese top management teams

Emerald - Tập 21 Số 1 - Trang 94-116 - 2010
SatyanarayanaParayitam1, Bradley J.Olson2, YongjianBao2
1Charlton College of Business, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth, Massachusetts, USA
2Faculty of Management, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada

Tóm tắt

PurposeThis paper aims to investigate the effects task conflict has on agreement seeking behavior and interpersonal conflict. In addition, it seeks to examine the moderating role of trust on the effects of agreement seeking behavior and interpersonal conflict on the styles of handing conflict, namely, avoidance, collaboration, and third party intervention.Design/methodology/approachUsing a structured survey instrument, this paper gathered data from 252 senior executives from Mainland China and analyzed these using the regression technique to see how interpersonal trust between executives moderates the relationship between conflict and conflict response mechanisms. The study also investigates the relationship between task and relationship conflict as well as agreement‐seeking behavior among Chinese executives in Mainland China.FindingsResults show that the presence of interpersonal trust among executives affects the conflict responses for the benefit of organization. The results show that task conflict in top management teams is positively related to relationship conflict and negatively related to agreement‐seeking behavior. The data support the view that intra‐group trust moderates the relationship between agreement‐seeking behavior and collaborating responses such that high‐trust groups will have greater collaboration than low‐trusting teams. Results also support that intra‐group trust moderates the relationship between agreement‐seeking behavior and third party responses such that high‐trust groups will have greater third‐party responses than low‐trusting teams.Research limitations/implicationsSelf‐report measures may have some inherent social desirability bias. Despite this potential weakness, this study examines Chinese executives and therefore provides insights into top management team literature.Practical implicationsThis study contributes to both practicing managers as well as to strategic management literature. This study suggests that administrators need to focus on interpersonal trust while dealing with the outcomes of task and relationship conflict.Originality/valueAlthough the study is related to Chinese executives, the findings from the study, that task conflict has its affect on interpersonal conflict and agreement‐seeking behavior, contribute to the strategic decision making literature.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aiken, L. and West, S. (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

Amason, A.C. (1996), “Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision‐making: resolving a paradox for top management teams”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 123‐48.

Ancona, D.G. and Caldwell, D.F. (1992), “Demography and design: predictions of new product team performance”, Organization Science, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 321‐41.

Ayoko, O.B., Hartel, C.E.J. and Callen, V.J. (2002), “Resolving the puzzle of productive and destructive conflict in culturally heterogeneous work groups: a communication – accommodation approach”, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 165‐95.

Barsade, S.G. (2002), “The ripple effect: emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 47 No. 4, pp. 644‐75.

Datta, K.D., Guthrie, J. and Wright, P. (2005), “Human resource management and labor productivity: does industry matter?”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 135‐45.

De Dreu, C. (2006), “When too little or too much hurts: evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams”, Journal of Management, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 83‐107.

De Dreu, C. and Weingart, L. (2003), “Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta‐analysis”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88 No. 4, pp. 741‐9.

De Dreu, C.K.W. and Van Vianen, A.E.M. (2001), “Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 309‐28.

Der Foo, M., Elfenbein, H.A., Hwee, H.T. and Chuan Aik, V. (2004), “Emotional intelligence and negotiation: the tension between creating and claiming value”, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 411‐29.

Desivilya, H.S. and Yagil, D. (2005), “The role of emotions in conflict management: the case of work teams”, The International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 55‐69.

Dooley, R.S., Fryxell, G.E. and Judge, W.Q. (2000), “Belaboring the non‐so‐obvious: consensus, commitment, and strategy implementation speed and success”, Journal of Management, Vol. 36 No. 6, pp. 1237‐57.

Eisenhardt, K. (1989), “Making fast decisions in high‐velocity environments”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 543‐76.

Eisenhardt, K. and Bourgeois, L. (1988), “Politics of strategic decision making in high velocity environments: towards a midrange theory”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 737‐70.

Fisher, C.D. (2000), “Mood and emotions while working: missing pieces of job satisfaction?”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 185‐202.

Forgas, J.P. (1998), “On feeling good and getting your way: mood effects on negotiator cognition and bargaining strategies”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 74 No. 3, pp. 565‐77.

Galbraith, J.R. (1973), Designing Complex Organizations, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

Gero, A. (1985), “Conflict avoidance in consensual decision processes”, Small Groups Behavior, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 487‐99.

Goll, I. and Rasheed, A.M.A. (1997), “Rational decision‐making and firm performance: the moderating role of environment”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18 No. 7, pp. 583‐91.

Hambrick, D.C. (1994), “Top management groups. A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the team label”, in Staw, B.M. and Cummings, L.L. (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 16, pp. 171‐213.

Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E. and Veenstra, C. (1999), “How task and person conflict shape the role of positive interdependence in management teams”, Journal of Management, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 117‐42.

Jehn, K. and Mannix, E. (2001), “The dynamic nature of conflict: a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 238‐51.

Jehn, K.A. (1995), “A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 256‐82.

Jehn, K.A. (1997), “Affective and cognitive conflicts in work groups: increasing performance through value‐based intragroup conflict”, in de Dreu, C.K.W. and Van de Vliert, E. (Eds), Using Conflict in Organizations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 87‐100.

Knight, D., Pearce, C.L., Smith, K.G., Olian, J.D., Sims, H.P., Smith, K.A. and Flood, P. (1999), “Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 445‐65.

Langfred, C. (2004), “Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self‐managing teams”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47 No. 3, pp. 385‐99.

Lawrence, B.S. (1997), “The black box of organizational demography”, Organization Science, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 1‐22.

McAllister, D.J. (1995), “Affect‐ and cognition‐based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 24‐59.

McGrath, J.E. (1984), Groups: Interaction and Performance, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

McGrath, J. (1997), “Small group research: that once and future field: an interpretation of the past with an eye to the future”, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, Vol. 1, pp. 7‐27.

Mackenzie, K.D. (1999), “The inequality between two distributions: applications to the analysis of diversity data”, Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 45‐65.

Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H. and Schoorman, F.D. (1995), “An integrative model of organizational trust”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 709‐34.

Miller, D. and Friesen, P.H. (1982), “Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: two models of strategic momentum”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 1‐25.

Miller, C.C., Burke, L. and Glick, W. (1998), “Cognitive diversity among upper‐echelon executives: implications for strategic decision processes”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 39‐58.

Milliken, F. and Martins, L. (1996), “Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 402‐33.

Mintzbert, H., Raiginshani, D. and Theoret, A. (1976), “The structure of unstructured decision process”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 21, pp. 246‐75.

Olson, B.J., Bao, Y. and Parayitam, S. (2007), “Strategic decision making within Chinese firms: the effects of cognitive diversity and trust on decision outcomes”, Journal of World Business, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 35‐46.

Parayitam, S. and Dooley, R.S. (2007), “The relationship between conflict and decision outcomes: the moderating role of affect‐and cognition‐based trust in strategic decision making teams”, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 42‐73.

Pelled, L.H., Eisenhardt, K.M. and Xin, K.P. (1999), “Exploring the black box: an analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 1‐28.

Pfeffer, J. (1981), Power in Organizations, Pitman, Marshfield, MA.

Podsakoff, P.M., Ahearne, M. and MacKenzie, S.B. (1997), “Organizational citizenship behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82 No. 2, pp. 262‐70.

Putnam, L.L. and Wilson, C. (1982), “Communication strategies in organizational conflict: reliability and validity of a measurement scale”, in Burgoon, M. (Ed.), Communication Yearbook, Vol. 6, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 629‐52.

Rahim, M.A. (1983), “A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 368‐76.

Shaw, M.E. (1981), Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior, 3rd ed., McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.

Simons, T.L. and Peterson, R.S. (2000), “Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 85 No. 1, pp. 102‐11.

Stone, E.F. and Hollenbeck, J.R. (1989), “Clarifying some controversial issues surrounding statistical procedures for detecting moderator variables: empirical evidence and related matters”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 74 No. 1, pp. 3‐10.

Tajfel, H. (1982), “Social psychology of intergroup relations”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 33, pp. 1‐39.

Tjosvold, D. (1997), “Conflict within interdependence: its value for productivity and individuality”, in De Dreu, C.K.W. and Van de Vliert, E. (Eds), Using Conflict in Organizations, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 23‐37.

Tsui, A., Ashford, S., Clair, L. and Xin, K. (1995), “Dealing with discrepant expectations: response strategies and managerial effectiveness”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 6, pp. 1515‐43.

Turner, J.C. (1982), “Toward a cognitive definition of the group”, in Tajfel, H. (Ed.), Social Identity and Intergroup Relations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

West, M.A. and Anderson, N.R. (1996), “Innovation in top management teams”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 81 No. 6, pp. 680‐93.

Zand, D.E. (1972), “Trust and managerial problem solving”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 17, pp. 229‐39.

Zimbardo, P.G. and Leippe, R. (1992), The Psychology of Attitude Change and Social Influence, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.

Bigley, G.A. and Pearce, J.L. (1998), “Straining for shared meaning in organization science: problems of trust and distrust”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 405‐21.

Cyert, R.M. and March, J.G. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Deutsch, M. (1973), The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Process, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

Dirks, K.T. and Ferrom, D.L. (2001), “The role of trust in organizational settings”, Organization Science, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 450‐67.

Dooley, R.S. and Fryxell, G.E. (1999), “Attaining decision quality and commitment from dissent: the moderating effects of loyalty and competence in strategic decision‐making teams”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42 No. 4, pp. 389‐402.

Flood, P.C., Fong, C.M., Smith, K.G., O'Regan, P.P., Moore, S. and Morley, M. (1992), “Top management teams and pioneering: a resource based view”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 291‐306.

Fredrickson, J.W. (1984), “The comprehensiveness of strategic decision processes: extension, observations, and future directions”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 445‐66.

Gambetta, D. (1988), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, Basil Blackwell, New York, NY.

Gimeno, J., Hoskisson, R.E., Beal, B.D. and Wan, W.P. (2005), “Explaining the clustering of international expansion moves: a critical test in the US Telecommunications industry”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 297‐319.

Hofstede, G. (1993), “Cultural constraints in management theories”, Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 81‐94.

Holmes, J.G. (1991), “Trust and the appraisal process in close relationships”, in Jones, W.H. and Perlman, D. (Eds), Advances in Personal Relationships, Vol. 2, Jessica Kingsley, London, pp. 57‐104.

Janis, I.L. (1982), Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascos, 2nd ed., Houghton Miffin Company, Boston, MA.

Johnson‐George, C. and Swap, W.C. (1982), “The measurement of specific interpersonal trust: construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 34 No. 6, pp. 1306‐17.

Katz, R. (1982), “The effects of group longevity on project communication an performance”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 81‐104.

Katzenback, J. (1997), “The myth of the top management team”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 75 No. 6, pp. 82‐91.

Kennedy, P. (1985), A Guide to Econometrics, 2nd ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Olson, B.J., Parayitam, S. and Bao, Y. (2007), “Strategic decision making: the effects of cognitive diversity, conflict and trust and decision outcomes”, Journal of Management, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 196‐222.

Pelled, L.H. (1996), “Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: an intervening process theory”, Organization Science, Vol. 7 No. 6, pp. 615‐31.

Pelled, L.H. and Adler, P.S. (1994), “Antecedents of intergroup conflict in multifunctional product development teams: a conceptual model”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 41 No. 1, pp. 21‐8.

Rahim, M.A. (1982), “Measurement of organizational conflict”, Journal of General Psychology, Vol. 109, pp. 189‐99.

Schweiger, D.M., Sandberg, W.R. and Rechner, P. (1989), “Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy and consensus approaches to strategic decision making”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 745‐72.

Secord, P.F. and Backman, C.W. (1974), Social Psychology, 2nd ed., McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.

Smith, K.G., Smith, K.A., O'Bannon, D.P., Olian, J.D., Sims, H.P. and Scully, J. (1994), “Top management team demography and process: the role of social integration and communication”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 39 No. 3, pp. 412‐38.

Stephan, W.G. and Stephan, C.W. (1985), “Intergroup anxiety”, Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 41, pp. 157‐75.

Van de Vliert, E. and Euwema, M. (1994), “Agreeableness and activeness as components of conflict behaviors”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 66, pp. 674‐87.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 21 Số 1

94-116

Thông tin tác giả