Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas

Science Education - Tập 86 Số 3 - Trang 343-367 - 2002
Dana L. Zeidler1, Kimberly A. Walker1, Wayne A. Ackett1, Michael L. Simmons1
1Department of Secondary Education, College of Education, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between students' conceptions of the nature of science and their reactions to evidence that challenged their beliefs about socioscientific issues. This study involved 41 pairs of students representing “critical cases” of contrasting ethical viewpoints. These 82 students were identified from a larger sample of 248 students from 9th and 10th grade general science classes, 11th and 12th grade honors biology, honors science, and physics classes, and upper‐level college preservice science education classes. Students responded to questions aimed at revealing their epistemological views of the nature of science and their belief convictions on a selected socioscientific issue. The smaller subset of students was selected based on varying degrees of belief convictions about the socioscientific issues and the selected students were then paired to discuss their reasoning related to the issue while being exposed to anomalous data and information from each other and in response to epistemological probes of an interviewer. Taxonomic categories of students' conceptions of the nature of science were derived from the researchers' analysis of student responses to interviews and questionnaires. In some instances, students' conceptions of the nature of science were reflected in their reasoning on a moral and ethical issue. This study stimulated students to reflect on their own beliefs and defend their opinions. The findings suggest that the reactions of students to anomalous socioscientific data are varied and complex, with notable differences in the reasoning processes of high school students compared to college students. A deeper understanding of how students reason about the moral and ethical context of controversial socioscientific issues will allow science educators to incorporate teaching strategies aimed at developing students' reasoning skills in these crucial areas. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 86:343–367, 2002; Published online in Wiley Interscience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/sce.10025

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199807)82:4<417::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-E

Abd‐El‐Khalick F. &Lederman N. G.(1998).Improving science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A critical review of the literature. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching San Diego CA.

10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1057::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-C

Aikenhead G., 2000, Improving science education: The contribution of research

10.1002/sce.3730690403

American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1993, Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061

American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1989, Science for all Americans

10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<563::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-N

Bell R. L. Lederman N. G. &Abd‐El‐Khalick F.(1998).Preservice teachers' beliefs and practices regarding the teaching of the nature of science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching San Diego CA.

Brinckerhoff R. F., 1992, Values in school science: A teacher's handbook

10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<623::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-O

10.3102/00346543063001001

Council of Ministers of Education Canada (CMEC) Pan Canadian Science Project(1997). Common framework of science learning outcomes: K‐12. [On‐line]. Available:http://www.qscc.qld.edu.au/kla.sose.publications.html.

Driver R., 1996, Young people's images of science

10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A

Eisner E. W., 1991, The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhacement of educational practice

Gee J. P., 1998, Review of research in education, 119

10.7208/chicago/9780226292038.001.0001

Glaser B. G., 1967, The discovery of grounded theory

10.4159/harvard.9780674063426

Hazen R. M., 1991, Science matters

Huberman A. M., 1994, Handbook of qualitative research, 428

10.1002/sce.1011

10.1017/CBO9780511571350

10.17763/haer.62.2.9r424r0113t670l1

Kuhn T. S., 1970, The structure of scientific revolutions

10.1017/CBO9780511621123

Latour B., 1987, Science in action

Laudan L., 1977, Progress and its problems: Towards a theory of scientific development

10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199910)36:8<916::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-A

10.1002/sce.3730740207

10.1002/sce.3730710509

10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<296::AID-TEA1007>3.0.CO;2-R

10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

McComas W. F., 2000, The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies, 3

10.2307/4449872

Millar R., 1998, Beyond 2000: Science education for the future

Mosher R., 1994, Preparing for citizenship: Teaching youth to live democratically

National Research Council. (1996).National science education standards.Washington DC:National Academic Press.

10.1016/0740-5472(94)90044-2

10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17471.x

Pitman M. A., 1992, The handbook of qualitative research in education, 729

Queensland School Curriculum Council (QSCC)(2001). Studies of society and environment. [On‐line]. Available:http://www.cmec.ca/science/framework/index.htm.

10.1002/sce.3730770210

10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199902)36:2<201::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-H

Scheffler I., 1987, Value theory and education, 122

10.1080/0950069920140406

10.1002/tea.3660280905

Spradley J. P., 1979, The ethnographic interview

Woods P., 1992, The handbook of qualitative research in education, 337

Zeidler D. L., 1997, The central role of fallacious thinking in science education, Science Educator, 7, 38

10.1002/tea.3660260903

10.1002/sce.3730760407

10.1002/tea.3660210102