TURBIDITY SUSPENI)ED SEDIMENT, AND WATER CLARITY: A REVIEW1

Journal of the American Water Resources Association - Tập 37 Số 5 - Trang 1085-1101 - 2001
Robert J. Davies‐Colley1,2, David G. Smith1,2
1New York Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Water Supply, 465 Columbus Avenue, Valhalla, New York 10595 (E-Mail/Davies-Colley: [email protected]).
2Respectively, National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd. (NIWA), P.O. Box 11–115, Hamilton, New Zealand

Tóm tắt

ABSTRACT: Suspended sediment causes a range of environmental damage, including benthic smothering, irritation of fish gills, and transport of sorbed contaminants. Much of the impact, while sediment remains suspended, is related to its light attenuation, which reduces visual range in water and light availability for photosynthesis. Thus measurement of the optical attributes of suspended matter in many instances is more relevant than measurement of its mass concentration. Nephelometric turbidity, an index of light scattering by suspended particles, has been widely used as a simple, cheap, instrumental surrogate for suspended sediment, that also relates more directly than mass concentration to optical effects of suspended matter. However, turbidity is only a relative measure of scattering (versus arbitrary standards) that has no intrinsic environmental relevance until calibrated to a ‘proper’ scientific quantity. Visual clarity (measured as Secchi or black disc visibility) is a preferred optical quantity with immediate environmental relevance to aesthetics, contact recreation, and fish habitat. Contrary to common perception, visual clarity measurement is not particularly subjective and is more precise than turbidity measurement. Black disc visibility is inter‐convertible with beam attenuation, a fundamental optical quantity that can be monitored continuously by beam transmissometry. Visual clarity or beam attenuation should supplant nephelometric turbidity in many water quality applications, including environmental standards.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1007/s002650050330

APHA, 1998, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater

ASTM, 1996, 1996 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 11

AWWA, 1990, Water Quality and Treatment. A Handbook of Community Water Supplies, 1194

Austin R. W. 1973.Problems in Measuring Turbidity as a Water Quality Parameter. U.S. EPA Seminar on Methodology for Monitoring the Marine Environment. October 16–18 1973 Seattle Washington.

Biggs B. J. B., 1998, Stream Monitoring Manual. New Zealand Stream Health Monitoring and Assessment Kit (SHMAK) Version 1

Clark E. H., 1985, Eroding Soils, 252

10.4319/lo.1988.33.4.0616

10.1080/00288330.1990.9516430

10.1007/BF00006149

Davies‐Colley R. J., 1992, Offsite Measurement of the Visual Clarity of Waters, Water Resources Bulletin, 28, 1

10.1080/00288330.1995.9516658

10.1111/j.1752-1688.1988.tb03054.x

Davies‐Colley R. J., 1993, Colour and Clarity of Natural Waters, 310

Duntley S. Q., 1962, The Sea, 452

10.1364/JOSA.53.000214

10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1988)114:6(1436)

10.1029/JC083iC01p00501

10.1080/10641260091129198

Hydrolab A, 1997, Transmissivity. Hydrolab Technical Note No. 206–4/97 Hydrolab

Kilroy C.andB. J. F.Biggs 2001.Use of the SHMAK Clarity Tube for Measuring Water Clarity: Comparison with the Black Disc Method.New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research(submitted).

10.1007/BF00045935

Kirk J. T. O., 1988, Optical Water Quality–What Does It Mean and How Should We Measure It, Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 60, 194

Kirk J. T. O., 1994, Light and Photosynthesis in Aquatic Ecosystems, 509, 10.1017/CBO9780511623370

Lerman A., 1979, Geochemical Processes. Water and Sediment Environments, 481

10.1577/1548-8659(1987)7<18:EOTIFW>2.0.CO;2

Lythgoe J. N., 1979, The Ecology of Vision, 244

10.1016/0302-3524(74)90019-X

McCluney W. R., 1975, Radiometry of Water Turbidity Measurement, Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation, 47, 252

McGirr D. J., 1974, Turbidity and Filterable and Non‐filterable Residue. Interlaboratory Quality Control Study No. 10, 9

MFE (Ministry for the Environment, 1994, Guidelines for the Management of Water Colour and Clarity. Water Quality Guidelines No. 2, 77

10.1016/0043-1354(95)00087-2

10.4319/lo.1986.31.5.0909

10.1080/07438140109353977

10.1016/S0301-4797(91)80030-9

10.1080/00288330.1995.9516637

10.1080/00288330.1995.9516638

10.1016/S0301-4797(05)80136-7

10.1111/j.1752-1688.1997.tb03511.x

10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb04205.x

10.1111/j.1752-1688.1990.tb01411.x

Sovell L. S.Heiskary andJ.Anderson 2000.Using the Transparency Tube in Minnesota's New Citizen Stream‐Monitoring Program.Proceedings of the National Water Quality Monitoring Council Conference April 25–27 2000 Austin Texas pp.481–493.

Steel E. A.andS.Neuhausser 2001.A Comparison of Methods for Measuring Visual Water Clarity.Journal of the North American Benthological Society(submitted).

Stumm W., 1981, Aquatic Chemistry, 780

Telesnicki G. J., 1995, Comparison of Turbidity Measurement by Nephelometry and Transmissometry and Its Relevance to Water Quality Standards, Bulletin of Marine Science, 57, 540

Tessier A., 1992, Environmental Particles, 425

10.4319/lo.1968.13.1.0001

US EPA 1999.Guidance Manual for Compliance with the Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule. Turbidity Provisions. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water.

Hulst H. C., 1957, Light Scattering by Small Particles, 470

Olphen H., 1977, An Introduction to Clay Colloid Chemistry, 318

10.1139/f99-071

10.1007/BF00015500