THE INFLUENCE OF UPWARD FEEDBACK ON SELF‐ AND FOLLOWER RATINGS OF LEADERSHIP

Personnel Psychology - Tập 48 Số 1 - Trang 35-59 - 1995
Leanne Atwater1, Paul Roush2, ALLISON FISCHTHAL3
1School of Management, Arizona State University West
2Department of Leadership and Law U.S. Naval Academy
3School of Management, State University of New York at Binghamton#TAB#

Tóm tắt

The impact of upward feedback (followers' perceptions of leadership provided to leaders) on leaders' self‐evaluations and followers' subsequent ratings of leadership was assessed in a field setting. Subjects were 978 student leaders and their 1,232 followers. Results indicated that overall, leaders' behaviors as rated by followers improved after feedback. Leaders' self‐evaluations following feedback became more similar to the evaluations provided by followers. Interestingly, when leaders were grouped according to whether feedback was positive, neutral, or negative based on agreement between self‐ and follower ratings, differences between groups in post‐feedback self‐evaluations and follower ratings emerged. Self‐evaluations for leaders receiving negative feedback (high self‐ relative to followers' ratings) went down, while self‐evaluations for leaders receiving positive feedback (low self‐ relative to follower's ratings) went up. Follower ratings of leaders who received negative feedback improved following feedback to leaders, while there was no change in follower ratings for those receiving positive feedback. Implications for using upward feedback in organizations are discussed.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ashford S., 1989, Self‐assessments in organizations: A literature review and integrative model, Research in Organizational Behavior, 11, 33

10.1016/0030-5073(83)90156-3

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00848.x

10.1111/j.1464-0597.1991.tb01002.x

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1989.tb00662.x

10.1002/hrm.3930320209

10.1016/0030-5073(82)90221-5

10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.606

10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.527

Flocco R., 1969, An examination of the leader behavior of school business administrators, Dissertation Abstracts International, 30, 84

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00645.x

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00631.x

10.1037/h0037507

10.1037/0021-9010.63.5.579

10.1037/0021-9010.64.4.349

10.1016/0030-5073(80)90039-2

Kay E, 1965, Effects of threat in a performance appraisal interview, Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 405

Kaplan R., 1990, Character shifts: The challenge of improving executive performance through personal growth, 10.35613/ccl.1990.1094

10.1016/0749-5978(86)90037-3

Latham G., 1989, Training and development in work organizations: Frontiers of industrial and organizational psychology

10.1002/hrm.3930320211

10.1037/0021-9010.67.3.280

10.1177/014920638601200408

PrueD FairbankJ.(1981)Performance feedback in organizational behavior management: A review.Journal of Organizational Behavior Management 1–16.

10.1111/j.2044-8325.1986.tb00233.x

10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.549

10.1177/014920638401000311

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1984.tb00525.x

Taylor M, 1984, Individuals' reactions to performance feedback in organizations: A control theory perspective, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 2, 81

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1980.tb02348.x

10.1002/hrm.3930320203

10.1037/h0026022

Velsor E, 1991, Enhancing self‐objectivity and performance on‐the‐job: The developmental impact of feedback

VanVelsorE TaylorS LeslieJ.(1992 August).Self/rater agreement self‐awareness and leadership effectiveness. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association Washington DC.

10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60252-X

10.1002/hrm.3930320204