THE EFFECTS OF JOB STEREOTYPE, APPLICANT GENDER, AND COMMUNICATION STYLE ON RATINGS IN SCREENING INTERVIEWS

Emerald - Tập 11 Số 1 - Trang 67-84 - 2003
Judith L.Juodvalkis1, Beth A.Grefe1, MaryHogue1, Daniel J.Svyantek2, WilliamDeLamarter3
1The University of Akron
2The University of Akron Daniel J. Svyantek, Psychology Department, University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325–4301, FAX: (330) 972–5174. E‐mail: [email protected]
3Allegheny College,

Tóm tắt

This paper investigated the interactions between gender stereotypes for jobs, applicant gender, and the communication styles used by male and female applicants during an interview. This study was conducted as a laboratory experiment, utilizing a 2x2x2 mixed design. Subjects read one job description and heard three audiotapes of all male or all female job applicants exhibiting a dominant, submissive, or neutral communication style. The subjects then rated the applicant on five dimensions. These dimensions are likeability, competence, sociability, overall impression, and hireability. Results showed significant interactions of applicant gender and communication style on four of the five dimensions rated in this study. An inspection of the dimension means revealed different effects for gender‐appropriate and gender‐inappropriate behavior for males and females. Males were penalized on ratings of overall impression and hireability for communicating in stereotypically gender‐inappropriate manners. Females were penalized on ratings of sociability and likeability for communicating in a stereotypically gender‐inappropriate fashion. The implications of these findings for using interviews are then discussed in terms of aversive genderism.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb02373.x

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1982.tb02197.x

10.1080/00224545.1994.9712194

10.1002/j.2161-1920.1988.tb00909.x

Auster E. R., 1989, Academy of Management Review, 14, 173, 10.5465/amr.1989.4282082

10.1111/0022-4537.00237

10.1006/jrpe.2001.2347

10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.828

10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.871

10.1007/BF01545034

Cascio W. F., 1991, Applied psychology in personnel management

10.1007/BF00288200

Eagly A., 1987, Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation

10.1016/S0263-2373(98)00024-3

10.1037/0022-3514.38.4.618

10.1002/ert.3910180412

Gaertner S. L., 1986, J. F. Dovidio & S

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00941.x

Gardner D. H., 1988, Sex effects in evaluating applicant qualifications: A reexaminatioa Sex Roles, 18, 297-308

Glick P., 1991, Sex Roles, 18, 297

10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.178

Heilman M. E., 1995, Stereotypes and their effects in the workplace: What we know and what we don't know.- Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 3-26

10.1111/0022-4537.00234

Hewitt D. Y., 1992, ARMA Records Management Quarterly, 26, 26

10.1002/j.2161-1920.1985.tb00364.x

10.2307/2112699

10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.821

10.1177/105960118801300111

10.1080/00909889609365449

10.1177/0146167285113005

10.1037/0021-9010.69.4.557

10.1037/0021-9010.72.4.596

10.1111/0022-4537.00235

10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199601)17:1<33::AID-JOB778>3.0.CO;2-F

10.1007/BF00290006

10.1037/0021-9010.74.6.971

10.1002/casp.2450050403

10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00985.x

10.1111/j.2044-8325.1985.tb00206.x

10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.341