THE CORE SELF‐EVALUATIONS SCALE: DEVELOPMENT OF A MEASURE

Personnel Psychology - Tập 56 Số 2 - Trang 303-331 - 2003
Timothy A. Judge1, Amir Erez1, Joyce E. Bono2, Carl J. Thoresen3
1Department of Management, University of Florida
2Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota
3Department of Psychology, Tulane University;

Tóm tắt

Despite an emerging body of research on a personality trait termed core self‐evaluations, the trait continues to be measured indirectly. The present study reported the results of a series of studies that developed and tested the validity of the Core Self‐Evaluations Scale (CSES), a direct and relatively brief measure of the trait. Results indicated that the 12‐item CSES was reliable, displayed a unitary factor structure, correlated significantly with job satisfaction, job performance, and life satisfaction, and had validity equal to that of an optimal weighting of the 4 specific core traits (self‐esteem, generalized self‐efficacy, neuroti‐cism, and locus of control), and incremental validity over the 5‐factor model. Overall, results suggest that the CSES is a valid measure that should prove useful in applied psychology research.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1080/0144341940140306

10.1027//1015-5759.16.1.31

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x

10.1016/B978-012134645-4/50027-5

10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729

10.1016/0001-8791(78)90058-1

10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50008-3

10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305

10.1002/9781118619179

10.1037/h0055617

10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.139

10.1037/h0048255

10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.141

10.1177/109442810141004

Cohen J, 1983, Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences

10.1016/0191-8869(84)90133-8

Costa PT, 1992, NEO‐PI‐R and NEO‐FFI professional manual

10.1037/h0040957

Darlington RB., 1990, Regression and linear models

10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276

10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1270

Eysenck HJ., 1990, Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 244

Eysenck HJ, Eysenck SBG, 1968, Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory

Goldberg LR., 1999, Personality psychology in Europe, 7

10.1177/0146167297235001

Harter S., 1990, Competence considered, 67

10.1016/0001-8791(84)90069-1

10.1037/10434-013

10.1111/j.2044-8295.1983.tb01855.x

10.1016/0191-8869(96)00067-0

10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.753

10.1016/0006-3223(96)84228-4

10.1037/10434-004

10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80

10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.237

10.1080/08959285.1998.9668030

Judge TA, 1997, The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach, Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151

10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.17

10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.107

10.1016/0001-8791(81)90060-9

10.2307/259060

10.1016/B978-0-12-590241-0.50013-7

10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.853

10.1016/B978-0-12-443201-7.50006-3

Locke EA, 1996, Self‐esteem and work, International Review of Industrial/Organizational Psychology, 11, 1

10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.81

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb01562.x

Motowidlo SJ, 1994, Evidence that task performance should be distin–quished from contextual performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 475, 10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.475

10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.272

Pedhazur EJ, 1991, Measurement, design, and analysis: An integrated approach

10.2307/256437

10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02765.x

10.1037/h0092976

10.1192/bjp.166.6.813

Schwab DP., 1980, Construct validity in organizational behavior, Research in Organizational Behavior, 2, 3

10.1111/j.2044-8325.1988.tb00470.x

10.1111/j.2044-8325.1984.tb00145.x

10.1037/0021-9010.86.4.621

10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.557

Watson D., 2000, Mood and temperament

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Personnel Psychology

Tập 56 Số 2

303-331

Thông tin tác giả