Systems analysis of an acarine predator-prey system. I

Chant, D. A. (1959) Phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) Part I. Bionomics of seven species in southeastern England. Part II. A taxonomic review of the Phytoseiidae, with description of 38 new species.Can. Ent. 91 (Suppl. 12): 1–166. Flaherty, D. L. andC. B. Huffaker (1970) Biological control of Pacific mites and Willamette mites in San Joaquin Valley vineyards I. Role ofMetaseiulus occidentalis.Hilgardia 40: 267–308. Huffaker, C. B. (1958) Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations.Hilgardia 27: 343–83. Huffaker, C. B., M. van de Vrie andJ. A. McMurtry (1970) Ecology of tetranychid mites and their natural enemies: A review. II. Tetranychid populations and their possible control by predators: An evaluation.Hilgardia 40: 391–458. Maynard Smith, J. (1974)Models in Ecology. 146p. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Murdoch, W. W. andA. Oaten (1975) Predation and population stability.Adv. Ecol. Res. 9: 2–131. Osakabe, M. (1967) Biological studies on the tea red spider mite,Tetranychus kanzawai Kishida, in tea plantation.Bull. Tea Res. Stat. Japan 4: 36–156. (In Japanese with an English summary) Rosenzweig, M. L. (1971) Paradox of enrichment: destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time.Science 171: 385–7. Takafuji, A. (1977) The effect of the rate of successful dispersal of a phytoseiid mite,Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on the persistence in the interactive system between the predator and its prey.Res. Popul. Ecol. 18: 210–22. Takafuji, A. andD. A. Chant (1976) Comparative studies of two species of predacious phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae), with special reference to their responses to the density of their prey.Res. Popul. Ecol. 17: 255–310.