Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive techniques for the management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis

Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences - Tập 21 Số 12 - Trang 896-901 - 2014
Vinayak Nagaraja1, Guy D. Eslick1, Michael R. Cox1
1The Whiteley-Martin Research Centre; Discipline of Surgery; The University of Sydney Nepean Hospital; Level 5, South Block, P.O. Box 63 Penrith NSW 2751 Australia

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Martin, 2006, Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub2

Velanovich, 2006, Analysis of the SAGES outcomes initiative cholecystectomy registry, Surg Endosc, 20, 43, 10.1007/s00464-005-0378-0

Ebner, 2004, Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones, Surg Endosc, 18, 762, 10.1007/s00464-003-9029-5

Vezakis, 2000, Intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Surg Endosc, 14, 1118, 10.1007/s004640000076

Petelin, 2003, Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration, Surg Endosc, 17, 1705, 10.1007/s00464-002-8917-4

Bansal, 2010, A prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and common bile duct stones, Surg Endosc, 24, 1986, 10.1007/s00464-010-0891-7

Rojas-Ortega, 2003, Transcystic common bile duct exploration in the management of patients with choledocholithiasis, J Gastrointest Surg, 7, 492, 10.1016/S1091-255X(03)00026-X

Martin, 1998, Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration: a methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures, Ann Surg, 228, 29, 10.1097/00000658-199807000-00005

Nathanson, 2005, Postoperative ERCP versus laparoscopic choledochotomy for clearance of selected bile duct calculi: a randomized trial, Ann Surg, 242, 188, 10.1097/01.sla.0000171035.57236.d7

Shojaiefard, 2009, Various techniques for the surgical treatment of common bile duct stones: a meta review, Gastroenterol Res Pract, 2009, 840208, 10.1155/2009/840208

Hanif, 2010, Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct exploration: the treatment of first choice for common bile duct stones, Surg Endosc, 24, 1552, 10.1007/s00464-009-0809-4

Moher, 2009, Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement, J Clin Epidemiol, 62, 1006, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005

DerSimonian, 1986, Meta-analysis in clinical trials, Control Clin Trials, 7, 177, 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2

Higgins, 2003, Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses, BMJ, 327, 557, 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557

Egger, 1997, Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test, BMJ, 315, 629, 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

Orwin, 1983, A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis, J Educ Stat, 8, 157, 10.2307/1164923

ElGeidie, 2011, Preoperative versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for management of common bile duct stones, Surg Endosc, 25, 1230, 10.1007/s00464-010-1348-8

Lella, 2006, Use of the laparoscopic-endoscopic approach, the so-called “rendezvous” technique, in cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a valid method in cases with patient-related risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis, Surg Endosc, 20, 419, 10.1007/s00464-005-0356-6

Morino, 2006, Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus laparoendoscopic rendezvous in patients with gallbladder and bile duct stones, Ann Surg, 244, 889, 10.1097/01.sla.0000246913.74870.fc

Rábago, 2006, Two-stage treatment with preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) compared with single-stage treatment with intraoperative ERCP for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis with possible choledocholithiasis, Endoscopy, 38, 779, 10.1055/s-2006-944617

Tzovaras, 2012, Laparoendoscopic rendezvous versus preoperative ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis: interim analysis of a controlled randomized trial, Ann Surg, 255, 435, 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182456ec0

Rhodes, 1998, Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones, Lancet, 351, 159, 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09175-7

Rogers, 2010, Prospective randomized trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for common bile duct stone disease, Arch Surg, 145, 28, 10.1001/archsurg.2009.226

Cuschieri, 1999, E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi, Surg Endosc, 13, 952, 10.1007/s004649901145

Sgourakis, 2002, Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and cholecystectomy versus endoscopic stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis. A prospective randomized study, Minerva Chir, 57, 467

Noble, 2009, A randomized, clinical trial to compare endoscopic sphincterotomy and subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with primary laparoscopic bile duct exploration during cholecystectomy in higher risk patients with choledocholithiasis, J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 19, 713, 10.1089/lap.2008.0428

Koc, 2013, Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: a prospective randomized study, Am J Surg, 206, 457, 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.02.004

Hong, 2006, Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct for cholecystocholedocholithiasis, Surg Endosc, 20, 424, 10.1007/s00464-004-8248-8

ElGeidie, 2011, Laparoscopic exploration versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial, Dig Surg, 28, 424, 10.1159/000331470

Cotton, 1991, Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus, Gastrointest Endosc, 37, 383, 10.1016/S0016-5107(91)70740-2

Martin, 2002, Laparoscopic transcystic bile duct stenting in the management of common bile duct stones, ANZ J Surg, 72, 258, 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2002.02368.x

Dasari, 2013, Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 10.1002/14651858.CD003327.pub3