Systematic LC‐MS/MS bioanalytical method development that incorporates plasma phospholipids risk avoidance, usage of incurred sample and well thought‐out chromatography
Tóm tắt
This treatise summarizes the underlying principle and the road map for systematic LC‐MS/MS bioanalytical method development. The three themes that have recently emerged as central to building quality during method development—phospholipids, incurred sample and sound chromatographic considerations—are the main focus of this article. In order to reduce the bioanalytical risk associated with plasma phospholipids, a dual approach involving extraction and chromatography is recommended. The use of incurred sample during method development is essential to avoid interference arising from drug‐related components. This is different from the current practice of incurred sample reanalysis, which tests reproducibility during method application. LC column/mobile phase optimization is needed to achieve appropriate peak shape, sensitivity and the separation of the analyte from interfering metabolites and phospholipids. Related to sound chromatographic considerations, we lay out facts and myths related to UPLC, vis‐à‐vis HPLC. Incorporation of quality during method development avoids the costly experience of finding out by chance about the invalidity of a method after it has been used in support of a number of pivotal clinical and non‐clinical studies. To this end, we put forth an outline of a protocol for a systematic LC‐MS/MS bioanalytical method development. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
AhnoffM WurzerA LindmarkBandJussilaR.Characterisation of serum albumin and lysoPCs as major contributors to plasma sample matrix effects on electrospray ionisation efficiency.51st ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry Montreal Canada 2003.
AurandC TrinhA BrAndesHK BellDSandYeM.Increased bioanalytical throughput using selective phospholipid depletion.57th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry Philadelphia PA 2009.
BennettPKandVan HorneKC.Identification of the major endogenous and persistent compounds in plasma serum and tissue that cause matrix effects with electrospray LC/MS techniques.American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists Annual Meeting and Exposition Salt Lake City UT 2003.
BergeronM LahaieM FurtadoMandGarofoloF.Selection of buffer additives for liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) procedure to remove matrix effect due to phospholipids in LC‐MS/MS.57th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry Philadelphia PA 2009.
Food and Drug Administration, 2001, Guidance for Industry: Bioanalytical Method Validation, 1
GarofoloF MessJ‐CandCoteCS.Guidelines for method development of HILIC‐LC‐MS/MS: choice of columns and chromatographic conditions to handle matrix effect due tphopholipids.American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists Annual Meeting and Exposition Atlanta GA 2008.
Jemal M, 2005, Identification and Quantification of Drugs, Metabolites and Metabolizing Enzymes by LC‐MS
Lehninger AL, 1982, Principles of Biochemistry, 707
LiuG SnappHM JiQandArnoldME.Method Development of a UPLC Assay for the Bioanalysis of Ketoconazole in Human Plasma.57th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry Philadelphia PA 2009.
Neue UD, 1997, HPLC columns: Theory, Technology, and Practice, 58
OuyangZ JemalMandShenX.Does LC column type/brand affect LC/MS response?53th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry San Antonio TX 2005.
OuyangZ WuSandJemalM.Biological sample phospholipids clean up: A comparison of sample preparation techniques.57th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry Philadelphia PA 2009.
SchoenerDandMurakamiS.The use of liquid–liquid extraction along with colloidal silica and polyvalent cations to remove phospholipids that produce ESI matrix effects.57th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry Philadelphia PA 2009.
Schwarz HP, 1977, Phospholipid composition of blood plasma, erythrocytes, and ‘ghosts’ in sickle cell disease, Clinical Chemistry, 23, 1548, 10.1093/clinchem/23.9.1548
Van HorneKCandBennettPK.Preventing matrix effects by using new sorbents to remove phospholipids from biological samples.American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists Annual Meeting and Exposition Salt Lake City Utah 2003.
WilliamsL LindenmuthM JonesR DesbrowC CaulfieldJ DowthwaiteG CalverleyR JordanSandLodderH.Phospholipid removal: a comparison between traditional liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) and supported liquid extraction (SLE) using LC‐MS/MS analysis.57th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry Philadelphia PA 2009.
XiaY‐QandJemalM.Evaluation of UHPLC column efficiency at different flow rates and retention factors: implications of the not‐so‐expected results.56th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry Denver CO 2008.
XiaY‐Q OuyangZandJemalM.Automated column/mobile phase screening system to achieve optimum chromatographic separation and sensitivity during LC‐MS/MS bioanalytical method development.54th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry Seattle WA 2006b.
YongB HudsonW JonesDandChenY‐L.A simple way to remove phospholipids from bioanalytical samples.57th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry Philadelphia PA 2009.