Synaptic alterations in visual cortex reshape contrast-dependent gamma oscillations and inhibition-excitation ratio in a genetic mouse model of migraine
Tóm tắt
Migraine affects a significant fraction of the world population, yet its etiology is not completely understood. In vitro results highlighted thalamocortical and intra-cortical glutamatergic synaptic gain-of-function associated with a monogenic form of migraine (familial-hemiplegic-migraine-type-1: FHM1). However, how these alterations reverberate on cortical activity remains unclear. As altered responsivity to visual stimuli and abnormal processing of visual sensory information are common hallmarks of migraine, herein we investigated the effects of FHM1-driven synaptic alterations in the visual cortex of awake mice. We recorded extracellular field potentials from the primary visual cortex (V1) of head-fixed awake FHM1 knock-in (n = 12) and wild type (n = 12) mice in response to square-wave gratings with different visual contrasts. Additionally, we reproduced in silico the obtained experimental results with a novel spiking neurons network model of mouse V1, by implementing in the model both the synaptic alterations characterizing the FHM1 genetic mouse model adopted. FHM1 mice displayed similar amplitude but slower temporal evolution of visual evoked potentials. Visual contrast stimuli induced a lower increase of multi-unit activity in FHM1 mice, while the amount of information content about contrast level remained, however, similar to WT. Spectral analysis of the local field potentials revealed an increase in the β/low γ range of WT mice following the abrupt reversal of contrast gratings. Such frequency range transitioned to the high γ range in FHM1 mice. Despite this change in the encoding channel, these oscillations preserved the amount of information conveyed about visual contrast. The computational model showed how these network effects may arise from a combination of changes in thalamocortical and intra-cortical synaptic transmission, with the former inducing a lower cortical activity and the latter inducing the higher frequencies ɣ oscillations. Contrast-driven ɣ modulation in V1 activity occurs at a much higher frequency in FHM1. This is likely to play a role in the altered processing of visual information. Computational studies suggest that this shift is specifically due to enhanced cortical excitatory transmission. Our network model can help to shed light on the relationship between cellular and network levels of migraine neural alterations.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Stovner LJ, Hagen K, Linde M, Steiner TJ (2022) The global prevalence of headache: an update, with analysis of the influences of methodological factors on prevalence estimates. J Headache Pain 23(1):34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01402-2
Goadsby PJ, Holland PR, Martins-Oliveira M, Hoffmann J, Schankin C, Akerman S (2017) Pathophysiology of migraine: a disorder of sensory processing. Physiol Rev 97(2):553–622. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00034.2015
Pietrobon D, Moskowitz MA (2013) Pathophysiology of migraine. Annu Rev Physiol 75(1):365–391. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183717
Battista J, Badcock DR, McKendrick AM (2011) Migraine increases Centre-surround suppression for drifting visual stimuli. PLoS One 6(4):e18211. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018211
Nguyen BN, McKendrick AM, Vingrys AJ (2016) Abnormal inhibition-excitation imbalance in migraine. Cephalalgia 36(1):5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102415576725
Vecchia D, Pietrobon D (2012) Migraine: a disorder of brain excitatory–inhibitory balance? Trends Neurosci 35(8):507–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2012.04.007
Aurora S, Wilkinson F (2007) The brain is Hyperexcitable in migraine. Cephalalgia 27(12):1442–1453. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01502.x
Coppola G, Pierelli F, Schoenen J (2007) Is the cerebral cortex Hyperexcitable or Hyperresponsive in migraine? Cephalalgia 27(12):1427–1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01500.x
Cosentino G, Fierro B, Brighina F (2014) From different neurophysiological methods to conflicting pathophysiological views in migraine: a critical review of literature. Clin Neurophysiol 125(9):1721–1730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2014.05.005
Pietrobon D, Brennan KC (2019) Genetic mouse models of migraine. J Headache Pain 20(1):79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-1029-5
Haan J, Kors EE, Vanmolkot KRJ, Maagdenberg AMJM, Frants RR, Ferrari MD (2005) Migraine genetics: an update. Curr Sci Inc 9(3):213–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-005-0065-9
van den Maagdenberg AMJM et al (2004) A Cacna1a Knockin migraine mouse model with increased susceptibility to cortical spreading depression. Neuron 41(5):701–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00085-6
Pietrobon D (2013) Calcium channels and migraine. Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1828(7):1655–1665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.11.012
Tottene A et al (2002) Familial hemiplegic migraine mutations increase Ca2+ influx through single human CaV2.1 channels and decrease maximal CaV2.1 current density in neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(20):13284–13289. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.192242399
Tottene A et al (2009) Enhanced excitatory transmission at cortical synapses as the basis for facilitated spreading depression in CaV2.1 Knockin migraine mice. Neuron 61(5):762–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.027
Tottene A, Favero M, Pietrobon D (2019) Enhanced Thalamocortical Synaptic Transmission and Dysregulation of the Excitatory–Inhibitory Balance at the Thalamocortical Feedforward Inhibitory Microcircuit in a Genetic Mouse Model of Migraine. J Neurosci 39(49):9841–9851. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1840-19.2019
Vecchia D, Tottene A, van den Maagdenberg AMJM, Pietrobon D (2014) Mechanism underlying unaltered cortical inhibitory synaptic transmission in contrast with enhanced excitatory transmission in CaV2.1 knockin migraine mice. Neurobiol Dis 69:225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2014.05.035
Meneghetti N, Cerri C, Tantillo E, Vannini E, Caleo M, Mazzoni A (2021) Narrow and broad gamma bands process complementary visual information in mouse primary visual cortex. eNeuro ENEURO.0106–21.2021. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0106-21.2021
Ko H, Hofer SB, Pichler B, Buchanan KA, Sjöström PJ, Mrsic-Flogel TD (2011) Functional specificity of local synaptic connections in neocortical networks. Nature 473(7345):87–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09880
Tantillo E et al (2020) Differential roles of pyramidal and fast-spiking, GABAergic neurons in the control of glioma cell proliferation. Neurobiol Dis 141:104942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2020.104942
Bruyns-Haylett M et al (2017) The neurogenesis of P1 and N1: a concurrent EEG/LFP study. NeuroImage 146:575–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.034
Freeman JA, Nicholson C (1975) Experimental optimization of current source-density technique for anuran cerebellum. J Neurophysiol 38(2):369–382. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1975.38.2.369
Haberly LB, Shepherd GM (1973) Current-density analysis of summed evoked potentials in opossum prepyriform cortex. J Neurophysiol 36(4):789–802. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1973.36.4.789
Pettersen KH, Devor A, Ulbert I, Dale AM, Einevoll GT (2006) Current-source density estimation based on inversion of electrostatic forward solution: effects of finite extent of neuronal activity and conductivity discontinuities. J Neurosci Methods 154(1–2):116–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.12.005
Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27(3):379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
Magri C, Whittingstall K, Singh V, Logothetis NK, Panzeri S (2009) A toolbox for the fast information analysis of multiple-site LFP, EEG and spike train recordings. BMC Neurosci 10(1):81. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-81
Panzeri S, Treves A (1996) Analytical estimates of limited sampling biases in different information measures. Netw Comput Neural Syst 7(1):87–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954898X.1996.11978656
Cohen MX (2014) Analyzing neural time series data: theory and practice. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Cavallari S, Panzeri S, Mazzoni A (2014) Comparison of the dynamics of neural interactions between current-based and conductance-based integrate-and-fire recurrent networks. Front Neural Circuits 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2014.00012
Mazzoni A, Panzeri S, Logothetis NK, Brunel N (2008) Encoding of naturalistic stimuli by local field potential spectra in networks of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. PLoS Comput Biol 4(12):e1000239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000239
Mazzoni A, Whittingstall K, Brunel N, Logothetis NK, Panzeri S (2010) Understanding the relationships between spike rate and delta/gamma frequency bands of LFPs and EEGs using a local cortical network model. NeuroImage 52(3):956–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.040
Mazzoni A, Brunel N, Cavallari S, Logothetis NK, Panzeri S (2011) Cortical dynamics during naturalistic sensory stimulations: experiments and models. J Physiol-Paris 105(1–3):2–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2011.07.014
Tuckwell HC (1988) Introduction to theoretical neurobiology, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511623202
Braitenberg V, Schüz A (1991) Anatomy of the cortex, 18. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02728-8
Holmgren C, Harkany T, Svennenfors B, Zilberter Y (2003) Pyramidal cell communication within local networks in layer 2/3 of rat neocortex. J Physiol 551(1):139–153. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2003.044784
Sjöström PJ, Turrigiano GG, Nelson SB (2001) Rate, timing, and cooperativity jointly determine cortical synaptic plasticity. Neuron 32(6):1149–1164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00542-6
Brunel N, Wang X-J (2003) What determines the frequency of fast network oscillations with irregular neural discharges? I. synaptic dynamics and excitation-inhibition balance. J Neurophysiol 90(1):415–430. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01095.2002
Bartos M, Vida I, Frotscher M, Geiger JRP, Jonas P (2001) Rapid signaling at inhibitory synapses in a dentate gyrus interneuron network. J Neurosci 21(8):2687–2698. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-08-02687.2001
Bartos M et al (2002) Fast synaptic inhibition promotes synchronized gamma oscillations in hippocampal interneuron networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(20):13222–13227. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.192233099
Gupta A (2000) Organizing principles for a diversity of GABAergic interneurons and synapses in the neocortex. Science 287(5451):273–278. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5451.273
Markram H, Lübke J, Frotscher M, Roth A, Sakmann B (1997) Physiology and anatomy of synaptic connections between thick tufted pyramidal neurones in the developing rat neocortex. J Physiol 500(2):409–440. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp022031
Angulo MC, Rossier J, Audinat E (1999) Postsynaptic glutamate receptors and integrative properties of fast-spiking interneurons in the rat neocortex. J Neurophysiol 82(3):1295–1302. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1999.82.3.1295
Kraushaar U, Jonas P (2000) Efficacy and stability of quantal GABA release at a hippocampal interneuron-principal neuron synapse. J Neurosci 20(15):5594–5607
Xiang Z, Huguenard JR, Prince DA (1998) GABA A receptor-mediated currents in interneurons and pyramidal cells of rat visual cortex. J Physiol 506(3):715–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.715bv.x
Zhou F-M, Hablitz JJ (1998) AMPA receptor-mediated EPSCs in rat neocortical layer II/III interneurons have rapid kinetics. Brain Res 780(1):166–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(97)01311-5
Saleem AB et al (2017) Subcortical source and modulation of the narrowband gamma oscillation in mouse visual cortex. Neuron 93(2):315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.028
Mazzoni A, Lindén H, Cuntz H, Lansner A, Panzeri S, Einevoll GT (2015) Computing the local field potential (LFP) from integrate-and-fire network models. PLoS Comput Biol 11(12):e1004584. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004584
Hansel D, Mato G, Meunier C, Neltner L (1998) On numerical simulations of integrate-and-fire neural networks. Neural Comput 10(2):467–483. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976698300017845
Shelley MJ, Tao L (2001) Efficient and accurate time-stepping schemes for integrate-and-fire neuronal networks. J Comput Neurosci 11(2):111–119. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012885314187
Goodman D (2008) Brian: a simulator for spiking neural networks in Python. Front Neuroinform 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.11.005.2008
Stimberg M, Brette R, Goodman DF (2019) Brian 2, an intuitive and efficient neural simulator. eLife 8:e47314. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47314
Theiler J, Eubank S, Longtin A, Galdrikian B, Doyne Farmer J (1992) Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 58(1–4):77–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(92)90102-S
Ji X, Zingg B, Mesik L, Xiao Z, Zhang LI, Tao HW (2016) Thalamocortical innervation pattern in mouse auditory and visual cortex: laminar and cell-type specificity. Cereb Cortex 26(6):2612–2625. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv099
Di Russo F, Martínez A, Sereno MI, Pitzalis S, Hillyard SA (2002) Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential: cortical sources of VEP. Hum Brain Mapp 15(2):95–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.10010
Liao W, Gandal MJ, Ehrlichman RS, Siegel SJ, Carlson GC (2012) MeCP2+/− mouse model of RTT reproduces auditory phenotypes associated with Rett syndrome and replicate select EEG endophenotypes of autism spectrum disorder. Neurobiol Dis 46(1):88–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2011.12.048
Ridder WH, Nusinowitz S (2006) The visual evoked potential in the mouse—origins and response characteristics. Vis Res 46(6–7):902–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2005.09.006
Timme NM, C. Lapish (2018) A Tutorial for Information Theory in Neuroscience eNeuro 5:3. ENEURO.0052–18.2018. https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0052-18.2018
Adesnik H (2017) Synaptic mechanisms of feature coding in the visual cortex of awake mice. Neuron 95(5):1147–1159.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.08.014
Brennan KC, Pietrobon D (2018) A systems neuroscience approach to migraine. Neuron 97(5):1004–1021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.029
Younis S, Hougaard A, Noseda R, Ashina M (2019) Current understanding of thalamic structure and function in migraine. Cephalalgia 39(13):1675–1682. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102418791595
Gielen S, Krupa M, Zeitler M (2010) Gamma oscillations as a mechanism for selective information transmission. Biol Cybern 103(2):151–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-010-0390-x
Harris KD, Csicsvari J, Hirase H, Dragoi G, Buzsáki G (2003) Organization of cell assemblies in the hippocampus. Nature 424(6948):552–556. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01834
Vick M, Womelsdorf T, Fries, Pascal (2013) Gamma-Band Synchronization and Information Transmission. in Principles of Neural Coding. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 449–462
Pritchett DL, Siegle JH, Deister CA, Moore CI (2015) For things needing your attention: the role of neocortical gamma in sensory perception. Curr Opin Neurobiol 31:254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2015.02.004
Mulleners WM, Chronicle EP, Palmer JE, Koehler PJ, Vredeveld J-W (2001) Visual cortex excitability in migraine with and without Aura. Headache 41(6):565–572. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-4610.2001.041006565.x
Puledda F, Ffytche D, O’Daly O, Goadsby PJ (2019) Imaging the visual network in the migraine Spectrum. Front Neurol 10:1325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01325
Pietrobon D, Moskowitz MA (2014) Chaos and commotion in the wake of cortical spreading depression and spreading depolarizations. Nat Rev Neurosci 15(6):379–393. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3770
Parker PD et al (2021) Non-canonical glutamate signaling in a genetic model of migraine with aura. Neuron 109(4):611–628.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.11.018
Crivellaro G et al (2021) Specific activation of GluN1-N2B NMDA receptors underlies facilitation of cortical spreading depression in a genetic mouse model of migraine with reduced astrocytic glutamate clearance. Neurobiol Dis 156:105419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105419
Henrie JA, Shapley R (2005) LFP power spectra in V1 cortex: the graded effect of stimulus contrast. J Neurophysiol 94(1):479–490. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00919.2004
Brunel N, Hakim V (1999) Fast global oscillations in networks of integrate-and-fire neurons with low firing rates. Neural Comput 11(7):1621–1671. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976699300016179
Perenboom MJL, Schenke M, Ferrari MD, Terwindt GM, den Maagdenberg AMJM, Tolner EA (2021) Responsivity to light in familial hemiplegic migraine type 1 mutant mice reveals frequency-dependent enhancement of visual network excitability. Eur J Neurosci 53(5):1672–1686. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15041
Han C, Shapley R, Xing D (2021) Gamma rhythms in the visual cortex: functions and mechanisms. Cogn Neurodyn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-021-09767-x
Niell CM, Stryker MP (2010) Modulation of visual responses by behavioral state in mouse visual cortex. Neuron 65(4):472–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.01.033
Belitski A et al (2008) Low-frequency local field potentials and spikes in primary visual cortex convey independent visual information. J Neurosci 28(22):5696–5709. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0009-08.2008
Pietrobon D (2018) Ion channels in migraine disorders. Curr Opin Physiol 2:98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cophys.2018.02.001
Tremblay R, Lee S, Rudy B (2016) GABAergic interneurons in the neocortex: from cellular properties to circuits. Neuron 91(2):260–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.033
Marchionni I, Pilati N, Forli A, Sessolo M, Tottene A, Pietrobon D (2022) Enhanced Feedback Inhibition Due to Increased Recruitment of Somatostatin-Expressing Interneurons and Enhanced Cortical Recurrent Excitation in a Genetic Mouse Model of Migraine. J Neurosci JN-RM-0228-22. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0228-22.2022
Billeh YN et al. (2020) Systematic Integration of Structural and Functional Data into Multi-scale Models of Mouse Primary Visual Cortex. Neuron S0896627320300672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2020.01.040
Campagnola L et al. (2022) Local connectivity and synaptic dynamics in mouse and human neocortex. Science 375(6585):eabj5861. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj5861