Sustainable transition of the Republic of Serbia: measuring capacity for circularity in agriculture and rural areas
Tóm tắt
The Republic of Serbia (RS) is strategically oriented towards sustainable development, but the implementation thereof faces different limitations and problems. RS emits substantial pollution caused by fossil fuels, and pollution from agricultural sector characterized by inefficient use of energy and intensive use of fertilizers. Bearing in mind the significant agricultural capacities and the orientation towards rural development, a special green transformation must be implemented in this domain. Taking into account the specificities and tradition, the introduction of the circularity concept can be considered the most acceptable. Research on readiness for transition to circularity in RS rural areas has not been conducted; therefore, the goal of the paper is to develop a concept for assessing the capacity of rural areas for circularity. This study is the first scientific proposal that aims to provide input for policymakers, thus contributing to the creation of a new identity of RS, whose development is based on the principles of sustainability. The study was conducted as conceptual research, with the objective of examining an undiscovered phenomenon without empirical evidence and incorporating the targeted phenomenon into a conceptual framework, while providing a proposal for a solution model based on an interdisciplinary approach—the application of qualitative and quantitative methods (aggregation of composite indicators and Delphi method). Paper results can be summarized as follows: (a) qualitative analysis of policy framework related to RS transition towards circularity (which shows that regulation is insufficient or non-existent, so conceptual research at this stage is necessary and only possible); (b) research questionnaire; (c) original set of indicators for measuring capacity for circularity (derived from the questionnaire); (d) concept of index of capacity of agriculture and rural areas for circularity (based on a set of indicators); and (e) concept of the monitoring of circularity implementation. The main research findings presented in this paper could be beneficial for countries at early stages of introducing circularity, having both low and high agricultural potential. With slight modifications, they can also be applied to other economic activities.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Gaffney J, Bing J, Byrne PF, Cassman KG, Ciampitti I, Delmer D, Habben J, Lafitte HR, Lidstrom UE, Porter DO, Sawyer JE (2019) Science-based intensive agriculture: sustainability, food security, and the role of technology. Glob Food Sec 23:236–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.08.003
Pawlak K, Kołodziejczak M (2020) The role of agriculture in ensuring food security in developing countries: considerations in the context of the problem of sustainable food production. Sustainability 12:5488. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135488
Gajić A, Krunić N, Protić B (2021) Classification of rural areas in Serbia: framework and implications for spatial planning. Sustainability 13:1596. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041596
Stojanović V, Pantelić M, Savić S (2022) Environmental issues in Serbia: pollution and nature conservation. In: Manić E, Nikitović V, Djurović P (eds) The geography of Serbia. World Regional Geography Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74701-5_20
Baldos ULC, Fuglie KO, Hertel TW (2020) The research cost of adapting agriculture to climate change: a global analysis to 2050. Agric Econ 51(2):207–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12550
Prosekov AY, Ivanova SA (2018) Food security: the challenge of the present. Geoforum 91:73–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.02.030
Arora NK (2019) Impact of climate change on agriculture production and its sustainable solutions. Environ Sustain 2(2):95–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-019-00078-w
Bathaei A, Štreimikienė DA (2023) Systematic review of agricultural sustainability indicators. Agriculture 13:241. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020241
Schlör H, Schubert SA (2022) SDG 8 and the food–energy–water nexus: a two-country dynamic computable general equilibrium CGE model. Energ Sustain Soc 12:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-022-00369-x
Seid A, Andualem B (2021) The role of green biotechnology through genetic engineering for climate change mitigation and adaptation, and for food security: current challenges and future perspectives. J Adv Biol Biotechnol 24(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.9734/jabb/2021/v24i130192
Rosa L, Rulli MC, Ali S, Chiarelli DD, Dell’Angelo J, Mueller ND, Scheidel A, Siciliano G, D’Odorico P (2021) Energy implications of the 21st century agrarian transition. Nat Commun 12(1):2319. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-22581-7
Prăvălie R, Patriche C, Borrelli P, Panagos P, Roșca B, Dumitraşcu M, Nita IA, Săvulescu I, Birsan MV, Bandoc G (2021) Arable lands under the pressure of multiple land degradation processes. A global perspective. Environ Res 194:110697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110697
Kuik O, Reynès F, Delobel F, Bernardi M (2011) “FAO-MOSAICC: the FAO Modelling System for Agricultural Impacts of Climate Change to support decision-making in adaptation. Conference papers 332121, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
Vazhenina L, Magaril E, Mayburov I (2023) Digital management of resource efficiency of fuel and energy companies in a circular economy. Energies 16:3498. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083498
Malhi GS, Kaur M, Kaushik P (2021) Impact of climate change on agriculture and its mitigation strategies: a review. Sustainability 13:1318. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031318
Yang M, Chen L, Wang J, Msigwa G, Osman AI, Fawzy S, Rooney DW, Yap PS (2023) Circular economy strategies for combating climate change and other environmental issues. Environ Chem Lett 21:55–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01499-6
Knez S, Štrbac S, Podbregar I (2022) Climate change in the Western Balkans and EU Green Deal: status, mitigation and challenges. Energ Sustain Soc 12:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-021-00328-y
Velasco-Muñoz JF, Mendoza JMF, Aznar-Sánchez JA, Gallego-Schmid A (2021) Circular economy implementation in the agricultural sector: definition, strategies and indicators. Resour Conser Recycl 170:105618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105618
Castro CG, Trevisan AH, Pigosso DCA, Mascarencas J (2022) The rebound effect of circular economy: definitions, mechanisms and a research agenda. J Clean Prod 345:131136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131136
Kullmann F, Markewitz P, Stolten D, Robinius M (2021) Combining the worlds of energy systems and material flow analysis: a review. Energ Sustain Soc 11:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-021-00289-2
van Langen SK, Vassillo C, Ghisellini P, Restaino D, Passaro R, Ulgiati (2021) Promoting circular economy transition: a study about perceptions and awareness by different stakeholders’ groups. J Clean Prod 316:128166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128166
Ashton WS, Fratini CF, Isenhour C, Krueger R (2022) Justice, equity, and the circular economy: introduction to the special double issue. Local Environ 27:10–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2022.2118247
European Commission (2020) A new Circular Economy Action Plan For a cleaner and more competitive Europe, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1583933814386&uri=COM:2020:98:FIN
Fidélis T, Cardoso AS, Riazi F, Miranda AC, Abrantes J, Teles F, Roebeling PC (2021) Policy narratives of circular economy in the EU—assessing the embeddedness of water and land in national action plans. J Clean Prod 288:125685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125685
European Commission (2022) EU policy framework on biobased, biodegradable and compostable plastics, https://environment.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2022-12/COM_2022_682_1_EN_ACT_part1_v4.pdf
Regional Cooperation Council (2020) Sofia Declaration on the Green Agenda for the Western Balkans, https://www.rcc.int/docs/546/sofia-declaration-on-the-green-agenda-for-the-western-balkans-rn
Regional Cooperation Council (2020) Action Plan for the Implementation of the Sofia Declaration on the Green Agenda for the Western Balkans 2021–2030, https://www.rcc.int/docs/596/action-plan-for-the-implementation-of-the-sofia-declaration-on-the-green-agenda-for-the-western-balkans-2021-2030
Stojanović Ž (2022) Agriculture in Serbia. In: Manić E, Nikitović V, Djurović P (eds) The Geography of Serbia. World Regional Geography Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74701-5_15
Republic of Serbia, Ministry of Mining and Energy (2016) Energy sector development strategy of the Republic of Serbia for the period by 2025 with projections by 2023, https://meemp-serbia.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Legislative-Energy-Sector-Development-Strategy-of-the-Republic-of-Serbia-for-the-period-by-2025-with-projections-by-2030.pdf
UNDP Serbia (2021) The Roadmap for Circular Economy in Serbia, https://www.undp.org/serbia/publications/roadmap-circular-economy-serbia
Pavlović M, Vulić M, Pavlović A (2020) Circular economy in Republic of Serbia and Region. In: Ghosh S (ed) Circular economy: global perspective. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1052-6_18
UNECE project (2021–2024) 1st National Policy Dialogue on the Circular Economy in the Agri-Food Sector, https://unece.org/trade/CicularEconomy/UNDAProject
Predojević-Despić JR (2021) The population change in Serbia in the post-Yugoslav period (1991–2017): significant demographic aspects. Sociološki pregled 53(3), 1183–1216, https://www.academia.edu/81519825/The_population_change_in_Serbia_in_the_post_Yugoslav_period_1991_2017_Significant_demographic_aspects?f_ri=64336
European Commission, Joint Research Center, Ispra, Italy (2008) Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators—Methodology and User Guide, https://www.oecd.org/sdd/42495745.pdf
World Bank, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.AGR.TOTL.ZS?locations=RS, Accessed 28 July 2023.