Supervision of Psychosocial Skills in Genetic Counseling

American Board of Genetic Counseling. (2004). Requirements for graduate programs in genetic counseling seeking accreditation by the American Board of Genetic Counseling. Bethesda, MD: Author. Beier, E. G., & Young, D. M. (1984). The silent language of psychotherapy: Social reinforcement of unconscious processes (2nd ed.). New York: Aldine. Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (1998). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Borders, L. D., & Brown, L. L. (2005). The new handbook of counseling supervision. Mahwah, NJ: Lahaska/Lawrence Erlbaum. DiCastro, M., Frydman, M., Friedman, I., Shiri-Sverdlov, R., Papa, M. Z., Goldman, B., & Friedman, E. (2002). Genetic counseling in hereditary breast/ovarian cancer in Israel: Psychosocial impact and retention of genetic information. Am J Med Genet, 111, 147–151. Duric, V., Butow, P., Sharpe, L., Lobb, E., Meiser, B., Barratt, A., & Tucker, K. (2003). Reducing psychological distress in a genetic counseling consultation for breast cancer. J Genet Counsel, 12, 243–264. Egan, G. (1994). The skilled helper (5th ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. Frets, P. G., Duivenvoorden, H. J., Verhage, F., & Niermeijer, M. F. (1992). The genetics of hand malformations. Birth Defects: Original Article Series, 28(1), 21–28. Kagan (Klein), H., & Kagan, N. I. (1997). Interpersonal process recall: Influencing human interaction. In C. E. Watkins, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 296–309). New York: Wiley. Kagan, N. (1975). Interpersonal process recall: A method of influencing human interaction. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University. Kagan, N. (1980). Influencing human interaction—Eighteen years with IPR. In A. K. Hess (Ed.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research and practice (pp. 262–283). New York: Wiley. Leonard, C., Chase, C., & Childs, B. (1972). Genetic counseling: A consumer's view. N Engl J Med, 287, 433–439. Liddle, B. J. (1986). Resistance in supervision: A response to perceived threat. Couns Educ Superv, 26, 117–127. Loganbill, C., Hardy, E., & Delworth, U. (1982). Supervision: A conceptual model. Counsel Psychol, 10(1), 3–42. Masters, M. A. (1992). The use of positive reframing in the context of supervision. J Couns Dev, 70, 387–390. McCarthy, P., & LeRoy, B. S. (1998). Student supervision. In D. L. Baker, J. L. Schuette, & W. R. Uhlmann (Eds.), A guide to genetic counseling (pp. 295–319). New York: Wiley-Liss. McCarthy Veach, P., LeRoy, B. W., & Bartels, D. M. (2003). Facilitating the genetic counseling process: A practice manual. New York: Springer. McCarthy Veach, P., Truesdell, S. E., LeRoy, B. S., & Bartels, D. M. (1999). Client perceptions of the impact of genetic counseling: An exploratory study. J Genet Counsel, 8, 191–216. Pasacreta, J. V. (2003). Psychosocial issues associated with genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk: An integrative review. Cancer Investig, 21, 588–623. Stoltenberg, C. (1981). Approaching supervision from a developmental perspective: The counselor complexity model. J Counsel Psychol, 28, 59–65. White-Van Mourik, M. C. A., Connor, J. M., & Ferguson-Smith, M. A. (1992). The psychosocial sequelae of a second-trimester termination of pregnancy for fetal abnormality. Prenat Diagn, 12, 189–204. Young, J. S., & Borders, L. D. (1998). The impact of metaphor on clinical hypothesis formation and perceived supervisor characteristics. Couns Educ Superv, 37, 238–256. Young, J. S., & Borders, L. D. (1999). The intentional use of metaphor in counseling supervision. Clin Superv, 18(1), 139–149.