Sub-regionalisation of fisheries governance: the case of the Western and Central Pacific Ocean tuna fisheries
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aqorau T: Recent developments in pacific tuna fisheries: The Palau Arrangement and the Vessel Day Scheme. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 2009, 24(3):557–581. 10.1163/157180809X455647
Aranda M, Murua H, de Bruyn P: Managing fishing capacity in tuna regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs): Development and state of the art. Marine Policy 2012, 36(5):985–992. 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.01.006
Bailey M, Flores J, Pokajam S, Sumaila UR: Towards better management of Coral Triangle tuna. Ocean and Coastal Management 2012, 63: 30–42. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.03.010
Balsiger J, VanDeveer SD: Regional governance and environmental problems. The International Studies Encyclopedia 2010, 9: 6179–6200.
Balsiger J, VanDeveer SD: Navigating regional environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics 2012, 12(3):1–17. 10.1162/GLEP_e_00120
Barclay K, Cartwright I: Governance of tuna industries: the key to economic viability and sustainability in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean. Marine Policy 2007, 31(3):348–358. 10.1016/j.marpol.2006.09.007
Biermann F, Pattberg P, van Asselt H, Zelli F: The fragmentation of global governance architectures: a framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics 2009, 9(4):14–40. 10.1162/glep.2009.9.4.14
Biermann F, Abbott K, Andresen S, Bäckstrand K, Bernstein S, Betsill MM, Bulkeley H, Cashore B, Clapp J, Folke C, Gupta A, Gupta J, Haas PM, Jordan A, Kanie N, Kluvánková-Oravská T, Lebel L, Liverman D, Meadowcroft J, Mitchell RB, Newell P, Oberthür S, Olsson L, Pattberg P, Sánchez-Rodríguez R, Schroeder H, Underdal A, Vieira SC, Vogel C, Young OR, Brock A, Zondervan R: Navigating the anthropocene: improving earth system governance. Science 2012, 335(6074):1306–1307. 10.1126/science.1217255
Campbell HF: Resource rent rivalry in the western pacific tuna fishery: cooperative and non-cooperative solutions. Ocean and Shoreline Management 1989, 12(2):179–187. 10.1016/0951-8312(89)90052-0
Cash DW, Moser SC: Linking global and local scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Global Environmental Change 2000, 10(2):109–120. 10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00017-0
Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O: Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society 2006, 11(2):8.
Conca K: The rise of the region in global environmental politics. Global Environmental Politics 2012, 12(3):127–133. 10.1162/GLEP_a_00132
Cullis-Suzuki S, Pauly D: Failing the high seas: a global evaluation of regional fisheries management organizations. Marine Policy 2010, 34(5):1036–1042. 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.03.002
de Bruyn P, Murua H, Aranda M: The Precautionary approach to fisheries management: How this is taken into account by Tuna regional fisheries management organisations (RFMOs). Marine Policy 2013, 38: 397–406. 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.06.019
EU Committee on Fisheries. 2013. Recommendation on the draft Council decision on the conclusion of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community, on the one hand, and the Republic of Kiribati, on the other (13331/2012 – C7 0036/2013 – 2012/0229(NLE)). European Parliament.
Fanning L, Mahon R, McConney P, Angulo J, Burrows F, Chakalall B, Gil D, Haughton M, Heileman S, Martínez S, Ostine L, Oviedo A, Parsons S, Phillips T, Santizo Arroya C, Simmons B, Toro C: A large marine ecosystem governance framework. Marine Policy 2007, 31(4):434–443. 10.1016/j.marpol.2007.01.003
Gagern A, van den Bergh J: In Press. A critical review of fishing agreements with tropical developing countries. Marine Policy ᅟ, ᅟ: ᅟ. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.06.016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.06.016
Gilman E, Kingma E: Standard for assessing transparency in information on compliance with obligations of regional fisheries management organizations: Validation through assessment of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission. Ocean and Coastal Management 2013, 84: 31–39. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.07.006
Greenpeace Briefing to the 10th Reguar Meeting of hte WCPFC. Cairns, Australia, Greenpeace; 2013.
Gulbrandsen LH: Dynamic governance interactions: Evolutionary effects of state responses to non-state certification programs. Regulation & Governance 2013, 8(1):74–92. 10.1111/rego.12005
Hamilton A, Lewis A, Campling L: Report on the Implementation of the derogation to the standard rules of origin granted to the Pacific ACP States in the framework of the Interim Economic Partnership Agreement. European Union. FWC COM 2011 RFS 2011/266449, Brussels; 2011.
Hanich Q: Control, Cooperation and ‘Participatory Rights’ in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean Tuna Fisheries. In Navigating Pacific Fisheries: Legal and Policy Trends in the Implementation of International Fisheries Instruments in the Western and Central Pacific Region. Edited by: Hanich Q, Tsamenyi M. ANCORS, Wollongong; 2009:221–249.
Hanich Q: Regional fisheries management in ocean areas surrounding Pacific Islands States. In Proceedings of the International Seminar on Islands and Oceans. Edited by: Terashima H. Ocean Policy Research Foundation, Tokyo, Japan; 2010:195–212.
Hanich Q: Distributing the bigeye conservation burden in the western and central pacific fisheries. Marine Policy 2012, 36(2):327–332. 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.07.008
Hanich Q, Teo F, Tsamenyi M: A collective approach to Pacific islands fisheries management: Moving beyond regional agreements. Marine Policy 2010, 34(1):85–91. 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.04.018
Havice E: The structure of tuna access agreements in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean: Lessons for Vessel Day Scheme planning. Marine Policy 2010, 34(5):979–987. 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.02.004
Havice E: Rights-based management in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean tuna fishery: Economic and environmental change under the Vessel Day Scheme. Marine Policy 2013, 42: 259–267. 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.03.003
Havice E, Reed K: Fishing for Development? Tuna Resource Access and Industrial Change in Papua New Guinea. Journal of Agrarian Change 2012, 12(2–3):413–435. 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00351.x
Hegland T, Ounanian K, Raakjaer J: Why and how to regionalise the Common Fisheries Policy. Maritime Studies 2012, 11(1):7. 10.1186/2212-9790-11-7
Langley A, Wright A, Hurry G, Hampton J, Aqorua T, Rodwell L: Slow steps towards management of the world’s largest tuna fishery. Marine Policy 2009, 33(2):271–279. 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.07.009
Lebel L, Garden P, Imamura M: The politics of scale, position, and place in the governance of water resources in the Mekong region. Ecology and Society 2005, 10(2):18.
Meadowcroft J: Politics and scale: some implications for environmental governance. Landscape and Urban Planning 2002, 61(2):169–179. 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00111-1
Morgan JR: Marine regions: Myth or reality. Marine Policy 1989, 12: 1–21.
Nauru Agreement Concerning Cooperation in the Management of Fisheries of Common Interest, Parties to the Nauru Agreement. 1982.
Oberthür S, Stokke OS: Managing institutional complexity: regime interplay and global environmental change. MIT Press, Michigan; 2011.
Paasi A: Place and region: looking through the prism of scale. Progress in Human Geography 2004, 28(4):536–546. 10.1191/0309132504ph502pr
Palau Arrangement for the Management Of The Western Pacific Fishery as Amended, 1992 (Amended 11th September 2010). 1992.
Parris H: Is the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission meeting its conservation and management objectives? Ocean and Coastal Management 2010, 53(1):10–26. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2009.10.002
Parris H: Tuna dreams and tuna realities: Defining the term “maximising economic returns from the tuna fisheries” in six Pacific Island states. Marine Policy 2010, 34(1):105–113. 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.04.022
Parris H, Grafton RQ: Can tuna promote sustainable development in the pacific? The Journal of Environment & Development 2006, 15(3):269–296. 10.1177/1070496506289364
Additional Closures by the PNA - Republic of the Marshall Islands on Behalf of the Parties to the Nauru Agreement. Federated States of Micronesia, WCPFC, Pohnpei; 2010.
PNA Presents to Industry at InfoFish Bangkok. 2014.
Raakjaer J, Hegland T: Introduction: regionalising the Common Fisheries Policy. Maritime Studies 2012, 11(1):5. 10.1186/2212-9790-11-5
Ride A: Unfinished business remains as WCPFC ends. Forum Fisheries Agency, Honiara; 2010.
Shanks S: Introducing a transferable fishing day management regime for Pacific Island countries. Marine Policy 2010, 34(5):988–994. 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.02.005
Review of the Implementation and Effectiveness of CMM 2008–01. Republic of Korea, Busan; 2012.
Swyngedouw E: “Scaled geographies: Nature, place, and the politics of scale”. Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society, and method. In Scale and geographic inquiry: Scale and geographic inquiry: Nature, society, and method. Edited by: McMaster R, Sheppard E. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford; 2004:129–153. 10.1002/9780470999141.ch7
Symes D: Regionalisation of Fisheries Governance: An Empty Vessel or a Cornucopia of Opportunity. In Participation in Fisheries Governance. Edited by: Gray T. Springer, Netherlands; 2005:85–102. 10.1007/1-4020-3778-3_5
Symes D: Regionalising the Common Fisheries Policy: context, content and controversy. Maritime Studies 2012, 11(1):6. 10.1186/2212-9790-11-6
Tsamenyi M: The institutional framework for regional cooperation in ocean and coastal management in the South Pacific. Ocean and Coastal Management 1999, 42(6–7):465–481. 10.1016/S0964-5691(99)00033-2
Tutangata T, Power M: The regional scale of ocean governance regional cooperation in the Pacific Islands. Ocean and Coastal Management 2002, 45(11–12):873–884. 10.1016/S0964-5691(02)00111-4
Valencia MJ: The South China Sea Prospects for marine regionalism. Marine Policy 1978, 2(2):87–104. 10.1016/0308-597X(78)90002-7
Vallega A: Ocean governance in post-modern society—a geographical perspective. Marine Policy 2001, 25(6):399–414. 10.1016/S0308-597X(01)00024-0
Van Leeuwen J, Kern K: The External Dimension of European Union Marine Governance: Institutional Interplay between the EU and the International Maritime Organization. Global Environmental Politics 2013, 13(1):69–87. 10.1162/GLEP_a_00154
Convention on the conservation and management of highly migratory fish stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean. WCPFC, Pohnpei; 2000.
Conservation and management measure for Bigeye and Yellowfin Tuna in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean. 2008.
Commission for the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean. Scientific Committee Report. W. S. Committee. WCPFC, Kolonia, Pohnpei; 2012.
Conservation and management measure for Bigeye, Yellowfin and Skipjack tuna in the Western and Central Pacific ocean, Commission 9th Regular Session Manila, Philippines, 2–6 December 2012. 2012.
Recommendations from the Review of the WCPFC, WCPFC-SC8–2012/GN-WP-08. 2012c.
Wilson JA: Matching social and ecological systems in complex ocean fisheries. Ecology and Society 2006, 11(9):9. [online] URL:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art9/ [online] URL:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art9/
Wright A, Stacey N, Holland P: The cooperative framework for ocean and coastal management in the Pacific Islands: Effectiveness, constraints and future direction. Ocean and Coastal Management 2006, 49(9–10):739–763. 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2006.06.013
Young O: Vertical interplay among scale-dependent environmental and resource regimes. Ecology and Society 2006, 11(1):ᅟ. [online] URL:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art27/ [online] URL:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art27/