Studying cyborgs: re-examining internet studies as human subjects research

Allen, G.N., Ball, N.L. and Smith, J.H. (2011). Information Systems Research Behaviors: What are the normative standards? MIS Quarterly 35 (3): 533–551. Allen, G.N., Burk, D.L. and Davis, G.B. (2006). Academic Data Collection in Electronic Environments: Defining acceptable use of internet resources, MIS Quarterly 30 (3): 599–610. AoIR (2002). Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR working committee, Association of Internet Researchers [WWW document], http://www.drury.edu/ess/aoir/ethics.html (accessed 23 October 2012). Bakardjieva, M. and Feenberg, A. (2000). Involving the Virtual Subject, Ethics and Information Technology 2 (4): 233–240. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning, Durham & London: Duke University Press. Bassett, E.H. and O’Riordan, K. (2002). Ethics of Internet Research: Contesting the human subjects research model, Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3): 233–247. Binford, L.R. (1962). Achhaeology as Anthropology, American Antiquity 28 (2): 217–225. Borer, M.I. (2002). The Cyborgian Self: Toward a critical social theory of cyberspace, Reconstruction: Studies in Contemporary Culture 2 (3). boyd, d. (2006). Identity Production in a Networked Culture: Why youth heart Myspacec, in D. Buckingham (ed.) MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Learning – Youth, Identity and Digital Media, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 119–142. Bruckman, A. (2002). Studying the Amateur Artist: A perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the internet, Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3): 217–231. Capurro, R. and Pingel, C. (2002). Ethical Issues of Online Communication Research, Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3): 189–194. Cassells, E.S. (1997). The Archaeology of Colorado, 2nd edn, Boulder, CO: Johnson Books. Chen, S.-L.S., Hall, G.J. and John, M.D. (Eds.) (2004). Research Paparazzi in Cyberspace: The voices of the researched, in Online Social Research: Methods, Issues & Ethics, New York, NY: Peter Lang, pp. 223–238. Clegg Smith, K.M. (2004). ‘Electronic Eavesdropping’: The ethical issues involved in conducting a virtual ethnography, in M.D. Johns, S.-L.S. Chen and G.J. Hall (eds.) Online Social Research: Methods, Issues & Ethics, New York: Peter Lang, pp. 223–238. Dibbell, J. (1993). A Rape in Cyberspace, in The Village Voice, New York, pp. 36–42. Elgesem, D. (2002). What is special about the ethical issues in online research? Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3): 195–203. Ess, C. (2002). Introduction, Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3): 177–188. Frankel, M.S. and Siang, S. (1999). Ethical and Legal Aspects of Human Subjects Research on the Internet, Washington DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Garfinkel, H. (1966). Studies in Ethnomethodology, New York: Polity Press. Grimes, J.M., Fleischmann, K.R. and Jaeger, P.T. (2010). Research Ethics and Virtual Worlds, in C. Wankel and S. Malleck (eds.) Emerging Ethical Issues of Life in Virtual Worlds, Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, p. 73. Hardey, M. (2002). Life Beyond the Screen: Embodiment and identity through the internet, The Sociological Review 50 (4): 570–585. Herring, S.C. (1996). Linguistic and Critical Analysis of Computer-Mediated Communication: Some ethical and scholarly considerations, The Information Society 12 (2): 153–168. Herring, S.C., Scheidt, L.A., Bonus, S. and Wright, E. (2004). Bridging the Gap: A genre analysis of weblogs, in Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii: IEEE. Holehouse, M. and Millward, D. (2011). How technology fuelled Britains first 21st century riot, Telegraph, August 8. [WWW document], http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/8687432/How-technology-fuelled-Britains-first-21st-century-riot.html. Hudson, J.M. and Bruckman, A. (2004). ‘Go Away’ Participant Observations to Being Studied and the Ethics of Chatroom Research, The Information Society 20: 127–139. Introna, L.D. (2007). Towards a Post-Human Intra-Actional Account of Socio-Technical Agency (and Morality), in Moral Agency and Technical Artefacts, Hague, Netherlands: NIAS. Introna, L.D. and Hayes, N. (2011). On Sociomaterial Imbrications: What plagiarism detection systems reveal and why it matters, Information & Organization 21 (3): 107–122. Isaacson, W. (2007). Einstein: His Life and Universe, New York: Simon & Schuster. Jensen Schau, H. and Gilly, M.C. (2003). Are We What We Post? Self-presentation in personal Web space, Journal of Consumer Research 30 (3): 385–404. Kane, G.C., Majchrzak, A., Johnson, J. and Chenisern, L. (2009). A Longitudinal Model of Perspective Making and Perspective Taking within Fluid Online Collectives, in International Cancer Imaging Society, Phoenix, AZ: AIS. Kendall, L. (2004). Participants and Observers in Online Ethnography: Five stories about identity, in M.D. Johns, S.-L.S. Chen and G.J. Hall (Eds.) Online Social Research: Methods, issues & ethics, New York: Peter Lang, pp. 125–140. King, S.A. (1996). Researching Internet Communities: Proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of results, The Information Society 12 (2): 119–129. Kyburg, H.E. (1968). Philosophy of Science: A Formal Approach, New York: The Macmillan Company. LeBesco, K. (2004). Managing Visibility, Intimacy, and Focus in Online Critical Ethnography, in M.D. Johns, S.-L.S. Chen and G.J. Hall (eds.) Online Social Research: Methods, Issues and Ethics, New York: Peter Lang, pp. 47–62. London, A.J., Kimmelman, J. and Carlisle, B. (2012). Rethinking Research Ethics: The case of postmarketing trials, Science 336 (6081): 544–545. Madge, C. and O’Connor, H. (2005). Mothers in the Making? Exploring liminality in cyber/space, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30 (1): 83–97. McCreary, L. (2008). What Was Privacy? Harvard Business Review 86 (10): 123–131. McCullagh, K. (2008). Blogging: Self-presentation and privacy, Information & Communication Technology Law 17 (1): 3–23. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, New York: McGraw Hill. Nyberg, D. (2009). Computers, Customer Service Operatives and Cyborgs: Intra-actions in call centres, Organization Studies 30 (11): 1181–1199. Orlikowski, W.J. (2000). Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations, Organization Science 11 (4): 404–428. Palen, L. and Dourish, P. (2003). Unpacking ‘Privacy’ for a Networked World, in CHI, Fort Lauderdale, FL: ACM. Parry, M. (2011). Harvard Researchers Accused of Breaching Students’ Privacy: Social-network project shows promise and peril of doing social science online, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 10 July. Reid, E. (1996). Informed Consent in the Study of on-Line Communities: A reflection on the effects of computer-mediated social research, The Information Society 12 (2): 169–174. Scharf, B. (1999). Beyond Netiquette: The ethics of doing naturalistic discourse research on the internet, in S. Jones (ed.) Doing Internet Research, London: Sage, pp. 243–256. Schrag, Z.M. (2011). How Should Human Subjects Regulation Change? [WWW document] www.institutionalreviewblog.com (accessed November 2011). Schrödinger, E. (1935). The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics: A Translation of Schrodinger's ‘Cat Paradox Paper’ Translated by John D. Trimmer, Originally Published in Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 1980, 124(5), 323–338. Schrum, L. (1995). Framing the Debate: Ethical research in the information age, Qualitative Inquiry 1 (3): 311–326. Simpson, B. (2005). Identity Manipulation in Cyberspace as a Leisure Option: Play and the Exploration of Self, Information & Communication Technology Law 14 (2): 115–131. Slater, D. (2002). Social Relationships and Identity Online and Offline, in L. Lievrouw and S. Livingston (Eds.) The Handbook of New Media, London: Sage, pp. 533–546. Solon, O. (2011). Why Has BlackBerry Been Blamed for the London Riots?, Wired.com Epicenter 9 August. Taylor, W. (1948). A Study of Archaeology, Memoir series of the American Anthropological Association 69 (Reprinted 1964 by Southern Illinois University Press). Thomas, J. (1996). Introduction: A debate about the ethics of fair practices for collecting social science data in cyberspace, The Information Society 12 (2): 107–118. Thomas, J. (2004). Re-Examining the Ethics of Internet Research: Facing the challenge of overzealous oversight, in M.D. Johns, S.-L.S. Chen and G.J. Hall (eds.) Online Social Research: Methods, Issues & Ethics, New York: Peter Lang, pp. 187–201. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the Screen: Identity in the Life of the Internet, New York: Simon & Shuster. Vaast, E. (2007). The Presentation of Self in a Virtual but Work-Related Environment: From protagonists to fools, in K. Crwoston, S. Sieber and E. Wynn (Eds.) Virtuality and Virtualization, Boston, MA: Springer, pp. 183–199. Van Doorn, N. (2011). Digital Spaces, Material Traces: How matter comes to matter in online performances of gender, sexuality and embodiment, Media, Culture & Society 33 (4): 531–547. Walther, J.B. (2002). Research Ethics in Internet-Enabled Research: Human subjects issues and methodological myopia, Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3): 205–216. Waskul, D. and Douglass, M. (1996). Considering the Electronic Participant: Some polemical observations on the ethics of on-line research, The Information Society 12 (2): 129–139. Webb, E.J., Campbell, D.T., Schwartz, R.D. and Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences, Chicago: Rand McNally. White, M. (2002a). Regulating Research: The problem of theorizing community on LambdaMOO, Ethics and Information Technology 5 (1): 55–70. White, M. (2002b). Representations or People? Ethics and Information Technology 4 (3): 249–266. Whitley, E.A. (1997). In Cyberspace All They See Is Your Words: A review of the relationship between body, behavior and identity drawn from the sociology of knowledge, Information Technology & People 10 (2): 147–163. Zimmer, M. (2010). ‘But the Data Is Already Public’: On the ethics of research on Facebook, Ethics and Information Technology 12 (4): 313–325.